Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers' situation-specific mastery experiences: teacher, student group and lesson effects

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following a model on the cyclical nature of teacher (“trait”) self-efficacy and context-, task- and situation-specific (“state”) mastery experiences (TSSME), we investigated the variability and effects of lesson characteristics (e.g. lesson sequence), student group characteristics (e.g. proportion of students receiving free school meals) and teacher characteristics (e.g. teacher experience) on teachers' situation-specific mastery experience. Forty-three teachers reported on 1,055 lessons in 385 student groups using electronic questionnaires in Personal Digital Assistants during a period of 2 weeks. Two domains of TSSME (support of learning and organisation of classrooms) and perception of students (engagement and behaviour) were found. Multilevel models found roughly a quarter of the variance in TSSME between teachers, a quarter between student groups and half between lessons. Student group characteristics differentially predicted TSSME. Perceived student engagement was more predictive of TSSME than perceived student behaviour. More experienced and high-efficacy teachers had higher TSSME. The findings have implications for our understanding of teachers' everyday practice with different student groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the literature on control beliefs (Skinner 1996) and action–control beliefs (Little 1998) parallel concepts have been used. Skinner (1996) distinguished between “agent-means beliefs” as the distinct means (e.g. skills, resources, competences) termed agency, capacity and efficacy expectations, while the “means-ends link” refers to whether a certain mean gives rise to a certain outcome termed, e.g. mean-ends, strategy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Actions of agentic persons are considered volitional, goal-oriented and self-regulatory, and they believe they have the capacity, skills, resources and abilities to realise goals (Little 1998).

  2. In these parallel research fields, researchers have conceptualised the emotional, organisational and cognitive domains of teaching using slightly different terminology: autonomy support, structure and teacher involvement (Skinner and Belmont 1993); emotional support, classroom organisation and instructional support (La Paro et al. 2004); personal learning support, classroom management and cognitively challenging elements (Kunter and Baumert 2006); and learner-centred teaching style, orderly classroom management and content-centred teaching style (Opdenakker and Van Damme 2006).

  3. We calculated the explained variance as the proportion of total level-specific error variance (Hox 2002), for example: \( {R}_{\mathrm{level}2}^2=\left(\frac{\sigma_{e\Big|b}^2-{\sigma}_{e\Big|m}^2}{\sigma_{e\Big|b}^2}\right) \), where σ 2 e|b   is the lowest level residual variance for the baseline model and σ 2 e|m   that for the comparison model, giving \( {R}_{\mathrm{level}2}^2=\left(\frac{0.124-0.066}{0.124}=0.468\right) \).

  4. Effect sizes were calculated using recommendations by Marsh et al. (2009): ES = (2 × B × SDpredictor)/ψ, where B is the unstandardised regression coefficient in the MLM, SDpredictor is the standard deviation of the predictor variable at level 2 and ψ the total variance of the dependent variable.

References

  • Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Reese, L., & Adams, N. E. (1982). Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., & Weiss, K. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(4), 440–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhof, J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). Variance component testing in multilevel models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher–pupil interaction: differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers' job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 821–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. L., Weiss, H. M., & Templin, T. J. (2010). Ecological momentary assessment: a research method for studying the daily lives of teachers. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing-data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellinger, A. B., Bobbett, J. J., Olivier, D. F., & Ellett, C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers' self-efficacy beliefs: development and use of the TEBS-self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2011). Teaching standards. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/teachers%20standards.pdf

  • Department for School, Children and Families [DSCF]. (2009). Deprivation and Education: The evidence on pupils in England, Foundation Stage to Key Stage 4. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/189623/DCSF-RTP-09-01.pdf.pdf

  • Department for Education and Skills [DfES]. (2002). Qualifying to teach: professional standards for qualified teacher status and requirements for initial teacher training. London: Teacher Training Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., & Götz, T. (2007). Emotionales erleben von lehrkräften beim unterrichten [Teachers' emotional experiences during teaching]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21(3–4), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: a developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriele, A. J., & Joram, E. (2007). Teachers' reflections on their reform-based teaching in mathematics: implications for the development of teacher self-efficacy. Action in Teacher Education, 29(3), 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes towards the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(4), 451–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: a construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C. D., & Tamashiro, R. T. (1982). A comparison of first year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving. Psychology in Schools, 19(4), 558–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. (2012). Who is eligible for free school meals? Characterising free school meals as a measure of disadvantage in England. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1003–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., Justice, L. M., Sawyer, B., & Tompkins, V. (2011). Exploring factors related to preschool teachers' self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 961–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: a study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2010). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Linking TIMSS to research on learning and instruction: a re-analysis of the German TIMSS and TIMSS video data. In S. J. Howie & T. Plomp (Eds.), Learning mathematics and science: lessons learned from TIMSS (pp. 335–351). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Paro, K., Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS): findings from the pre-K year. The Elementary School Journal, 104(5), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (1998). Sociocultural influences on the development of children's action-control beliefs. In J. Heckhausen & C. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 281–315). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, L.-E., & Hagger, H. (2009). Changes in student teachers' agency beliefs during a teacher education year, and relationships with observed classroom quality, and day-to-day experiences. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 677–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, L.-E., Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Colls, H. (2010). Observed classroom quality during teacher education and two years of professional practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 916–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, L-E., Woolgar, C., Martin, A. (2013). Quality of measurement of the Learning Experience Questionnaire (LEQ) for Personal Digital Assistants (PDA). International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, (in press).

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(6), 764–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, J., Blake, A., Corbin, B., & Gray, P. (2008). Finding an identity and meeting a standard: connecting the conflicting in teacher induction. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Changes in teacher efficacy and students self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musher-Eizenman, D. R., Nesselroade, J. R., & Schmitz, B. (2002). Perceived control and academic performance: a comparison of high- and low-performing children on within-person change patterns. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 540–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pas, E. T., Bradshaw, C. P., & Hershfeldt, P. A. (2012). Teacher- and school-level predictors of teacher efficacy and burnout: identifying potential areas for support. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Ventura, J., Nuechterlein, K. H., & Kim, K. H. (2005). An illustration of multilevel factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(2), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P. (1995). Gender, ethnic and socio-economic differences in attainment and progress:a longitudinal analysis of student achievement over 9 years. British Educational Research Journal, 21, 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P., Nuttall, D., Cuttance, P., & Thomas, S. (1995). Continuity of school effects: a longitudinal analysis of primary and secondary school effects on GCSE performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 12(1), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totterdell, M., Bubb, S., Heilbronn, R., & Jones, C. (2002). Improving induction: research-based best practice for schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Training and Development Agency for Schools [TDA]. (2009). National framework for the masters in teaching and learning. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. M., Porter, T., Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., Ivery, P. D., Mack, C. E., & Jackson, E. S. (2007). Promoting teacher efficacy for working with culturally diverse students. Preventing school failure. Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 50(1), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, P., Perrez, M., & Pawlik, K. (2012). Conducting research in daily life. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 62–86). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching & Teacher Education, 6(2), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers' sense of efficacy: their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(10), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars-Erik Malmberg.

Additional information

Lars-Erik Malmberg. Docent, Dr. is a university lecturer in quantitative methods in education at the Department of Education, University of Oxford 15, Norham Gardens, OX2 6PY, UK phone: +00-44-(0)1865-274047 Email: lars-erik.malmberg@education.ox.ac.uk

Current themes of research:

His current research interests are intraperson approaches in educational research, students' action control and self-regulation, and teacher development. His five most important publications in educational psychology are:

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

Malmberg, L-E., Hall, J., Martin, A. J., (2013). Academic buoyancy in secondary school: exploring patterns of convergence in mathematics, science, english and physical education. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 262–266.

Malmberg L-E., Mwaura, P., & Sylva, K. (2011). Effects of a pre-school intervention on cognitive development among East-African pre-school children: a flexibly time-coded growth model. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 124–133.

Malmberg, L-E., Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Colls, H. (2010). Observed classroom quality during teacher education and two years of professional practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 916–932.

Malmberg, L-E., & Hagger, H. (2009). Changes in student teachers' agency beliefs during a teacher education year, and relationships with observed classroom quality, and day-to-day experiences. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 677–694.

Malmberg, L-E., Wanner, B., & Little, T. D. (2008). Age and school-type differences in children's beliefs about school performance. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 531–541.

Hazel Hagger. DPhil, Senior Researcher, Department of Education, University of Oxford 15, Norham Gardens, OX2 6PY, UK Email: hazel.hagger@education.ox.ac.uk

Current themes of research:

Hazel is a senior research at the Department of Education, University of Oxford, and a visiting scholar at the Univeristy of Auckland, New Zeeland. Her current research interests are on beginning teachers' own learning. She has published widely in teacher education.

Sophie Webster. (BSc) Assistant Clinical Psychologist/Research Assistant with Psychological Services, Oxford Health, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX4 1XE Email: sophie.webster@oxfordhealth.nhs.uk

Current themes of research:

Sophie was the research assistant in the Teaching Every Lesson (TEL) study in 2009. She is currently working on the CBT for Carers of Dementia research project and is collecting the data for the Psychological Service Evaluation (National Audit of Psychological Therapies). Since graduating she has also been working as an Assistant Team Therapist for the Complex Needs Service and helping with the Personality Disorder projects there.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malmberg, LE., Hagger, H. & Webster, S. Teachers' situation-specific mastery experiences: teacher, student group and lesson effects. Eur J Psychol Educ 29, 429–451 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0206-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0206-1

Keywords

Navigation