Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laboratory and Field-scale Evaluation of Low-pH Fe(II) Oxidation at Hughes Borehole, Portage, Pennsylvania

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Mine Water and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Hughes Borehole is located in the bituminous coal region of south-central Pennsylvania and drains an underground mine complex of ca. 2,950 ha. The borehole discharge averages approximately 63 L/s of acidic (pH 4, 230 mg/L acidity) mine drainage that contains elevated concentrations of Fe(II) (100 mg/L). Long-term monitoring of the site showed that biological Fe(II) oxidation occurred without human intervention and, over previous decades, has produced a 0.6 ha iron mound up to 2 m deep. On-mound channel reactors along with laboratory-scale gutter reactors were constructed to determine conditions that can exploit biological Fe(II) oxidation for passive treatment. Dissolved Fe(II) was much more efficiently oxidized from gutter reactors that contained iron mound sediment than ones without any sediment. Close to 100% of the dissolved influent Fe(II) was oxidized in 5–10 h and 75% of the total dissolved Fe was removed. In addition, the reactors performed better as the sediment aged, so that shorter residence times of 1–2 h were also capable of oxidizing substantial amounts of the influent Fe(II). The addition of surface area to the on-mound reactors improved Fe(II) oxidation at residence times of 30 min or less. The results of this study can be used to help design and build treatment systems for low-pH acid mine drainage (AMD) discharges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyer J, Sarnoski B (1995) 1995 Progress report—statement of mutual intent strategic plan for the restoration and protection of streams and watersheds polluted by acid mine drainage from abandoned coal mines. Philadelphia, PA, US EPA, Appendix, http://www.epa.gov/reg3giss/libraryp.htm

  • Brady KBC, Kania T, Smith WM, Hornberger RJ (1998) Coal mine drainage prediction and pollution prevention in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, Ch 4, accessed 18 Jan 2010, http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/minres/districts/cmdp/main.htm

  • Cravotta CA, Trahan MK (1999) Limestone drains to increase pH and remove dissolved metals from acidic mine drainage. Appl Geochem 14:581–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravotta CA, Brady KBC, Rose AW, Douds JB (1999) Frequency distribution of the pH of coal-mine drainage in Pennsylvania. US Geological Survey WRI Report 99-4018A, vol 1, pp 313–324

  • DeSa TC (2009) Promoting low-pH biological iron(II) oxidation of acid mine drainage at Hughes borehole: field and laboratory experiments. PhD Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State Univ, University Park, PA, USA, pp 120

  • GAI (2007) Final report: phase I SRB low mine storage and treatment project evaluation. vol 1, GAI Consultants report submitted to PA DEP Bureau of Mine Reclamation (BAMR), obtained Feb 2009 from BAMR

  • Hedin RS, Nairn RW (1992) Designing and sizing passive mine drainage treatment systems. In: Proceedings of 13th annual WV surface mine drainage task force symposium, http://wvmdtaskforce.com/proceedings/1992.cfm. Accessed 18 Jan 2010

  • Jellison KL, Dick RI, Weber-Shirk ML (2000) Enhanced ripening of slow sand filters. J Environ Eng 126:1153–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2003) The microbiology of acidic mine waters. Res Microbiol 154:466–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby CS, Cravotta CA (2005) Net alkalinity and net acidity 1: theoretical considerations. Appl Geochem 20:1920–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby CS, Thomas HM, Southam G, Donald R (1999) Relative contributions of abiotic and biological factors in Fe(II) oxidation in mine drainage. Appl Geochem 14:1101–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas MA (2008) The comparison of two acid mine drainage sites in central Pennsylvania: field site characterizations and batch reactor experiments. PhD Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA, pp 172

  • Luu Y, Ramsay BA, Ramsay JA (2003) Nitrilotriacetate stimulation of anaerobic Fe(III) respiration by mobilization of humic materials in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5255–5262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nengovhela NR, Strydom CA, Maree JP, Greben HA (2004) Chemical and biological oxidation of iron in acid mine water. Mine Water Environ 23:76–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicormat D, Dick WA, Tuovinen OH (2006) Assessment of the microbial community in a constructed wetland that receives acid coal mine drainage. Microbial Ecol 51:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PA DEP (1999) The science of acid mine drainage and passive treatment. Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, Accessed 18 Jan 2010, http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=588922&mode=2

  • Rose AW, Bisko D, Daniel A, Bower MA (2004) An “autopsy” of the failed Tangascootak #1 vertical flow pond. In: Proceedings of national meeting of the American society of mining and reclamation and 25th WV Surface Mine Drainage Task Force, Morgantown, WV, USA, Accessed 14 Feb 2010, http://wvmdtaskforce.com/proceedings/04/Final_Abstracts_2004.pdf, p 113

  • Senko JM, Wanjugi P, Lucas M, Bruns MA, Burgos WD (2008) Characterization of Fe(II) oxidizing bacterial activities and communities at two acidic Appalachian coalmine drainage-impacted sites. ISME J 2:1134–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine—a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal Chem 42:779–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 683–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver KR, Lagnese KM, Hedin RS (2004) Technology and design advances in passive treatment system flushing. In: Proceedings of national meeting of the American society of mining and reclamation and 25th WV surface mine drainage task force, Morgantown, WV, USA, Accessed 14 Feb 2010, http://wvmdtaskforce.com/proceedings/04/Final_Abstracts_2004.pdf, p 142

  • Williamson MA, Kirby CS, Rimstidt JD (2006) Iron dynamics in acid mine drainage. In: Barnhisel RI (ed) 7th International conference acid rock drainage (ICARD), St Louis, MO, USA, pp 2411–2423

  • Zink T, Wolfe A, Curley K (2005) Restoring the wealth of the mountains: cleaning up Appalachia’s abandoned mines. Trout Unlimited, Accessed 18 Jan 2010, http://www.tu.org/atf/cf/%7BED0023C4-EA23-4396-9371-8509DC5B4953%7D/TU%20AMD%20report.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Brent Means from the US Office of Surface Mining, and Pam Milavec and Mark Kleman from the Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection for directing us to the Hughes Borehole. This work was funded by the Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation. J.F. Brown and W.D. Burgos were also provided support from the National Science Foundation under Grant CHE-0431328.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Trinh C. DeSa, Juliana F. Brown & William D. Burgos

Authors
  1. Trinh C. DeSa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juliana F. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William D. Burgos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William D. Burgos.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

PDF 5 kb

PDF 7 kb

PDF 54 kb

PDF 5 kb

PDF 9 kb

DOC 35 kb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeSa, T.C., Brown, J.F. & Burgos, W.D. Laboratory and Field-scale Evaluation of Low-pH Fe(II) Oxidation at Hughes Borehole, Portage, Pennsylvania. Mine Water Environ 29, 239–247 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-010-0105-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-010-0105-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation