Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of long-term fatigue damage in bioprosthetic heart valves: effects of leaflet and stent elastic properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the major failure modes of bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) is noncalcific structural deterioration due to fatigue of the tissue leaflets; yet, the mechanisms of fatigue are not well understood. BHV durability is primarily assessed based on visual inspection of the leaflets following accelerated wear testing. In this study, we developed a computational framework to simulate BHV leaflet fatigue, which is both efficient and quantitative, making it an attractive alternative to traditional accelerated wear testing. We utilize a phenomenological soft tissue fatigue damage model developed previously to describe the stress softening and permanent set of the glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium leaflets in BHVs subjected to cyclic loading. A parametric study was conducted to determine the effects of altered leaflet and stent elastic properties on the fatigue of the leaflets. The simulation results show that heterogeneity of the leaflet elastic properties, poor leaflet coaptation, and little stent-tip deflection may accelerate leaflet fatigue, which agrees with clinical findings. Therefore, the developed framework may be an invaluable tool for evaluating leaflet durability in new tissue valve designs, including traditional BHVs as well as new transcatheter valves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brais MP, Bedard JP et al (1985) Ionescu–Shiley pericardial xenografts: follow-up of up to 6 years. Ann Thorac Surg 39(2):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer R, Mentzer R et al (1977) An in vivo study of the dimensional changes of the aortic valve leaflets during the cardiac cycle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 74:645–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Butany J, Nair V et al (2007) Carpentier–Edwards Perimount valves—morphological findings in surgical explants. J Cardiac Surg 22(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie GW (1992) Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 6(Suppl 1):S95–S100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley DA, Ott DA et al (1986) Ionescu–Shiley bovine pericardial bioprostheses: clinical results in 2,701 patients. In: Bodnar E, Yacoub M (eds) Biologic and bioprosthetic valves. Yorke Medical Books, New York, p 177

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfmann A, Ogden RW (2004) A constitutive model for the Mullins effect with permanent set in particle-reinforced rubber. Int J Solids Struct 41(7):1855–1878

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher AG, Lafaro RJ et al (2004) Immediate structural valve deterioration of 27-mm Carpentier–Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 77(4):1443–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (2010) Draft guidance for industry and FDA staff. Heart valves-investigational device exemption (ide) and premarket approval (pma) applications, submitted for comment, January 2010

  • Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay S, Bortolotti U et al (1984) Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu–Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position. In vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 87(6):836–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay S, Bortolotti U et al (1984) Long-term follow-up of the Ionescu–Shiley mitral pericardial xenograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 88(5 Pt 1):758–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Haziza F, Papouin G et al (1996) Tears in bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets without calcific degeneration. J Heart Valve Dis 5(1):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2005) Cardiovascular implants. Cardiac valve prostheses. ANSI/AAMI/ISO 5840

  • Kim H, Lu J et al (2008) Dynamic simulation of bioprosthetic heart valves using a stress resultant shell model. Ann Biomed Eng 36(2):262–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krucinski S, Vesely I et al (1993) Numerical simulation of leaflet flexure in bioprosthetic valves mounted on rigid and expansile stents. J Biomech 26(8):929–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machida H, Ishibashi-Ueda H et al (2001) A morphologic study of Carpentier–Edwards pericardial xenografts in the mitral position exhibiting primary tissue failure in adults in comparison with Ionescu–Shiley pericardial xenografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122(4):649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin C, Sun W (2012) Biomechanical characterization of aortic valve tissue in humans and common animal models. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 100A(6):1591–1599

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin C, Sun W (2013) Modeling of long-term fatigue damage of soft tissue with stress-softening and permanent set effects. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 12:645–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Munt B, Webb J (2006) Percutaneous valve repair and replacement techniques. Heart 92(10):1369–1372 Epub 2005 Dec 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nistal F, Artinano E et al (1986) Primary tissue valve degeneration in glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine bioprostheses: Hancock I versus Carpentier–Edwards at 4- to 7-years’ follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 42(5):568–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistal F, Garcia-Satue E et al (1986) Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between Ionescu–Shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic position. Am J Cardiol 57(1):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reul GJ Jr, Cooley DA et al (1985) Valve failure with the Ionescu–Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthesis: analysis of 2680 patients. J Vasc Surg 2(1):192–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen FJ, Fernandez J et al (1987) Causes of failure and pathologic findings in surgically removed Ionescu–Shiley standard bovine pericardial heart valve bioprostheses: emphasis on progressive structural deterioration. Circulation 76(3):618–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen FJ (1991) Pathology of bioprostheses and other tissue heart valve replacements. In: Silver MD (ed) Cardiovascular pathology, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1547–1605

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen FJ, Levy RJ (1999) Tissue heart valves: current challenges and future research perspectives. J Biomed Mater Res 47(4):439–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simo JC (1987) On a fully three-dimensional finite-strain viscoelastic damage model: formulation and computational aspects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 60(2):153–173

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal P, Luk A et al (2013) Bioprosthetic heart valves: impact of implantation on biomaterials. ISRN Biomater: 1–14

  • Smith DB, Sacks MS et al (1999) Fatigue-induced changes in bioprosthetic heart valve three-dimensional geometry and the relation to tissue damage. J Heart Valve Dis 8(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun W (2003) Biomechanical simulations of heart valve biomaterials. Department of Bioengineering. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. Doctor of Philosophy, p 240

  • Sun W, Abad A et al (2005) Simulated bioprosthetic heart valve deformation under quasi-static loading. J Biomech Eng 127(6):905–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Sacks MS (2005) Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 4(2–3):190–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Li K et al (2010) Simulated elliptical bioprosthetic valve deformation: implications for asymmetric transcatheter valve deployment. J Biomech 43(16):3085–3090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge EA, Roberts KM et al (1986) Pericardial heterografts. Toward quality control of the mechanical properties of the glutaraldehyde-fixed leaflets. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 92(1): 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge EA, Crofts CE (1987) Pericardial heterograft valves: an assessment of leaflet stresses and their implications for heart valve design. J Biomech Eng 9(4):345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesely I (2008–2011) Features of a long-lived tissue valve. Retrieved April 16, 2013, from http://www.valvexchange.com/patients/index.html

  • Vesely I (2003) The evolution of bioprosthetic heart valve design and its impact on durability. Cardiovasc Pathol 12(5):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyavahare N, Ogle M et al (1999) Mechanisms of bioprosthetic heart valve failure: fatigue causes collagen denaturation and glycosaminoglycan loss. J Biomed Mater Res 46:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley VM, Keon CA et al (1992) Ionescu–Shiley valve failure II: experience with 25 low-profile expiants. Ann Thorac Surg 54(1):117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb J, Pasupati S et al (2007) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 7(116):755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research for this project was funded in part by NIH HL104080 and HL108240 grants. Caitlin Martin is also supported by a NIH NRSA predoctoral fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, C., Sun, W. Simulation of long-term fatigue damage in bioprosthetic heart valves: effects of leaflet and stent elastic properties. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13, 759–770 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0532-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0532-x

Keywords

Navigation