Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dexmedetomidine (12.5 μg/mL) improves tissue distribution, anesthetic action, and hemodynamic effects of lidocaine after palatal infiltration in rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (DEX) is a α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that causes vasoconstriction by acting on α2B-adrenergic receptors in peripheral blood vessels. The authors aimed to determine the influence of DEX on tissue distribution, anesthetic action, and hemodynamic effects of lidocaine in rats. The investigators injected indigo carmine-containing 14C-labeled lidocaine hydrochloride (2 %) without and with 3.1, 12.5, or 50 μg/mL DEX or 10 μg/mL epinephrine into the right palatal mucosa mesial to the maxillary first molar of specific pathogen-free male Wistar rats. Autoradiography and liquid scintillation counting were performed to evaluate 14C-labeled lidocaine concentrations in the palatal mucosa, maxillary bone, maxillary nerve, and peripheral blood. Somatosensory-evoked potentials were measured to analyze anesthetic action, and blood pressure and pulse rate were measured to compare hemodynamic effects. DEX extended the tissue distribution of lidocaine in a concentration-dependent manner. Lidocaine with 12.5 μg/mL DEX had similar blood peak arrival time and peak-to-peak amplitude as lidocaine with 10 μg/mL epinephrine, but it reduced pulse rate. The results of this study suggest that 12.5 μg/mL DEX improves tissue distribution, anesthetic action, and hemodynamic effects of lidocaine in rats. Therefore, 12.5 μg/mL DEX may be a suitable alternative to epinephrine in lidocaine formulations, especially for patients with ischemic heart disease and hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1—3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7–10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13–15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshitomi T, Kohjitani A, Maeda S, et al. Dexmedetomidine enhances the local anesthetic action of lidocaine via an α2A adrenoceptor. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz J. The distribution of 14C-labelled lidocaine injected intravenously in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1968;29:249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yasuda A, Yamashiro M, Hashimoto S, et al. Effects of adrenaline on the pharmacokinetics of 14C-lidocaine after maxillary infiltration anesthesia in rats. J Jpn Dent Soc Anesthesiol. 2011;39:1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lakhlani PP, MacMillan LB, Guo TZ, et al. Substitution of a mutant α2a-adrenergic receptor via “hit and run” gene targeting reveals the role of this subtype in sedative, analgesic, and anesthetic-sparing responses in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:9950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakaguchi Y, Takahashi S. Dexmedetomidine. Jpn J Anesthesiol. 2006;55:856 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taiji K. Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (Precedex), a new sedative in intensive care, its pharmacological characteristics and clinical study result. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2004;124:171 (in Japanese).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abe S, Takahashi S, Sumitomo M, et al. Estimation of the effects of local anesthetics by somatosensory-evoked potentials—comparison between lidocaine and bupivacaine. J Jpn Dent Soc Anesthesiol. 1991;19:509.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oda H. Anesthetic efficacy of levobupivacaine on the tooth pulp of rats Evaluation with somatosensory evoked potential following tooth pulp electrical stimulation. J Matsumoto Dent Univ Soc. 2009;35:270.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Noguchi I. Analgesic effects of soluble acetylsalicylic acid judged by the changes in somatosensory evoked potentials in rat. J Jpn Dent Soc Anesthesiol. 1985;13:427.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sasao M. Quantitative estimation of the effects of local anesthetics by analyzing somatosensory evoked potentials—infiltration anesthesia to the tooth pulp. J Jpn Dent Soc Anesthesiol. 1988;16:10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishida J, Sunada K, Yoshie M, et al. Clonidine influence on the effective period of lidocaine, heart rate, and blood pressure in spontaneous hypertension rats. J Jpn Dent Soc Anesthesiol. 1997;26:43.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takaya M, Moritake K, Konishi T, et al. Effects of pentobarbital anesthetic induction on sensory evoked potentials in the cat. No To Shinkei. 1986;38:961 (in Japanese).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozo M, Takehiko O, Masatoshi I, et al. Effects of pentobarbital on visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in adult rats. Ann Paediatr Japon. 1988;34:73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allison T, Goff WR, Abrahamian HA, et al. The effects of barbiturate anesthesia upon human somatosensory evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1963;24:68.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ali Erdogan M, Polat A, Yucel A, et al. Effects of perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with levobupivacaine in a rat sciatic nerve block. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2013;74:74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohamed AA, Mohamed Fares K, Mohamed SA. Efficacy of intrathecally administered dexmedetomidine versus dexmedetomidine with fentanyl in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. Pain Physician. 2012;15:339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The support of the research staff at both the Department of Dental Anesthesiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo and Section of Radioisotope Research, Center of Odontology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuma Akimoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akimoto, T., Hashimoto, S. & Sunada, K. Dexmedetomidine (12.5 μg/mL) improves tissue distribution, anesthetic action, and hemodynamic effects of lidocaine after palatal infiltration in rats. Odontology 104, 390–396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-015-0221-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-015-0221-6

Keywords

Navigation