Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of PACS on Dictation Turnaround Time and Productivity

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This study was conducted to measure the impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity. The radiology information system (RIS) database was interrogated to calculate the time interval between image production and dictation for every exam performed during three 90-day periods (the 3 months preceding PACS implementation, the 3 months immediately following PACS deployment, and a 3-month period 1 year after PACS implementation). Data were obtained for three exam types: chest radiographs, abdominal CT, and spine MRI. The mean dictation turnaround times obtained during the different pre- and post-PACS periods were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Productivity was also determined for each period and for each exam type, and was expressed as the number of studies interpreted per full-time equivalent (FTE) radiologist. In the immediate post-PACS period, dictation turnaround time decreased 20% (p < 0.001) for radiography, but increased 13% (ns) for CT and 28% (p < 0.001) for MRI. One year after PACS was implemented, dictation turnaround time decreased 45% (p < 0.001) for radiography and 36% (p < 0.001) for MRI. For CT, 1 year post-PACS, turnaround times returned to pre-PACS levels. Productivity in the immediate post-PACS period increased 3% and 38% for radiography and CT, respectively, whereas a 6% decrease was observed for MRI. One year after implementation, productivity increased 27%, 98%, and 19% in radiography, CT, and MRI, respectively. PACS benefits, namely, shortened dictation turnaround time and increased productivity, are evident 1 year after PACS implementation. In the immediate post-PACS period, results vary with the different imaging modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BI Reiner EL Siegel C Flagle FJ Hooper RE Cox M Scanlon (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services Radiology 215 163–167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hslWrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10751482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. BI Reiner EL Seigel (2002) ArticleTitleTechnologists' productivity when using PACS: Comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography Am J Roentgenol 179 IssueID1 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  3. BI Reiner EL Siegel FJ Hooper D Glasser (1998) ArticleTitleEffects of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists Radiology 207 481–485 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jvVemuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9577498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A Mehta K Dreyer G Boland M Frank (2000) ArticleTitleDo picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times? J Digit Imaging 13 IssueID2 Suppl 1 105–107 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvotVOitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10847375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. RO Redfern et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe effect of PACS on the time required for technologists to produce radiographic images in the emergency department radiology suite J Digit Imaging 15 IssueID3 153–160 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-002-0024-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7isVWjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12415466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D Sack (2001) ArticleTitleIncreased productivity of a digital imaging system: One hospital's experience Radiol Manage 23 IssueID6 14–18 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FmsFyjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11793559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. BI Reiner EL Siegel JA Carrino (2002) ArticleTitleWorkflow optimization: current trends and future directions J Digit Imaging 15 IssueID3 141–152 Occurrence Handle12481228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. PA Andriole et al. (2002) ArticleTitleWorkflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment J Digit Imaging 15 IssueIDSuppl 1 124–126 Occurrence Handle12105711

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. L Lepanto (2003) ArticleTitleImpact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time J Digit Imaging 16 IssueID3 306–309 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-003-1730-3 Occurrence Handle14669067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. BI Reiner EL Siegel FJ Hooper S Pomerantz A Dahlke D Rallis (2001) ArticleTitleRadiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: A comparison of PACS with conventional film Am J Roentgenol 176 861–864 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hslaiug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DR Gale ME Gale RK Schwartz VV Muse RE Walker (2000) ArticleTitleAn automated PACS workstation interface: A timesaving enhancement Am J Roentgenol 174 33–36 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fpt1Sgsg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. AA Twair et al. (2000) ArticleTitleSignificant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete PACS J Digit Imaging 13 IssueID4 175–177 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzgtl2lsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11110256 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF03168392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. EP Tamm B Raval OC West S Dinwiddie R Holmes (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluating the impact of workstation usage on radiology report times in the initial 6 months following installation J Digit Imaging 12 152–154 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ntlOnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10342197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Lepanto M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lepanto, L., Paré, G., Aubry, D. et al. Impact of PACS on Dictation Turnaround Time and Productivity. J Digit Imaging 19, 92–97 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-005-9245-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-005-9245-8

Key Words

Navigation