Abstract
In estuaries and coastal waters, floc size and its statistical distributions of cohesive sediments are of primary importance, due to their effects on the settling velocity and thus deposition rates of cohesive aggregates. The development of a robust flocculation model that includes the predictions of floc size distributions (FSDs), however, is still in a research stage. In this study, a one-dimensional longitudinal (1-DL) flocculation model along a streamtube is developed. This model is based on solving the population balance equation to find the FSDs by using the quadrature method of moments. To validate this model, a laboratory experiment is carried out to produce an advection transport-dominant environment in a cylindrical tank. The flow field is generated by a marine pump mounted at the bottom center, with its outlet facing upward. This setup generates an axially symmetric flow which is measured by an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV). The measurement results provide the hydrodynamic input data required for this 1-DL model. The other measurement results, the FSDs, are acquired by using an automatic underwater camera system and the resulting images are analyzed to validate the predicted FSDs. This study shows that the FSDs as well as their representative sizes can be efficiently and reasonably simulated by this 1-DL model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbot E, Dussouillez P, Bottero JY, Moulin P (2010) Coagulation of bentonite suspension by polyelectrolytes or ferric chloride: floc breakage and reformation. Chem Eng J 156(1):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.001
Bubakova P, Pivokonsky M, Pivokonsky R, Filip P (2013) The effect of shear rate on aggregate size distribution and structure at steady state: a comparison between a Taylor–Couette reactor and a mixing tank. J Water Supply Res T 62(5):288–295. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2013.005
Chisholm TA (1999) A two-component aggregation model. Dissertation, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary
Colomer J, Peters F, Marrase C (2005) Experimental analysis of coagulation of particles under low-shear flow. Water Res 39:2994–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.076
Ducoste JJ, Clark MM, Weetman RJ (1997) Turbulence in flocculators: the effects of tank size and impeller type. AICHE J 43(2):328–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690430206
Feddersen F (2010) Quality controlling surf zone acoustic Doppler velocimeter observations to estimate the turbulent dissipation rate. J Atmos Ocean Tech 27(12):2039–2055. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHO783.1
Frappier G, Lartiges BS, Skali-Lami S (2010) Floc cohesive force in reversible aggregation: a Couette laminar flow investigation. Langmuir 26(13):10475–10488. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9046947
Fugate DC (2002) Estuarine suspended aggregate dynamics and characteristics. Dissertation, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary
Ge CY, Wang JJ, Gu XP, Feng LF (2014) CFD simulation and PIV measurement of the flow field generated by modified pitched blade turbine impellers. Chem Eng Res Des 92(6):1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.08.024
Ha HK (2008) Acoustic measurements of cohesive sediment transport: suspension to consolidation. Dissertation, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary
Keyvani A, Strom K (2013) A fully-automated image processing technique to improve measurement of suspended particles and flocs by removing out-of-focus objects. Comput Geosci 52:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.018
Keyvani A, Strom K (2014) Influence of cycles of high and low turbulent shear on the growth rate and equilibrium size of mud flocs. Mar Geol 354:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2014.04.010
Kolmogorov AN (1941) The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences 30: 9−13. (in Russian, reprinted in 1991 in English. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 434: 9–13)
Kumar RG, Strom KB, Keyvani A (2010) Floc properties and settling velocity of San Jacinto estuary mud under variable shear and salinity conditions. Cont Shelf Res 30(20):2067–2081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2010.10.006
Lee BJ, Toorman E, Molz FJ, Wang J (2011) A two-class population balance equation yielding bimodal flocculation of marine or estuarine sediments. Water Res 45(5):2131–2145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.028
Levich VG (1962) Physicochemical hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall, Inc
Lien RC, D'Asaro EA (2006) Measurement of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate with a Lagrangian float. J Atmos Ocean Tech 23(7):964–976. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1890.1
Liu H, Wu C, Ren J (2011) Estimation of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in the bottom boundary layer of the Pearl River estuary. China Ocean Eng 25(4):669–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-011-0053-2
Lumley JL, Terray EA (1983) Kinematics of turbulence convected by a random wave field. J Phys Oceanogr 13(11):2000–2007. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013<2000:KOTCBA>2.0.CO;2
Maggi F, Mietta F, Winterwerp JC (2007) Effect of variable fractal dimension on the floc size distribution of suspended cohesive sediment. J Hydrol 343(1−2, 43):–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.035
Martin V, Fisher TSR, Millar RG, Quick MC (2002) ADV data analysis for turbulent flows: low correlation problem. Hydraul Meas Exp Methods:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40655(2002)101
McAnally WH (2000) Aggregation and deposition of estuarial fine sediment. Dissertation, University of Florida
Mehta AJ (2013) An introduction to hydraulics of fine sediment transport. World Scientific Publishing Company
Mietta F, Chassagne C, Winterwerp JC (2009) Shear-induced flocculation of a suspension of kaolinite as function of pH and salt concentration. J Colloid Interf Sci 336(1):134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.044
Mietta F (2010) Evolution of the floc size distribution of cohesive sediments. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Nimmo Smith WAM, Katz J, Osborn TR (2005) On the structure of turbulence in the bottom boundary layer of the coastal ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 35:72–93. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-2673.1
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran: the art of scientific computing, 2ed edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pujol D, Colomer J, Serra T, Casamitjana X (2010) Effect of submerged aquatic vegetation on turbulence induced by an oscillating grid. Cont Shelf Res 30(9):1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2010.02.014
Rodi W (1993) Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics. International Association for Hydraulic Research, 3rd edn. Balkema, Delft
Saarenrinne P, Piirto M (2000) Turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate estimation from PIV velocity vector fields. Exp Fluids 29(1):S300–S307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480070032
Sack RA, Donovan AF (1972) An algorithm for Gaussian quadrature given modified moments. Numer Math 18(5):465–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406683
Serra T, Colomer J, Logan BE (2008) Efficiency of different shear devices on flocculation. Water Res 42(4−5):1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.027
Shao Y, Shen X, Maa JPY, Shen J (2017) Simulating high ebb currents in the north passage of the Yangtze estuary using a vertical 1-D model. Estuar Coast Shelf S 196:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.08.001
Shen X (2016) Modeling flocculation and deflocculation processes of cohesive sediments. Dissertation, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary
Shen X, Maa JPY (2015) Modeling floc size distribution of suspended cohesive sediments using quadrature method of moments. Mar Geol 359:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2014.11.014
Shen X, Maa JPY (2016a) A camera and image processing system for floc size distributions of suspended particles. Mar Geol 376:132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2016.03.009
Shen X, Maa JPY (2016b) Numerical simulations of particle size distributions: comparison with analytical solutions and kaolinite flocculation experiments. Mar Geol 379:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2016.05.014
Smoluchowski M (1917) Versuch einer Mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik Kolloider Lösungen. Z Phys Chem 92:129–168 (in German)
SonTek (2001) ADV field acoustic Doppler velocimeter: technical documentation. SonTek/YSI Inc., California
Tennekes H, Lumley JL (1972) A first course in turbulence. Press, M.I.T
Thomas DN, Judd SJ, Fawcett N (1999) Flocculation modelling: a review. Water Res 33(7):1579–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00392-3
Thomson J, Polagye B, Durgesh V, Richmond MC (2012) Measurements of turbulence at two tidal energy sites in Puget Sound, WA. IEEE J Ocean Eng 37(3):363–374. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2012.2191656
Van Leussen W (1994) Estuarine macroflocs and their role in fine-grained sediment transport. Dissertation, University of Utrecht, Netherlands
Vlieghe M, Coufort-Saudejaud C, Frances C, Line A (2014) In situ characterization of floc morphology by image analysis in a turbulent Taylor–Couette reactor. AICHE J 60(7):2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14431
Wheeler JC (1974) Modified moments and Gaussian quadratures. Rocky Mt J Math 4(2):287–296. https://doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-1974-4-2-287
Winterwerp JC (1999) On the dynamics of high-concentrated mud suspensions. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Winterwerp JC, van Kesteren WGM (2004) Introduction to the physics of cohesive sediment in the marine environment. In: van Loon T (ed) WL/Delft Hydraulics & Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Wyatt NB, O'Hern TJ, Shelden B, Hughes LG, Mondy LA (2013) Size and structure of Chlorella zofingiensis/FeCl3 flocs in a shear flow. Biotechnol Bioeng 110(12):3156–3163. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24996
Yuan Y, Farnood RR (2010) Strength and breakage of activated sludge flocs. Powder Technol 199(2):111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.11.021
Zhu Z, Yu J, Wang H, Dou J, Wang C (2015) Fractal dimension of cohesive sediment flocs at steady state under seven shear flow conditions. Water 7(8):4385–4408. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7084385
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the associated editor for their helpful comments for improving this manuscript. This paper is Contribution No. 3653 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary.
Funding
This work and analysis was supported by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) Student Research Grant, a research grant (Contract number: 774080) from Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), China Scholarship Council (CSC) scholarship, the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (Grant No. 41230640 & 51339005), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51409081).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Erik A Toorman
This article is part of the Topical Collection on the 13th International Conference on Cohesive Sediment Transport in Leuven, Belgium 7–11 September 2015
Appendix A Details of the underwater camera system
Appendix A Details of the underwater camera system
This system was developed to measure the FSDs of kaolinite suspensions. This camera system is improved based on that given by Shen and Maa (2016a). It includes a Sony Alpha NEX-5R camera body with 4912 × 3264 pixels for images, a NEX E mount to Nikon F mount adaptor, three Kenko extension tubes (36 + 20 + 12 mm), a Nikon Macro Nikor 55 mm lens, and a +10 close-up lens that mounted sequentially (Fig. 14). These settings magnify the subject, from a subject size of 10.7 × 7.2 mm to an image size of 23.5 × 15.6 mm, i.e., a subject-to-image ratio (SIR) of 1: 2.2, and thus, changes the resolution from 4.8 μm per pixel to 2.2 μm per pixel. Using at least 2 × 2 pixels to identify a floc, the minimum sphere equivalent floc size that can be identified by this camera system is around 5 μm, which is roughly consistent with the primary particle median size of cohesive sediment minerals in the natural environment. The shutter speed is set to 1/1000 s to catch the fast moving particles, the aperture is set at the maximum, f/2.8, to receive more lights and to limit the focus depth to about 2 mm. The ISO is set to 100 to minimize noise which may be considered as primary particles or small flocs. The trigger to take pictures is controlled by a commercially available remote control unit which is powered and controlled via a four-pin connector, J2, on the control board.
The major improvement on the current system is to replace the original LED light source by a 150 mW green laser module with a concave lens to spread the laser light. This laser module is mounted on the same side of the camera lens (i.e., front illumination) and points to the center of the image window. It is connected and controlled by the control board via a three-pin connector, J1. The above components are assembled and protected in a PVC tube with one cover made by PVC plate, and the other made by a 23-mm-thick plexiglass plate to allow pictures to be taken. Through air dielectric, the distance between the subject and lens (DSL) is slightly larger than 23 mm, but it increases to 29 mm when the plexiglass cover is placed between the lens and the subject. This gives around 5 mm distance between the cover and the front of the camera lens to take pictures for any subject that is within 1 mm of the other side of the plexiglass cover. The power for this camera system is provided by a set of four 18,650 lithium rechargeable batteries (i.e., 16VDC) inside the PVC tube via the connector, J3. This power is converted to 3.7 V to provide power for the laser source, converted to 5 V for the microcontroller, and converted to 3 V for the camera remote control. A magnetic switch which is attached on the PVC cover can be turned on if a magnetic bar is placed on the other side of the PVC cover. Once the switch is closed, the microcontroller begins to work following the instruction of the control program. This program generates periodic pulses which are fed into the gate of two field effect transistors (FETs), (i.e., 2N7000 and RFP2N08L, respectively) which behave as two electronic switches, K1 and K2. The timing of these two pulses match so that when the camera is taking images, the laser light is on. The program is set to take pictures every 2 s until the battery for the camera is exhausted. Nevertheless, this system operates for about 3 h before the batteries need to be changed. This working duration is sufficient for the current application, and much longer than the previous system (Shen and Maa 2016a) that uses LED light source. For field measurements in a typical tidal estuary, more improvements can be arranged to extend the operation duration. Finally, the acquired floc images are processed using the MATLAB Image Processing toolbox to statistically find the FSDs (Shen and Maa 2016a).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, X., Maa, J.PY. Floc size distributions of suspended kaolinite in an advection transport dominated tank: measurements and modeling. Ocean Dynamics 67, 1495–1510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1097-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1097-5