Skip to main content
Log in

Bounds for how much influence an observation can have

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

That outliers or influential observations can affect the results in a regression is well-known. But it is not clear how much influence a specific observation can have on other statistics. In time series, especially in predictive situations, the effect of additional observations is of singular importance. We here examine bounds for the effect of an additional observation on the mean, variance, Mahalanobis distance, product moment correlation, and coefficients of linearity and monotonicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson AC, Riani M, Cerioli A (2004) A exploring multivariate data with the forward search. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA, Kruskal WH (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. J Am Stat Assoc 49: 732–764

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goroncy A, Rychlik T (2006) How deviant can you be? The complete solution. Math Inequalities Appl 9: 633–647

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman L (1968) A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika 33: 469–506

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman L (1977) What is not what in statistics. Statistician 26: 81–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ST, Styan GPH (1999) GPH Some comments and a bibliography on the Laguerre–Samuelson inequality with extensions and applications in statistics and matrix theory. In: Rassias TM, Srivastava HM(eds) Analytic and geometric inequalities and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 151–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Joarder AH, Laradji A (2005) Algebraic inequalities for measures of dispersion. J Prob Stat Sci 3: 317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Laguerre EN (1880) Sur une méthode pour obtenir par approximation les racines d’une éq algébrique qui a toutes ses racines réelles. Nouv Ann Math (Paris) 2e Serie 19:161–171; 193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Maronna RA, Martin RD, Yohai VJ (2006) Robust statistics: theory and methods. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AW, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Niezgoda M (2007) Laguerre–Samuelson type inequalities. Linear Algebra Appl 412: 574–581

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raveh A (1986) On measures of monotone association. Am Stat 40: 117–123

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raveh A (1989) A new version of structural persistence in prediction. J Time Ser Anal 10: 77–93

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raveh A, Schwarz G (1996) Simple diagnostic tools for investigation linear trends in time series. Commun Stat Theory Methods 25: 1505–1524

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1968) How deviant can you be?. J Am Stat Assoc 63: 1522–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WR (1935) On a criterion for the rejection of observations and the distribution of the ratio of deviation to sample standard deviation. Ann Math Stat 6: 214–219

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkler G, Puntanen G. (2005) A multivariate version of Samuelson’s inequality. Linear Algebra Appl 410: 143–149

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan X (2002) Matrix inequalities. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 1790. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingram Olkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olkin, I., Raveh, A. Bounds for how much influence an observation can have. Stat Methods Appl 18, 1–11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-008-0100-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-008-0100-1

Keywords

Navigation