Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiplexed Wavelet Transform Technique for Detection of Microcalcification in Digitized Mammograms

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wavelet transform (WT) is a potential tool for the detection of microcalcifications, an early sign of breast cancer. This article describes the implementation and evaluates the performance of two novel WT-based schemes for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Employing a one-dimensional WT technique that utilizes the pseudo-periodicity property of image sequences, the proposed algorithms achieve high detection efficiency and low processing memory requirements. The detection is achieved from the parent–child relationship between the zero-crossings [Marr-Hildreth (M-H) detector] /local extrema (Canny detector) of the WT coefficients at different levels of decomposition. The detected pixels are weighted before the inverse transform is computed, and they are segmented by simple global gray level thresholding. Both detectors produce 95% detection sensitivity, even though there are more false positives for the M-H detector. The M-H detector preserves the shape information and provides better detection sensitivity for mammograms containing widely distributed calcifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DB Kopans (1989) Breast Imaging, J. B. Lippincott Company Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. RG Lester (1984) ArticleTitleThe contribution of radiology to the diagnosis, management, and cure of breast cancer Radiology 151 158

    Google Scholar 

  3. RA Smith (1993) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of breast cancer categorical course in physics, Technical Aspects Breast Imaging Radiol Soc North Am . 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  4. HP Chan K Doi CJ Vyborny et al. (1990) ArticleTitleImprovement in radiologist’s detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer aided diagnosis Invest Radiol 25 1102–1110 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2sjmvVQ%3D Occurrence Handle2079409

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. BC Lo HP Chan JS Lin et al. (1995) ArticleTitleArtificial convolution neural network for medical image pattern recognitions Neural Netw 8 1201–1214 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0893-6080(95)00061-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N Karssemeijer (1991) ArticleTitleA stochastic method for automated detection of microcalcification in digital mammograms Information Prooess Digit Imaging 76 227–238

    Google Scholar 

  7. TN Wiesel (1982) ArticleTitlePost natal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment Nature 229 IssueID5883 583–591 Occurrence Handle10.1038/299583a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W Qian W Chian LP Clarke et al. (1993) Tree structured non-linear filter and wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation in mammography RS Acharya DB Goldgof (Eds) : Biomedical Image Processing and Biomedical Visualization SPIE Proc 509–520

    Google Scholar 

  9. RN Strickland HI Hann (1996) ArticleTitleWavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15 218–228 Occurrence Handle18215904 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FmtlOntQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y Yoshida K Doi RM Nishikawa et al. (1994) ArticleTitleAutomated detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet processing techniques Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE 2167 868–886

    Google Scholar 

  11. G Evangelista (1994) ArticleTitleComb and multiplexed wavelet transforms and their applications to signal processing IEEE Trans. Signal Process 42 292–303 Occurrence Handle10.1109/78.275603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. RC Gonzales P Wintz (1987) Digital Image Processing Addison-Wesley Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y Shirai (1985) Three Dimensional Computer Vision Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kiran KP, Sukhendu D, and Yegnanarayana B: One dimensional processing for edge detection using Hilbert transform. In Proceedings of the Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing (ICVGIP 2000), 25–31, 2000

  15. Mallat S, Zhong S: Characterization of Signals from Multiscale Edges. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14:710–732, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  16. D Marr (1982) Vision W.H. Freeman San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  17. J Canny (1986) ArticleTitleA computational approach to edge detection IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-8 679–698 Occurrence Handle10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MG Mini VP Devassia T Thomas (2003) ArticleTitleDetection of microcalcification in digitized mammograms using wavelet transform local extrema J Digit Imaging 16 IssueIDSuppl. 1 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  19. JM Shapiro (1993) ArticleTitleEmbedded image coding using zero trees of wavelet coefficients IEEE Trans. Signal Process 41 3445–3462 Occurrence Handle10.1109/78.258085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J Suckling et al. (1994) ArticleTitleThe Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series 1069 375–378

    Google Scholar 

  21. N Ibrahim H Fujita T Haray et al. (1997) ArticleTitleAutomated detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: CAD system application to MIAS database Phys Med Biol 42 2577–2589 Occurrence Handle10.1088/0031-9155/42/12/021 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FpsFOmsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9434310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilarrasa A, Gimenez V, Manrique D, et al.: A new algorithm for computerized detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Computer-Aided Radiology and Surgery, CARS’98:224–229, 1998

  23. Melloul M, Joskowicz L: Segmentation of microcalcification in x-ray mammograms using entropy thresholding. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Radiology and Surgery, CARS, 2002

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tessamma Thomas Ph.D.

Additional information

Permission has been granted by the Departmental Research Committee, Department of Electronics, Cochin University of Science and Technology, for pursuing research in the field of automated detection of microcalcification in digitized mammograms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mini, M., Devassia, V. & Thomas, T. Multiplexed Wavelet Transform Technique for Detection of Microcalcification in Digitized Mammograms. J Digit Imaging 17, 285–291 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-004-1020-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-004-1020-8

Keywords

Navigation