Skip to main content
Log in

Helical flows and asymmetry of blood jet in dilated ascending aorta with normally functioning bicuspid valve

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with aortic dilatation and aneurysm. Several studies evidenced an eccentric systolic flow in ascending aorta associated with increased wall shear stresses (WSS) and the occurrence of an helical systolic flow. This study seeks to elucidate the connections between jet asymmetry and helical flow in patients with normally functioning BAV and dilated ascending aorta. We performed a computational parametric study by varying, for a patient-specific geometry, the valve area and the flow rate entering the aorta and drawing also a tricuspid valve (TAV). We considered also phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging of four BAV and TAV patients. Measurement of normalized flow asymmetry index, systolic WSS and of a new index (positive helix fraction, PHF) quantifying the presence of a single a single helical flow were performed. In our computation, BAV cases featured higher values of all indices with respect to TAV in both numerical and imaged-based results. Moreover, all indices increased with decreasing valve area and/or with increasing flow rate. This allowed to separate the BAV and TAV cases with respect to the jet asymmetry, WSS localization and helical flow. Interestingly, these results were obtained without modeling the leaflets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman D (2008) An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 46: 1097–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes C, Hansen M, Tsao J, Kozerke S, Rezavi R, Pedersen E, Boesiger P (2008) Determination of peak velocity in stenotic areas: echocardiography versus kt sense accelerated mr fourier velocity encoding1. Radiology 246(1): 249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker A, Markl M (2011) Editorial: the role of hemodynamics in bicuspid aortic valve disease. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 39(6): 805–806. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker A, Lanning C, Shandas R (2010) Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast mri. Ann Biomed Eng 38(3): 788–800. doi:10.1007/s10439-009-9854-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker AJ, Markl M, Bürk J, Lorenz R, Bock J, Bauer S, Schulz-Menger J, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Clinical perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5(4): 457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer M, Siniawski H, Pasic M, Schaumann B, Hetzer R (2006) Different hemodynamic stress of the ascending aorta wall in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. J Cardiac Surg 21(3): 218–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beroukhim RS, Kruzick TL, Taylor AL, Gao D, Yetman AT (2006) Progression of aortic dilation in children with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 98(6): 828–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Rajamannan N, Sucosky P (2012) Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease. Biomech Modeling Mechanobiol. doi:10.1007/s10237-012-0375-x

  • Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 130: 078001-1–078001-4. doi:10.1115/1.2960953

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Corte A, Quarto C, Bancone C, Castaldo C, Di Meglio F, Nurzynska D, De Santo L, De Feo M, Scardone M, Montagnani S et al (2008) Spatiotemporal patterns of smooth muscle cell changes in ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: focus on cell-matrix signaling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(1): 8–18. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Corte A, Bancone C, Conti C, Votta E, Redaelli A, Del Viscovo L, Cotrufo M (2011) Restricted cusp motion in right-left type of bicuspid aortic valves: a new risk marker for aortopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031

  • Den Reijer P, Sallee D III, Van Der Velden P, Zaaijer E, Parks W, Ramamurthy S, Robbie T, Donati G, Lamphier C, Beekman R et al (2010) Hemodynamic predictors of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12(4). doi:10.1186/1532-429X-12-4

  • Formaggia, L, Quarteroni, A, Veneziani, A (eds) (2009) Cardiovascular mathematics: modeling and simulation of the circulatory system, modeling, simulation and applications, vol 1. Springer, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles R, Martin R, Abrams J, Schapira J, French J, Popp R (1979) Two-dimensional echocardiographic features of bicuspid aortic valve. Chest 75(4): 434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girdauskas E, Borger M, Secknus M, Girdauskas G, Kuntze T (2011) Is aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve disease a congenital defect or a result of abnormal hemodynamics? A critical reappraisal of a one-sided argument. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 39(6): 809–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn R, Roman M, Mogtadek A, Devereux R (1992) Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 19(2): 283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haycock G, Schwartz G, Wisotsky D (1978) Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Pediatr 93(1): 62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope T, Markl M, Wigström L, Alley M, Miller D, Herfkens R (2007) Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(6): 1471–1479. doi:10.1002/jmri.21082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope M, Hope T, Meadows A, Ordovas K, Urbania T, Alley M, Higgins C (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional mr evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns1. Radiology 255(1): 53–61. doi:10.1148/radiol.09091437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope M, Hope T, Crook S, Ordovas K, Urbania T, Alley M, Higgins C (2011) 4d flow cmr in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(7): 781–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moireau P, Xiao N, Astorino M, Figueroa CA, Chapelle D, Taylor CA, Gerbeau JF (2012) External tissue support and fluidstructure simulation in blood flows. Biomech Modeling Mechanobiol 11(1–2): 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morbiducci U, Gallo D, Ponzini R, Massai D, Antiga L, Montevecchi FM, Redaelli A (2010) Quantitative analysis of bulk flow in image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: the influence of outflow conditions as test case. Ann Biomed Eng 38(12): 3688–3705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols W, O’Rourke M (1998) Mcdonalds blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkomo V, Enriquez-Sarano M, Ammash N, Melton L, Bailey K, Desjardins V, Horn R, Tajik A (2003) Bicuspid aortic valve associated with aortic dilatation. Arteriosclerosis Thromb Vasc Biol 23(2): 351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman M, Devereux R, Kramer-Fox R, O’Loughlin J (1989) Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 64(8): 507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers HH, Sievers HL (2011) Aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve diseasegenes or hemodynamics? or Scylla and Charybdis?. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 39(6): 803–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigovan M, Hope M, Dyverfeldt P, Saloner D (2011) Comparison of four-dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 34: 1226–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara C, Viscardi F, Antiga L, Luciani GB (2011) Influence of bicuspid valve geometry on ascending aortic fluid dynamics: a parametric study. Artif Organs 36(4): 368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscardi F, Vergara C, Antiga L, Merelli S, Veneziani A, Puppini G, Faggian G, Mazzucco A, Luciani GB (2010) Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. Artif Organs 34(12): 1114–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Faggiano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faggiano, E., Antiga, L., Puppini, G. et al. Helical flows and asymmetry of blood jet in dilated ascending aorta with normally functioning bicuspid valve. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12, 801–813 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0444-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0444-1

Keywords

Navigation