Skip to main content
Log in

Review of Technology: Planning for the Development of Telesonography

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teleradiology allows contemporaneous interpretation of imaging exams performed at some distance from the interpreting radiologist. The transmitted images are usually static. However, there is benefit to real-time review of full-motion ultrasound (US) exams as they are performed. Telesonography is transmission of full-motion sonographic data to a remote site. We hypothesize that US exams, read after having been compressed utilizing Motion Picture Experts Group version 4 (MPEG-4) compression scheme, transmitted over the Internet as streaming multimedia, decompressed, and displayed, are equivalent in diagnostic accuracy to reading the examinations locally. MPEG-4 uses variable compression on each image frame to achieve a constant output bit rate. With less compression, the bit rate rises, and the only way the encoder can contain bit rate within the set bandwidth is by lowering frame rate or reducing image quality. We review the relevant technologies and industry standard components that will enable low-cost telesonography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JB Landwehr SuffixJr IE Zador HM Wolfe et al. (1997) ArticleTitleTelemedicine and fetal ultrasonography: assessment of technical performance and clinical feasibility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 846–848 Occurrence Handle9369831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. CR Macedonia (1998) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional ultrasonographic telepresence. J Telemed Telecare 4 224–230 Occurrence Handle10.1258/1357633981932280 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvjsV2rtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10505359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O Ratib Y Ligier D Brandon et al. (2000) ArticleTitleUpdate on digital image management and PACS. Abdom Imaging 25 333–340 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002610000011 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fjs1CrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10926185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. SC Hwang MH Lee (2000) ArticleTitleA WEB-based telePACS using an asymmetric satellite system. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 4 212–215 Occurrence Handle10.1109/4233.870031 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvns1Smuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11026591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. FK Mathiesen (2001) ArticleTitleWEB technology—the future of teleradiology? Comput Meth Programs Biomed 66 87–90 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00140-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3pslaqsw%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.algotec.com/products/medisurf.htm

  7. Y Kinosada A Takada M Hosoba (2001) ArticleTitleReal-time radiology—new concepts for teleradiology. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 66 47–54 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00134-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3pslartg%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria 2000. Radiology 215 Suppl: 1-1511, 2000

  9. JA Shea JA Berlin JJ Escarce et al. (1994) ArticleTitleRevised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 154 2573–2581 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archinte.154.22.2573 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2s%2FmsVU%3D Occurrence Handle7979854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. WC O’Neill (2000) ArticleTitleSonographic evaluation of renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 35 1021–1038 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgsFegtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10845813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. FC Laing DL Brown DN DiSalvo (2001) ArticleTitleGynecologic ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am 39 523–540 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvmtFKruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11506091

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. V Chan A Hanbidge S Wilson et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCase for active physician involvement in US practice. Radiology 199 555–560 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB3c3otVU%3D Occurrence Handle8668811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DV Beard BM Hemminger B Keefe et al. (1993) ArticleTitleReal-time radiologist review of remote ultrasound using low-cost video and voice. Invest Radiol 28 732–734 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA1cfhtFU%3D Occurrence Handle8376006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J Falconer W Giles H Villanueva (1997) ArticleTitleRealtime ultrasound diagnosis over a wide-area network (WAN) using off-the-shelf components. J Telemed Telecare 3 IssueID(Suppl 1 28–30 Occurrence Handle10.1258/1357633971930265 Occurrence Handle9218374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AJ Duerinckx A Hayrapetian M Melany et al. (1997) ArticleTitleReal-time sonographic video transfer using asynchronous transfer mode technology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 1353–1355 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2srmslc%3D Occurrence Handle9129443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. AS Tanenbaum (1996) Computer Networks. EditionNumber3 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ 67–72

    Google Scholar 

  17. SL Fritz (1999) DICOM standardization. EL Siegel RM Kolodner (Eds) Filmless Radiology. Springer New York 311–321

    Google Scholar 

  18. H Oosterwijk (2000) DICOM Basics. O’Tech Inc. Crossroads, TX

    Google Scholar 

  19. M Chanbari (2000) Video coding. Short Run Press Ltd Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  20. GK Wallace (1991) ArticleTitleThe JPEG still picture compression standard. Commun ACM 34 30–44 Occurrence Handle10.1145/103085.103089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MPEG-1 (Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to 1.5 Mbit/s) ISO/IEC 1117-1122, video, November 1991

  22. BG Haskel A Puri AN Netravali (1997) Digital video: an introduction to MPEG-2 Chapman and Hall New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. R Koener F Perera L Chiariglione (1997) ArticleTitleMPEG-4: context and objectives. Image Commun J 9 4

    Google Scholar 

  24. WH Pennebaker JL Mitchell (1993) JPEG: still image compression standard. Van Nostrand Reinhold New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inside Windows Media. Que, Microsoft Corporation, 1999, www.quecorp.com

  26. GA DeAngelis BJ Dempsey S Berr et al. (1997) ArticleTitleDiagnostic efficacy of compressed digitized real-time sonography of uterine fibroids. Acad Radiol 4 83–89 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3MvntV0%3D Occurrence Handle9061079

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. GA DeAngelis BJ Dempsey S Berr et al. (1995) ArticleTitleDigitized real-time ultrasound: signal compression experiment. Radiology 197 336

    Google Scholar 

  28. JW Sublett BJ Dempsey AC Weaver (1995) Design and implementation of a digital teleultrasound system for real-time remote diagnosis, computer-based medical systems. IEEE Computer Society Press Los Alamitos, CA 292–228

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sublett J: Design of a Teleultrasound System, Master’s thesis, University of Virginia, May 1996

  30. Bubash–Faust LB, Bassignani MJ: A Comparison between Diagnostic Quality Digitizer and Flat Bed Scanner with Transparency Adapter for the Creation of Digital Teaching Files. Society for Health Services Research in Radiology Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, October 18-20, 2001

  31. Weaver AC, Viswanathan A, Gay S, et al: Teleultasound. RSNA, December 1996

  32. Weaver AC, Dwyer SJ, Rheuban K: An exploration of streaming multimedia for pediatric cardiology. Fund for Exploration of Science and Technology, University of Virginia, March 2001

  33. JA Swets RM Pickett (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems, methods from signal detection theory. Academic Press New York 80–93

    Google Scholar 

  34. JA Hanley BJ McNeil (1982) ArticleTitleThe meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143 29–36 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2C2M7oslc%3D Occurrence Handle7063747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. JA Hanley BJ McNeil (1983) ArticleTitleA method of comparing the areas under receiving operating characteristic curves from the same cases. Radiology 148 839–843 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyB2svmtlA%3D Occurrence Handle6878708

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. SB Barnett HD Rott GR ter Haar et al. (1997) ArticleTitleThe sensitivity of biological tissue to ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 23 805–812 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00027-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2cnjvFE%3D Occurrence Handle9300983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects Committee (1988) ArticleTitleBioeffects considerations for the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 7 IssueID(9 Suppl) S1–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Bassignani M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassignani, M.J., Dwyer, S.J., Ciambotti, J.M. et al. Review of Technology: Planning for the Development of Telesonography. J Digit Imaging 17, 18–27 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-003-1721-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-003-1721-4

Keywords

Navigation