Abstract
This study investigates Spanish and Chinese students’ performance on both addition problems and proportion problems considering a cross-national perspective. The effect of number structure and nature of quantities was also considered. Nine hundred twenty-five 4th to 8th graders (453 Chinese, 472 Spanish) took a test which is composed of addition and proportion problems in a missing-value format. The findings showed that Chinese students held a different developmental model of the additive and proportional reasoning from Spanish students. Moreover, number structure and nature of quantities had a different impact in each country. These results indicated that students’ additive and proportional reasoning may vary from country to country due to the different cultures and educational environments. Further studies with a larger-scale sample will be needed to confirm such cross-national effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Details of these pairwise comparisons (including percentages and p values) for additive methods were presented in Appendix 1
Details of these pairwise comparisons (including percentages and p values) for proportional methods were presented in Appendix 2
References
Beijing Normal University Press. (2013). Compulsory education curriculum standard experimental textbook mathematics [义务教育课程标准实验教科书 数学]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
Boyer, T. W., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1478.
Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in US and Chinese students’ solving of process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 309–340.
Cai, J. (2004). Why do US and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving?: impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 135–167.
Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: research and practice. ZDM, 39(5–6), 459–473.
DECRETO 108/2014, de 4 de julio, del Consell, por el que establece el currículo y desarrolla la ordenación general de la educación primaria en la Comunitat Valenciana. [2014/6347].
DECRETO 112/2007, de 20 de julio, del Consell, por el que se establece el currículo de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria en la Comunitat Valenciana. [2007/9717].
De Bock, D., Van Dooren, W., Janssens, D., Verschaffel, L. (2007). The illusion of linearity: from analysis to improvement (Vol. 41): Springer Science & Business Media.
Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and ‘quality education’ in China: an overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 241–249.
Ding, D., & Zhou, J. (2014). How difficult the PISA mathematics test is: a third explaination to Shanghai students’ PISA performance according to an investigation in two Beijing elementary schools. Administration in Elementary and Secondary School [中小学管理], (10), 24–27.
Fan, L., Wong, N.-Y., Cai, J., Li, S. (2004). How Chinese learn mathematics: perspectives from insiders (Vol. 1): World Scientific.
Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2012). Características del desarrollo del razonamiento proporcional en la educación primaria y secundaria. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(1), 0129–0142.
Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L. Effect of the number structure and the quantity nature on secondary school students’ proportional reasoning. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education., 2009 (Vol. 3, pp. 25–32): PME
Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Effect of number structure and nature of quantities on secondary school students’ proportional reasoning. Studia Psychologica, 53(1), 69–81.
Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). The development of students’ use of additive and proportional methods along primary and secondary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(3), 421–438.
Harel, G., & Confrey, J. (1994). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics: Luce Irigaray and ‘the Greeks’. New York: SUNY Press.
Hart, K. M., Brown, M. L., Kuchemann, D. E., Kerslake, D., Ruddock, G., & McCartney, M. (1981). Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16. London: John Murray.
Houdé, O. (2007). First insights on “neuropedagogy of reasoning”. Thinking and Reasoning, 13(2), 81–89.
Jeong, Y., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2007). The development of proportional reasoning: effect of continuous versus discrete quantities. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(2), 237–256.
Jiang, C., Hwang, S., & Cai, J. (2014). Chinese and Singaporean sixth-grade students’ strategies for solving problems about speed. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 27–50.
Kaput, J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing value proportional reasoning problems: factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics: Luce Irigaray and ‘the Greeks’. New York: SUNY Press %\ 2016-03-01 14:43:00.
Leung, F. K. (2014). What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 579–605.
Li, X., Jiang, R., Qian, Y. (2014). 5∼8 graders’ overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems. Journal of Mathematics Education [数学教育学报], (06), 73–77.
Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems: a developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701.
Misailidou, C., & Williams, J. (2003). Diagnostic assessment of children’s proportional reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(3), 335–368.
Molnár, G., Greiff, S., & Csapó, B. (2013). Inductive reasoning, domain specific and complex problem solving: relations and development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 35–45.
Muldoon, K., Simms, V., Towse, J., Menzies, V., & Yue, G. (2011). Cross-cultural comparisons of 5-year-olds’ estimating and mathematical ability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 669–681.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M., Foy, P., Olson, J., Preuschoff, C., & Erberber, E. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report (Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College). Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.: ERIC.
Nesher, P. (1988). Multiplicative school word problems: theoretical approaches and empirical findings. Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades, 2, 19–40.
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: what students know and can do: student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1): OECD.
Robitaille, D. F., & Travers, K. J. (1992). International studies of achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics and teaching (pp. 687–709). New York: Macmillan.
Siegler, R. S. (1999). Strategic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 430–435.
Siegler, R. S., & Mu, Y. (2008). Chinese children excel on novel mathematics problems even before elementary school. Psychological Science, 19(8), 759–763.
Spinillo, A. G., & Bryant, P. E. (1999). Proportional reasoning in young children: part-part comparisons about continuous and discontinuous quantity. Mathematical Cognition, 5(2), 181–197.
Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: a review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 181–204.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Evers, M., Verschaffel, L. (2009). Students’ overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems: how numbers may change solutions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 187–211.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., Verschaffel, L. (2008). The linear imperative: an inventory and conceptual analysis of students’ overuse of linearity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 311–342.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Vleugels, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Just answering… or thinking? Contrasting pupils’ solutions and classifications of missing-value word problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(1), 20–35.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557–628). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Wüstenberg, S., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Complex problem solving—more than reasoning? Intelligence, 40(1), 1–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Ronghuan Jiang. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Room 1432, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Haidian District, Beijing, China, 100875, Web site of institution: http://psych.bnu.edu.cn/, Email: jrh_psy@163.com
Current themes of research:
Mathematics learning and cognition. Inhibitory control and mathematics problem solving.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Li, X., Jiang, R., Qian, Y. (2014). 5∼8 graders’ overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems (Article written in Chinese). Journal of Mathematics Education [数学教育学报], 23(06), 73–77.
Xiaodong Li. College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Room B431, Normal College, Shenzhen University, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518060, Web site of institution: http://psso.szu.edu.cn/, Email: lxd_psy@163.com
Current themes of research:
Mathematics thinking and learning. Inhibitory control and problem solving. Cognitive development of mathematics.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Li, X., Jiang, R., Qian, Y. (2014). 5∼8 graders’ overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems (Article written in Chinese). Journal of Mathematics Education [数学教育学报], 23(06), 73–77.
Li, X., Fu, X, Lu, C. (2015). The effect of situation on college students’ word problem solving: Evidence from eye movement (Article written in Chinese). Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition)[苏州大学学报(教育科学版)], 3(01), 96–104.
Li, X., Xu, W., Li, N. (2012). The negative priming effect in Piaget-like tasks in the “Infra-logic” domain (Article written in Chinese). Journal of Psychological Science, 35(2), 358–363.
Li, X. (2005). Academic delay of gratification of middle school students (Article written in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(4), 491–496.
Li, X., Zhang, X., Wo, J. (2002). Differences in solving compare problems: A comparison of mathematically gifted and mathematically disabled third graders of an elementary school (Article written in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 34(4), 400–406.
Ceneida Fernández. Dpto. Innovación y Formación Didáctica, Universidad de Alicante, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690, San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain, Web site of institution: http://www.ua.es/, Email: ceneida.fernandez@ua.es
Current themes of research:
Mathematics education. Teacher training.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Fernández, C.; De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W. (2014). Do students confuse dimensionality and “directionality”? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.07.001
Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., Llinares, S. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of the derivative concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, DOI: 10.1007/s10763-014-9544-y
Fernández, C.; Llinares, S.; Van Dooren, W.; De Bock, D. & Verschaffel, L. (2012). The development of students’ use of additive and proportional methods along primary and secondary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 421–438
Fernandez, C. & Llinares, S. (2011). De la estructura aditiva a la multiplicativa: efecto de dos variables en el desarrollo del razonamiento proporcional. INFANCIA & APRENDIZAJE, 34(1), 67–80.
Fernández, C.; Llinares, S.; Van Dooren, W.; De Bock, D., Verschaffel (2011). Effect on number structure and nature of quantities on secondary school students’ proportional reasoning. STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 53(1), 69–81
Xinchen Fu. College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, No. 3688 Nanhai Ave., Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518060, Web site of institution: http://psso.szu.edu.cn/, Email: fxc_psy@163.com
Current themes of research:
Mathematics cognition. Inhibitory control and mathematics bias.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Li, X., Fu, X, Lu, C. (2015). The effect of situation on college students’ word problem solving: Evidence from eye movement (Article written in Chinese). Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition)[苏州大学学报(教育科学版)], 3(01), 96–104.
Ronghuan Jiang and Xiaodong Li contributed equally to this work.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, R., Li, X., Fernández, C. et al. Students’ performance on missing-value word problems: a cross-national developmental study. Eur J Psychol Educ 32, 551–570 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0322-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0322-9