Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear viscoelastic, thermodynamically consistent, models for biological soft tissue

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of most biological soft tissue is nonlinear viscoelastic rather than elastic. Many of the models previously proposed for soft tissue involve ad hoc systems of springs and dashpots or require measurement of time-dependent constitutive coefficient functions. The model proposed here is a system of evolution differential equations, which are determined by the long-term behavior of the material as represented by an energy function of the type used for elasticity. The necessary empirical data is time independent and therefore easier to obtain. These evolution equations, which represent non-equilibrium, transient responses such as creep, stress relaxation, or variable loading, are derived from a maximum energy dissipation principle, which supplements the second law of thermodynamics. The evolution model can represent both creep and stress relaxation, depending on the choice of control variables, because of the assumption that a unique long-term manifold exists for both processes. It succeeds, with one set of material constants, in reproducing the loading–unloading hysteresis for soft tissue. The models are thermodynamically consistent so that, given data, they may be extended to the temperature-dependent behavior of biological tissue, such as the change in temperature during uniaxial loading. The Holzapfel et al. three-dimensional two-layer elastic model for healthy artery tissue is shown to generate evolution equations by this construction for biaxial loading of a flat specimen. A simplified version of the Shah–Humphrey model for the elastodynamical behavior of a saccular aneurysm is extended to viscoelastic behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony RL, Caston RH, Guth E (1942) Equations of state for natural and synthetic rubber-like materials. I. J Phys Chem 46:826–840

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Apter JT (1964) Mathematical development of a physical model of some visco-elastic properties of the aorta. Bull Math Biophys 26:267–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter JT, Marquez E (1968) Correlation of visco-elastic properties of large arteries with microscopic structure. IV. Circ Res 22:393–404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apter JT, Rabinowitz M, Cummings DH (1966) Correlation of visco-elastic properties of large arteries with microscopic structure. I, II, III. Circ Res 19:104–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MB, Ker RF, Dimery NJ, Alexander RMcN (1986) Mechanical properties of various mammalian tendons. J Zool Lond A 209:537–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet J (2001) Large strain viscoelastic constitutive models. Int J Solids Struct 38:2953–2968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman BD (1964) Thermodynamics of materials with memory. Arch Ration Mech Anal 17:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Decraemer WF, Maes MA, Vanhuyse VJ, Vanpeperstraete P (1980) A non-linear viscoelastic constitutive equation for soft biological tissues, based upon a structural model. J Biomech 13:559–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fung YC (1972) Stress–strain history relations of soft tissues in simple elongation. In: Fung YC, Perrone N, Anliker M (eds) Biomechanics: its foundations and objectives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 181–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung YC (1973) Biorheology of soft tissues. Biorheology 10:139–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics. Mechanical properties of living tissues, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gow BS, Taylor MG (1968) Measurement of viscoelastic properties of arteries in the living dog. Circ Res 23:111–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guth E, Wack PE, Antony RL (1946) Significance of the equation of state for rubber. J Appl Phys 17:347–351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haslach HW Jr (1997) Geometrical structure of the non-equilibrium thermodynamics of homogeneous systems. Rep Math Phys 39(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslach HW Jr (2002) A non-equilibrium thermodynamic geometric structure for thermoviscoplasticity with maximum dissipation. Int J Plast 18(2):127–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslach HW Jr, Zeng N-N (1999) Maximum dissipation evolution equations for nonlinear thermoviscoelasticity. Int J Non-linear Mech 34:361–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Stadler M (2002) A structural model for the viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls: continuum formulation and finite element analysis. Eur J Mech A/Solids 21:441–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Vawter DL, Vito RP (1987) Pseudoelasticity of excised visceral pleura. J Biomech 109:115–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FCP (1992) A constitutive theory for biomembranes: application to epicardal mechanics. J Biomech Eng 114:461–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou SK, Humphrey JD (1996) Influence of size, shape and properties on the mechanics of axisymmetric saccular aneurysms. J Biomech 29(8):1015–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanir Y (1983) Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J Biomech 16:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden RW (1972) Large deformation isotropic elasticity—on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc Lond A 326:565–584

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel DJ, Tucker WK, Janicki JS (1970) Dynamic elastic properties of the aorta in the radial direction. J Appl Physiol 28:578–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins RW (1983) Models for predicting the elastic, viscoelastic, and inelastic mechanical behavior of paper and board. In: Mark RE (ed) Chapter 2 in Handbook of physical and mechanical testing of paper and paperboard, vol 1, Marcel Dekker, NY

  • Rigby BJ (1964) The effect of mechanical extension upon the thermal stability of collagen. Biochim et Biophys Acta 79:634–636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa E Jr, Altenberger AR, Dahler JS (1992) Model calculations based on a new theory of rubber elasticity. Acta Phys Pol B 23:337–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy CS (1880) The elastic properties of the arterial wall. J Physiol 3:125–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott S, Ferguson GG, Roach MR (1972) Comparison of the elastic properties of human intracranial arteries and aneurysms. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 50:328–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah AD, Humphrey JD (1999) Finite strain elastodynamics of intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Biomech 32:593–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skalak R, Rachev A, Tozeren A (1975) Stress–strain relations for membranes under finite deformations. Bulg Acad Sci: Biomech 2:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger HJ, Aaslid R, Keller S, Reulen H-J (1989) Strength, elasticity and viscoelastic properties of cerebral aneurysms. Heart Vessels 5:41–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka TT, Fung YC (1974) Elastic and inelastic properties of the canine aorta and their variations along the aortic tree. J Biomechan 7:357–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka E, Yamada H (1990) An inelastic constitutive model of blood vessels. Acta Mech 82:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong P, Fung YC (1978) The stress–strain relationship for the skin. J Biomechanics 9:649–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truesdell C (1984) Rational thermodynamics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Viidik A (1968) A rheological model for uncalcified parallel-fibered collogeneous tissue. J Biomech 1:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo SL-Y, Simon BR, Kuel SC, Akeson WH (1980) Quasi-linear viscoelastic properties of normal articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng 102:85–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry W. Haslach Jr.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Evolution equation when the strain energy is a function of a tensor

Let E be a second order tensor of state variables, and let H be the second order tensor of conjugate control variables. Assume that the energy function has the form

$$ \psi ({\mathbf{E}};{\mathbf{H}}) = \phi ({\mathbf{E}}) + {\mathbf{E}}:{\mathbf{H}}. $$

The affinities are the second order tensor, X=∂ψ/∂E. The affinities are a function of E, so that X=h(E). Assume that h is invertible so that ψ(E; H) can be written in terms of the affinities for fixed control variables, \(\bar \psi ({\mathbf{X}};{\mathbf{H}}).\)

The gradient dissipation condition (Eq. 5) is that the evolution of the affinities obeys \({\mathbf{\dot X}} = - k\partial \bar \psi /\partial {\mathbf{X}}\) for fixed controls, where \({\mathbf{\dot X}}\) is a second order tensor. By the chain rule,

$$ {\mathbf{\dot X}} = \frac{{\partial {\mathbf{X}}}} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}{\mathbf{\dot E}}. $$
(43)

Here ∂X/∂E is a fourth order tensor. Again by the chain rule,

$$ \frac{{\partial \bar \psi }} {{\partial {\mathbf{X}}}} = \frac{{\partial \psi }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}} {{\partial {\mathbf{X}}}}. $$
(44)

Substitution of Eqs. 43 and 44 into \({\mathbf{\dot X}} = - k\partial \bar \psi /\partial {\mathbf{X}}\) yields the evolution equation in terms of the state variables,

$$ {\mathbf{\dot E}} = - k\left( {\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{X}}}} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}} \right)^{ - 2} \frac{{\partial \psi }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}} = - k\left( {\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{X}}}} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}} \right)^{ - 2} \left( {\frac{{\partial \phi }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}} + {\mathbf{H}}} \right). $$
(45)

This form reduces to that of Eq. 6 in the case that E has only diagonal non-zero entries. Then H also has only diagonal non-zero entries. The affinity is a second order tensor defined by

$$ ({\mathbf{X}})_{ij} = \left( {\frac{{\partial \psi }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}} \right)_{ij} = \frac{{\partial \psi }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}_{ij} . $$
(46)

If ψ only depends on E11, E22, and E33, then the only non-zero terms of X are the three terms X ii .

The fourth order tensor ∂X/∂E is defined by

$$ \left( {\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{X}}}} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}} \right)_{ijkm} = \frac{{\partial {\mathbf{X}}_{ij} }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}_{km} }}. $$
(47)

The only non-zero terms of this tensor, if only the diagonal entries of E are non-zero, have the form

$$ \left( {\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{X}}}} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}}}} \right)_{iikk} = \frac{{\partial {\mathbf{X}}_{ii} }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}_{kk} }} = \frac{{\partial ^2 \psi }} {{\partial {\mathbf{E}}_{ii} \partial {\mathbf{E}}_{kk} }}. $$
(48)

The evolution equation therefore has the form of Eq. 6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haslach, H.W. Nonlinear viscoelastic, thermodynamically consistent, models for biological soft tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3, 172–189 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-004-0055-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-004-0055-6

Keywords

Navigation