Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prostate Tissue Texture Feature Extraction for Suspicious Regions Identification on TRUS Images

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, two different approaches are proposed for region of interest (ROI) segmentation using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images. The two methods aim to extract informative features that are able to characterize suspicious regions in the TRUS images. Both proposed methods are based on multi-resolution analysis that is characterized by its high localization in both the frequency and the spatial domains. Being highly localized in both domains, the proposed methods are expected to accurately identify the suspicious ROIs. On one hand, the first method depends on a Gabor filter that captures the high frequency changes in the image regions. On the other hand, the second method depends on classifying the wavelet coefficients of the image. It is shown in this paper that both methods reveal details in the ROIs which correlate with their pathological representations. It was found that there is a good match between the regions identified using the two methods, a result that supports the ability of each of the proposed methods to mimic the radiologist’s decision in identifying suspicious regions. Studying two ROI segmentation methods is important since the only available dataset is the radiologist’s suspicious regions, and there is a need to support the results obtained by either one of the proposed methods. This work is mainly a preliminary proof of concept study that will ultimately be expanded to a larger scale study whose aim will be introducing an assisting tool to help the radiologist identify the suspicious regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig 5
Fig 6
Fig 7
Fig 8
Fig 9
Fig 10
Fig 11
Fig 12
Fig 13
Fig 14
Fig 15
Fig 16
Fig 17
Fig 18
Fig 19
Fig 20
Fig 21
Fig 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2002. Toronto, Canada, 2002

  2. Mohamed SS, Salama MMA, Kamel M, El-Sadaany EF, Rizkalla K, Chin J: Prostate cancer multi-feature analysis using TRUS images. Phys Med Biol 50(15):N175–N185, 2005 (7 August)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohamed SS, Salama MMA: Computer-aided diagnosis for prostate cancer using support vector machine. Publication: Proc SPIE 5744:899–907, Medical Imaging 2005: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display

  4. Bovik AC, Clark M, Geisler WS: Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(1):55–73, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt Jr, EM, Boone JM: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, Penn: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2002, pp. 469–553

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital Image Processing, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002 ch. 7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scheipers U, Ermert H, Sommerfeld H-J, Garcia-Schurmann M, Senge T, Philippou S: Ultrasounic multifeature tissue characterization for prostate diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol 29(8):1137–1149, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galloway Jr, RL, Cleary KR, EdsLaine A, Fan J: Texture classification by wavelet packet signatures. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(11):1186–1191, 1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiu B, Freeman GH, Salama MMA, Fenster A: Prostate segmentation algorithm using dyadic wavelet transform and discrete dynamic contour. Phys Med Biol 49(21):4943–4960, 2004 (7 November)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgiou G, Cohen FS: Is early detection of liver and breast cancers from ultrasound scans possible? Pattern Recogn Lett 24:729–739, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen D-R, Chang R-F, Kuo W-J, Chen M-C, Huang Y-L: Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Bio 28(10):1301–1310, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee W-L, Chen Y-C, Hsieh K-S: Ultrasonic liver tissues classification by fractal feature vector based on M-band wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(3):382–393, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daubechies I: Orthonormal basis for compactly supported wavelets. Commun Pure Appl Math XLI:909–996, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gleason DF: Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:125–128, 1966

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.S. Mohamed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohamed, S., Li, J., Salama, M. et al. Prostate Tissue Texture Feature Extraction for Suspicious Regions Identification on TRUS Images. J Digit Imaging 22, 503–518 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9124-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9124-1

Key words

Navigation