Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An empirical investigation on organizational innovation and individual creativity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovation is one of the critical success factors for organizations. It is essential for business to understand the driving forces of innovation. This study investigates the impact of the following three factors on innovation: employee relationship, knowledge sharing, and IT application maturity. 167 samples of firm level data were collected to construct the measurements of innovation, intensity of employee relationship, employee diversity, quality of knowledge sharing, and IT application maturity. It is found that all of these factors have significant impacts on innovation. We further extend the investigation to individual creativity as a corresponding concept to organizational innovation. An employee social network was constructed at a size of 149 nodes. It is shown that the centrality of each employee in the social network has significant positive impact on individual creativity. With these results from investigating organizational innovation and individual creativity, this study empirically illustrates the importance of enhancing employee relationship, knowledge sharing, and IT application maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja MK, Galletta DF, Carley KM (2003) Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: an empirical study. Manage Sci 49(1):21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior 10:123–167, JAI Press, Greenwich

  • Amabile TM (1997) Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. Calif Manage Rev 40(1):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J 39:1154–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Adm Sci Q 50(3):367–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews KM, Delahaye BL (2000) Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: the psychological filter. J Manage Stud 37(6):2322–2380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bampo M (2008) The effects of the social structure of digital networks on viral marketing performance. Inf Syst Res 19(3):273–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Special theory forum the resource-based model of the firm: origins, implications, and prospects. J Manag 17(1):97–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian Y (1997) Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. Am Sociol Rev 62(3):366–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian Y, Zhang W (2001) Economic systems, social networks and occupational mobility. Social Sciences in China (2):77–90 (Chinese publication)

  • Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Campell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L (2009) The research of the firm’s interpersonal knowledge networks and interpersonal relationship networks and their associations with employee’s performance. Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Chinese publication)

  • Chen ZF, Guan JC (2009) The impacts of small worlds on innovation. Chin J Manag Sci 17(3):115–120 (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi SY, Lee H, Yoo Y (2010) The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study. MIS Q 34(4):855–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross R, Cummings JN (2004) Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge intensive work. Acad Manag J 47(6):928–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan MM, Apaydin M (2010) A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J Manage Stud 47(6):1154–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DR, Todor WD (1979) Turnover turned over: an expanded and positive perspective. Acad Manag Rev 4:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34(3):555–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhas W, Dollinger MJ (1998) A provisional comparison of factor structures using English, Japanese, and Chinese versions of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychol Rep 83:1095–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high performance knowledge sharing network: the case of Toyota. Strateg Manag J 21(3):345–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson C, Nembhard IM (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: the challenges are the benefits. J Prod Innov Manage 26(2):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford CM (1996) A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Acad Manag Rev 21(4):1112–1142

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Z, Zhou W (2010) The influence of cluster firm’s social capital on its innovation performance. J Strateg Manag 2(1):25–36 (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gera S, Gu W (2004) The effect of organizational innovation and information technology on firm performance. Int Perform Monit 9:37–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing V, Nooteboom B (2005) Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. Eur Manag Rev 2(3):179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson L (2001) Diversity, dissimilarity and creativity: does group composition or being different enhance or hinder creative performance. Academy of Management Meetings, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1992) Networks and organizations, structure, form and action. In: Nohria N, Eceles R (eds) Problem of explanation in economic sociology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp 25–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn J, Moon JY, Zhang C (2008) Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: impact of prior collaboration ties. Inf Syst Res 19(3):369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TM (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization sub-units. Adm Sci Q 44:82–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks P (1999) Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowl Process Manag 6:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra H, Andrews SP (1993) Social influence and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Adm Sci Q 38:277–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ipe M (2003) Knowledge sharing on organizations: a conceptual framework. Hum Resour Dev Rev 2(4):337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyaraj A (2007) The effect of influence tactics and contingency factors on the adoption and diffusion of IS/IT innovations in social networks. Ph.D. thesis, University of Missouri–Saint Louis, 2007, 262 p, AAT 3286504

  • Lin HF (2007) Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. Int J Manpow 2007(28):315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J (2010) Social network analysis. Social and Science Literature Publishing, Beijing (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meagher K, Rogers M (2004) Network density and R&D spillovers. J Econ Behav Organ 53(2):237–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 41(5):673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Østergaard CR, Timmermans B, Kristinsson K (2011) Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Res Policy 40(3):500–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus PB (2000) Groups, teams and creativity: the creativity potential of ideal generation group. Appl Psychol Int Rev 49(2):237–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Zhong A (2011) A comparative analysis of key factors influencing the enterprise IT application maturity. Chin J Manag 8(4):606–613 (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Zhang G, Chen R, Tan Y (2011) Impacts of essential elements of management on IT application maturity—a perspective from firms in China. Decis Support Syst 51(1):88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad Manag J 49:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1998) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors: with a new introduction. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe RT, Linden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad Manag J 44(21):316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI (1995) Defying the crowd: cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42(1):35–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hooff B, De Ridder JA (2004) Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. J Knowl Manag 8(6):117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander AW, Elfring T (2002) Realizing innovation in services. Scand J Manag 18(2):155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Guo W, Liu X (2009) Study on the impact of group internal social network on group creativity. Soft Sci (Chinese) 23(9):25–28 (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Farr JL (1990) Innovation at work. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–13

  • Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18:293–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynder M (2007) The interaction between domain-relevant knowledge and control system design on creativity. Aust J Manag 32(1):135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia H, Cai S (2001) Effective knowledge management systems. Manag Inf Syst (Chinese) 2001(6):47–50 (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Long J (2008) A construct to measure knowledge sharing behavior in organizations. Physiol J (Chinese) 40(3):350–357 (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen R, Li S (2001) Fairness, trust, and knowledge sharing. Human Resour Manag J 1(2):69–93 (Chinese publication)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is based upon work supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Number 71072086 and the Ministry of Education of China, Humanities and Social Sciences Grant: “Impacts of Social Network on Employee Knowledge Sharing and Innovation (No. 10YJA630124).”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoying Zhang.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, J., Zhang, G., Fu, Z. et al. An empirical investigation on organizational innovation and individual creativity. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 12, 465–489 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0227-y

Keywords

Navigation