Abstract
Knowledge of cell mechanical properties, such as elastic modulus, is essential to understanding the mechanisms by which cells carry out many integrated functions in health and disease. Cellular stiffness is regulated by the composition, structural organization, and indigenous mechanical stress (or prestress) borne by the cytoskeleton. Current methods for measuring stiffness and cytoskeletal prestress of living cells necessitate either limited spatial resolution but with high speed, or spatial maps of the entire cell at the expense of long imaging times. We have developed a novel technique, called biomechanical imaging, for generating maps of both cellular stiffness and prestress that requires less than 30 s of interrogation time, but which provides subcellular spatial resolution. The technique is based on the ability to measure tractions applied to the cell while simultaneously observing cell deformation, combined with capability to solve an elastic inverse problem to find cell stiffness and prestress distributions. We demonstrated the application of this technique by carrying out detailed mapping of the shear modulus and cytoskeletal prestress distributions of 3T3 fibroblasts, making no assumptions regarding those distributions or the correlation between them. We also showed that on the whole cell level, the average shear modulus is closely associated with the average prestress, which is consistent with the data from the literature. Data collection is a straightforward procedure that lends itself to other biochemical/biomechanical interventions. Biomechanical imaging thus offers a new tool that can be used in studies of cell biomechanics and mechanobiology where fast imaging of cell properties and prestress is desired at subcellular resolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbone PE, Gokhale NH (2004) Elastic modulus imaging: on the uniqueness and nonuniqueness of the elastography inverse problem in two dimensions. Inverse Probl 20(1):283–296
Barbone PE, Oberai AA (2007) Elastic modulus imaging: some exact solutions of the compressible elastography inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 52(6):1577–1593. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/003
Barbone PE, Oberai AA (2010) A review of the mathematical and computational foundations of biomechanical imaging. computational modeling in biomechanics 375–408. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3575-2_13
Butler JP, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Fabry B, Fredberg JJ (2002) Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282(3):C595–C605. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00270.2001
Byrd RH, Lu PH, Nocedal J, Zhu CY (1995) A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. Siam J Sci Comput 16(5):1190–1208. doi:10.1137/0916069
Chen C, Krishnan R, Zhou E, Ramachandran A, Tambe D, Rajendran K, Adam RM, Deng L, Fredberg JJ (2010) Fluidization and resolidification of the human bladder smooth muscle cell in response to transient stretch. PloS one 5(8):e12035. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012035
Dembo M, Wang YL (1999) Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys J 76(4):2307–2316. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77386-8
Fernandez P, Pullarkat PA, Ott A (2006) A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts. Biophys J 90(10):3796–3805. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.072215
Gao L, Parker KJ, Lerner RM, Levinson SF (1996) Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue-a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 22(8):959–977
Goenezen S, Barbone P, Oberai AA (2011) Solution of the nonlinear elasticity imaging inverse problem: the incompressible case. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(13–16):1406–1420. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.018
Gonzalez-Cruz RD, Fonseca VC, Darling EM (2012) Cellular mechanical properties reflect the differentiation potential of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 109(24):E1523–1529. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120349109
Greenleaf JF, Fatemi M, Insana M (2003) Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 5:57–78. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.040202.121623
Guo Q, Xia Y, Sandig M, Yang J (2012) Characterization of cell elasticity correlated with cell morphology by atomic force microscope. J Biomech 45(2):304–309. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.031
Heidemann SR, Wirtz D (2004) Towards a regional approach to cell mechanics. Trends Cell Biol 14(4):160–166. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2004.02.003
Hoffman BD, Crocker JC (2009) Cell mechanics: dissecting the physical responses of cells to force. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 11:259–288. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160511
Hu S, Chen J, Fabry B, Numaguchi Y, Gouldstone A, Ingber DE, Fredberg JJ, Butler JP, Wang N (2003) Intracellular stress tomography reveals stress focusing and structural anisotropy in cytoskeleton of living cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285(5):C1082–1090. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00159.2003
Hubmayr RD, Shore SA, Fredberg JJ, Planus E, Panettieri RA Jr, Moller W, Heyder J, Wang N (1996) Pharmacological activation changes stiffness of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 271(5 Pt 1):C1660–1668
Ingber DE (1993) Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 104(Pt 3):613–627
Janmey PA, McCulloch CA (2007) Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 9(1):1–34
Kole TP, Tseng Y, Jiang I, Katz JL, Wirtz D (2005) Intracellular mechanics of migrating fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell 16(1):328–338. doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-06-0485
Krishnan R, Park CY, Lin YC, Mead J, Jaspers RT, Trepat X, Lenormand G, Tambe D, Smolensky AV, Knoll AH, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ (2009) Reinforcement versus fluidization in cytoskeletal mechanoresponsiveness. PloS one 4(5):e5486. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005486
Lam RH, Weng S, Lu W, Fu J (2012) Live-cell subcellular measurement of cell stiffness using a microengineered stretchable micropost array membrane. Int Biol Quant Biosci Nano Macro 4(10):1289–1298. doi:10.1039/c2ib20134h
Mahaffy RE, Park S, Gerde E, Kas J, Shih CK (2004) Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 86(3):1777–1793. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74245-9
Maloney JM, Walton EB, Bruce CM, Van Vliet KJ (2008) Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 78(4 Pt 1):041923
Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL (1995) Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science (New York, NY) 269(5232):1854–1857
Nelson CM, Jean RP, Tan JL, Liu WF, Sniadecki NJ, Spector AA, Chen CS (2005) From the cover: emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102(33):11594–11599
Oberai AA, Gokhale NH, Doyley MM, Bamber JC (2004) Evaluation of the adjoint equation based algorithm for elasticity imaging. Phys Med Biol 49(13):2955–2974
Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13(2):111–134
Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, Kallel F, Konofagou E, Krouskop T, Varghese T (1999) Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 213(3):203–233
Park S, Koch D, Cardenas R, Kas J, Shih CK (2005) Cell motility and local viscoelasticity of fibroblasts. Biophys J 89(6):4330–4342. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.053462
Park CY, Tambe D, Alencar AM, Trepat X, Zhou EH, Millet E, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ (2010) Mapping the cytoskeletal prestress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 298(5):C1245–1252. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00417.2009
Parker KJ, Gao L, Lerner RM, Levinson SF (1996) Techniques for elastic imaging: a review. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 15:52–59
Parker KJ, Taylor LS, Gracewski S, Rubens DJ (2005) A unified view of imaging the elastic properties of tissue. J Acoust Soc Am 117(5):2705–2712
Parker KJ, Doyley MM, Rubens DJ (2011) Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective. Phys Med Biol 56(1):R1–R29. doi:10.1088/00319155/56/1/R01
Persson PO, Strang G (2004) A simple mesh generator in MATLAB. Siam Rev 46(2):329–345. doi:10.1137/S0036144503429121
Plodinec M, Loparic M, Monnier CA, Obermann EC, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Oertle P, Hyotyla JT, Aebi U, Bentires-Alj M, Lim RY, Schoenenberger CA (2012) The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol 7(11):757–765. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.167
Polio SR, Rothenberg KE, Stamenović D, Smith ML (2012) A micropatterning and image processing approach to simplify measurement of cellular traction forces. Acta Biomater 8(1):82–88. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.013
Pollard TD, Borisy GG (2003) Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112(4):453 –465 doi10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00120-X
Pourati J, Maniotis A, Spiegel D, Schaffer JL, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ, Ingber DE, Stamenović D, Wang N (1998) Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 274(5):C1283–C1289
Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S, Kam Z, Geiger B, Bershadsky AD (2001) Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol 153(6):1175–1186
Seifriz W (1924) An elastic value of protoplasm, with further observations on the viscosity of protoplasm. J Exp Biol 2(1):1–11
Smith BA, Tolloczko B, Martin JG, Grutter P (2005) Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: stiffening induced by contractile agonist. Biophys J 88(4):2994–3007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.046649
Solon J, Levental I, Sengupta K, Georges PC, Janmey PA (2007) Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J 93(12):4453–4461
Stamenović D, Ingber DE (2002) Models of cytoskeletal mechanics of adherent cells. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 1(1):95–108. doi:10.1007/s10237-002-0009-9
Stamenović D, Suki B, Fabry B, Wang N, Fredberg JJ (2004) Rheology of airway smooth muscle cells is associated with cytoskeletal contractile stress. J Appl Physiol 96(5):1600–1605. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00595.2003
Tambe DT, Croutelle U, Trepat X, Park CY, Kim JH, Millet E, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ (2013) Monolayer stress microscopy: limitations, artifacts, and accuracy of recovered intercellular stresses. PloS one 8(2):e55172. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055172PONE-D-12-23633
Tan JL, Tien J, Pirone DM, Gray DS, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS (2003) Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100(4):1484–1489. doi:10.1073/pnas.0235407100
Trepat X, Wasserman MR, Angelini TE, Millet E, Weitz DA, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ (2009) Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat Phys 5(6):426–430. doi:10.1038/Nphys1269
Wang N, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Chen J, Mijailovich SM, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ, Stamenović D (2002) Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282(3):C606–616. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00269.2001
Wang N, Naruse K, Stamenović D, Fredberg JJ, Mijailovich SM, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Polte T, Mannix R, Ingber DE (2001) Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98:7765–7770
Wirtz D (2009) Particle-tracking microrheology of living cells: principles and applications. Ann Rev Biophys 38:301–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.050708.133724
Zheng XY, Zhang X (2008) Optical moire as a visualization tool for living vascular cell contraction force mapping. Appl Phys Lett 93(16). doi:10.1063/1.3006430
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by NSF CBET Grant 1150467 and an Innovation Career Development Professorship from Boston University (MLS), NHLBI Grant HL-096005 (DS), NCI-R01CA140271 (PEB, AAO), and NSF SI2 Grant #1148111 (PEB, AAO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Elizabeth P. Canović and D. Thomas Seidl have contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canović, E.P., Seidl, D.T., Polio, S.R. et al. Biomechanical imaging of cell stiffness and prestress with subcellular resolution. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13, 665–678 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0526-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0526-8