Skip to main content
Log in

Limestone Neutralisation of Arsenic-Rich Effluent from a Gold Mine

  • Technical Communication
  • Published:
Mine Water and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 25 April 2008

Abstract

Traditionally acid mine water is neutralised with lime. Limestone is a cheaper alternative for such applications. A case study showed that limestone can be used effectively to replace lime for the neutralization of arsenic rich acid water. The cost of limestone treatment is 45.8% less than that of lime. The acidity can be removed from 33.5 to 0.06 g/L (as CaCO3). The study also showed no significant differences in the TCLP characteristics of the resultant sludge when water is treated with lime or with limestone. Sludge from the limestone treatment process can be disposed of on a non-hazardous landfill site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater treatment. 17th edn, American Public Health Assoc, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dept of Water Affairs & Forestry (1998) Minimum requirements for the handling, classification and disposal of hazardous waste. Waste Management Series, Appendix 8.5: Toxicity characteristic and acid rain leaching procedures, Pretoria, South Africa

  • Du Plessis P, Maree JP (1994) Neutralisation of acid water in the chemical industry with limestone. Wat Sci Tech 29(8):93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Maree JP (1997) Patent, Integrated iron(II) oxidation and limestone neutralisation. Patent numbers: Republic of South Africa (98/5777); Australia (732237), USA (6,419,834), Canada (2,294,058—pending), Europe (98932321.7—pending)

  • Maree JP, du Plessis P (1994) Neutralisation of acid mine water with calcium carbonate. Wat Sci Tech 29(9):285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Maree JP, du Plessis P, van der Walt CJ (1992) Treatment of acidic effluents with limestone instead of lime. Wat Sci Tech 26(1–2):345–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Maree JP, Van Tonder GJ, Millard P, Erasmus C (1996a) Pilot scale neutralisation of underground mine water. Proc, Biennial International Assoc of Water Quality (IAWQ) Conf, Singapore, 23 - 26 June

  • Maree JP, Dafana D, Mbonjani D, Van Tonder GJ, Millard P (1996b) Development of a limestone process to neutralise acid effluents originating from a phosphate fertilizer manufacturer. Proc, Biennial Water Institute of South Africa (WISA) Conf, Vol 1, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 20 - 23 May 1996, pp 1–10

  • Maree JP, Dingemans D, van Tonder GJ, Mtimkulu S (1998) Biological iron(II) oxidation as pre-treatment to limestone neutralisation of acid water. Wat Sci Tech 38(4–5):331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. H. Mathews.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10230-008-0043-7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Beer, M., Mathews, E.H., Krueger, D. et al. Limestone Neutralisation of Arsenic-Rich Effluent from a Gold Mine. Mine Water Environ 27, 46–51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-007-0023-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-007-0023-3

Keywords

Navigation