Skip to main content
Log in

Electronic Workflow for Imaging in Clinical Research

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the transition from paper to electronic workflow, the University of Colorado Health System’s implementation of a new electronic health record system (EHR) forced all clinical groups to reevaluate their practices including the infrastructure surrounding clinical trials. Radiological imaging is an important piece of many clinical trials and requires a high level of consistency and standardization. With EHR implementation, paper orders were manually transcribed into the EHR, digitizing an inefficient work flow. A team of schedulers, radiologists, technologists, research personnel, and EHR analysts worked together to optimize the EHR to accommodate the needs of research imaging protocols. The transition to electronic workflow posed several problems: (1) there needed to be effective communication throughout the imaging process from scheduling to radiologist interpretation. (2) The exam ordering process needed to be automated to allow scheduling of specific research studies on specific equipment. (3) The billing process needed to be controlled to accommodate radiologists already supported by grants. (4) There needed to be functionality allowing exams to finalize automatically skipping the PACS and interpretation process. (5) There needed to be a way to alert radiologists that a specialized research interpretation was needed on a given exam. These issues were resolved through the optimization of the “visit type,” allowing a high-level control of an exam at the time of scheduling. Additionally, we added columns and fields to work queues displaying grant identification numbers. The build solutions we implemented reduced the mistakes made and increased imaging quality and compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erickson BJ, Pan T, Marcus DS: Whitepapers on imaging infrastructure for research. Part 1: general workflow considerations. J Digit Imaging 25:449–453, 2012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Erickson BJ, Pan T, Marcus DS: Imaging infrastructure for research. Part 2: data management practices. J Digit Imaging 25:566–569, 2012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erickson BJ, Pan T, Marcus DS: Whitepapers on imaging infrastructure for research part three: security and privacy. J Digit Imaging 25:692–702, 2012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sachs PB, Gassert G, Cain M, Rubinstein D, Davey M, Decoteau D: Imaging study protocol selection in the electronic medical record. J Am Coll Radiol 10(3):221–223, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter B. Sachs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedges, R.A., Goodman, D. & Sachs, P.B. Electronic Workflow for Imaging in Clinical Research. J Digit Imaging 27, 457–462 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9684-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9684-1

Keywords

Navigation