Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dialog with black box: using Information Theory to study animal language behaviour

  • Review
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this review, three main experimental approaches for studying animal language behaviour are compared: (1) direct decoding of animals’ communication, (2) the use of intermediary languages to communicate with animals and (3) application of ideas and methods of the Information Theory for studying quantitative characteristics of animal communication. Each of the three methodological approaches has its specific power and specific limitations. Deciphering animals’ signals reveals a complex picture of natural communication in its evolutionary perspective but only fragmentary because of many methodological barriers, among which low repeatability of standard living situations seems to be a bottleneck. Language-training experiments are of great help for discovering potentials of animal language behaviour but leaves characteristics of their natural communications unclear. The use of the methods of Information Theory is based on measuring the time duration that animals spend on transmitting messages of definite information content and complexity. This approach, although does not reveal the nature of animals’ signals, provides a new dimension for studying important characteristics of natural communication systems, which have not been available before. First of all, this approach enables explorers of animals’ language behaviour to obtain knowledge just about the ability of subjects for transferring meaningful messages. Besides, the important properties of animal communication and intelligence can be evaluated such as the rate of information transmission, the complexity of transferred information and potential flexibility of communication systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Morel L (1984) Les activités antennaires au cours des contacts trophallactiques ches la Fourmi Camponotus vagus Scop. Ont-elles valeur de signal? Insectes Soc 31:113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugnyar T, Kijne M, Kotrschal K (2001) Food calling in ravens: are yells referential signals? Anim Behav 61:949–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Camazine S, Visscher PK, Finley J, Vetter R (1999) House-hunting by honey bee swarms: collective decisions and individual behaviors. Insectes Soc 46:348–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1997) Why animals don’t have language. The Tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Devigne C, Detrain C (2006) How does food distance influences foraging in the ant Lasius niger L.: the importance of home-range marking. Insectes Soc 53:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Chittka L (1999) Evolutionary origins of bee dances. Nature 401:38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer FC (1991) Bees acquire route-based memories but not cognitive maps in a familiar landscape. Anim Behav 41:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans WE, Bastian J (1969) Marine mammal communication social and ecological factors. In: Andersen HT (ed) The Biology of marine mammals. Academic, New York, pp 425–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans CS, Marler P (1991) On the use of video images as social stimuli in birds: audience effects on alarm calling. Anim Behav 41:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouts RS (1997) Next of kin, my conversations with chimpanzees. William Morrow, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouts RS, Hirsch AD, Fouts DH (1982) Cultural transmission of a human language in a chimpanzee mother-infant relationship. In: Fitzgerald HE, Mullins JA, Page P (eds) Psychobiological perspectives: child nurturance. vol 3. Plenum, New York, pp 159–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Richardson T (2006) Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature 439:153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RA, Gardner BT (1969) Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science 165:664–672

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RA, Gardner BT (1980) Comparative psychology and language acquisition. In: Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok JTA (eds) Speaking of apes: a critical anthology of two-way communication with man. Plenum, New York, pp 287–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RA, Gardner BT (1998) The structure of learning. Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner RL (1892) The speech of monkeys. C. L. Webster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL (1976) The dance language controversy. Q Rev Biol 57:211–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL, Gould CG (1988) The honey bee. Scientific American Library, W. H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S (1975) Dialects in Japanese monkeys: vocal learning and cultural transmission of locale-specific behavior? Z Tierpsychol 38:304–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1985) Liquid food transmission and antennation signals in ponerine ants. Isr J Entomol 19:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap, Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane J, Spurway H (1954) A statistical analysis of communication in Apis mellifera and a comparison with communication in other animals. Insectes Soc 1:247–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD (2000) A Primate dictionary? Decoding the function and meaning of another species’ vocalizations. Cogn Sci 24:445–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD (2001) What’s so special about speech. In: Dupoux E (ed) Language, brain and cognitive development: essays in honor of Jacques Mehler. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Marler P (1992) How do and should studies of animal communication affect interpretations of child phonological development? In: Ferguson C, Menn L, Stoel-Gammon C (eds) Phonological development. York, Maryland, pp 663–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–1579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1999) The mind of the raven. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM (1980) Cognitive characteristics of dolphins. In: Herman LM (ed) Cetacean behavior: mechanisms and functions. Interscience, New York, pp 363–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM (1990) Cognitive performance of dolphins in visually guided tasks. In: Thomas A, Kastelein RA (eds) Sensory abilities of cetaceans: laboratory and field evidence. Plenum, New York, pp 455–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM, Forestell PH (1985) Reporting presence or absence of named objects by a language-trained dolphin. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:667–691

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM, Richards DG, Woltz JP (1984) Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins. Cognition 16:129–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM, Abichandani SL, Elhajj AN, Herman EYK, Sanchez JL, Pack AA (1999) Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referential character of the human pointing gesture. J Comp Psychol 113:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling R, Brown RL (2000) Analysis of acoustic communication by ants. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1920–1929

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hockett CD (1963) The problem of universals in language. In: Greenberg JH (ed) Universals of language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolf DA (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollén LI, Manser MB (2006) Ontogeny of alarm call responses in meerkats (Suricata suricatta): the roles of age, sex and nearby conspecifics. Anim Behav 72:1345–1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Janik VM (2000) Food-related bray calls in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Proc R Soc 267:923–927

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner W, Towne W (1994) The sensory basis of the honeybee’s dance language. Sci Am 270:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov AN (1965) Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Probl Inf Transm 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Land BB, Seeley TD (2004) The grooming invitation dance of the honey bee. Ethology 110:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawick-Goodall J (1968) The behaviour of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve. Anim Behav Monogr 1:61–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton J, Fourcassié V (2004) Information transfer during recruitment in the ant Lasius niger L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:242–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A, Jaisson P (1982) Evolution et role des communications anntennaires chez les insects sociaux. In: Jaisson P (ed) Social insects in the tropics. Presses de l’Université Paris XIII, Paris, pp 157–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis LA, Schneider SS (2000) The modulation of worker behavior by the vibration signal during house hunting in swarms of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:154–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer M (1961) Communication among social bees. Harvard University Press, Camb

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K (1952) King Solomon’s ring. Crowell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB (2001) The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proc R Soc 268:2315–2324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markov VI, Ostrovskaya VM (1990) Organization of communication system in Tursiops truncatus Montagu. In: Thomas J, Kastelein R (eds) Sensory abilities of cetaceans. Plenum, New York pp 599–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P, Tenaza R (1977) Signaling behavior of apes with special reference to vocalization. In: Sebeok T (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington pp 965–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel EW (1973a) Chimpanzee spatial memory organization. Science 182:943–945

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel EW (1973b) Leadership and communication in young chimpanzees. In: Menzel EW (ed) Precultural primate behavior. S. Karger, Basel, pp 192–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Greggers U, Smith A, Berger S, Brandt R, Brunke S, Bundrock G, Hülse S, Plümpe T, Schaupp F, Schüttler E, Stach S, Stindt J, Stollhoff N, Watzl S (2005) Honey bees navigate according to a map-like spatial memory. Proc Nat Acad Sci 102:3040–3045

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A (1993) The transfer of information in the dance language of honeybees: progress and problems. J Comp Physiol 173:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A (1999) The dance language of honeybees: recent findings and problems. In: Hauser MD, Konishi M (eds) The design of animal communication. MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp 111–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A, Andersen BB, Kirchner W, Lindauer M (1990) Transfer of information during honeybee dances, studied by means of a mechanical model. In: Gribakin F, Wiese K, Popov AV (eds) Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 284–300

  • Miles HL (1993) Language and the orangutan: The old «person» of the forest. In: Cavalieri P, Singer P (eds) The great ape project: equality beyond humanity. Fourth Estate, London, pp 42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Novgorodova TA (2006) Experimental investigation of information transmission in Formica pratensis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) using “the binary tree” maze. Entomol Rev 86:287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson FG (1978) The gestures of a gorilla: language acquisition in another pongid. Brain Lang 5:72–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson FG, Linden E (1981) The education of Koko. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1981) Functional vocalizations by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Z Tierpsychol 55:139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1983) Cognition in the African grey parrot: preliminary evidence for auditory vocal comprehension of the class concept. Anim Learn Behav 11:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1999) The Alex studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack D (1971) Language in chimpanzee? Science 172:808–822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reznikova Z (1982) Interspecific communication among ants. Behaviour 80:84–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznikova Z (2001) Interspecific and intraspecific social learning in ants. IEC, Advances in Ethology 36. Blackwell Sciences, p 108

  • Reznikova ZI (2005) Different forms of social learning in ants. In: St. Andrew international conference on animal social learning. University of St. Andrews, p 17

  • Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (1986) Investigations of ant language by methods of Information Theory. Probl Inf Theory 21:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (1990) Information Theory approach to communication in ants. In: Gribakin FG, Wiese K, Popov AV (eds) Sensory systems and communication in arthropods. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 305–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (1994) Experimental study of the ants communication system with the application of the Information Theory approach. Mem Zool 48:219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (2003) In the shadow of the binary tree: of ants and bits. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International workshop of the mathematics and algorithms of social insects. In: Anderson C, Balch T (eds). Georgian Institute of Technology, Atlanta, pp 139–145

  • Robbins RL (2000) Vocal communication in free-ranging African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Behaviour 137:1271–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM (1977) Language learning by a chimpanzee. The Lana project. Academic Press, New York

  • Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES (1994) Language in comparative perspective. In: Mackintosh NJ (ed) Animal learning and cognition. Academic, New York, pp 307–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryabko B (1993) Methods of analysis of animal communication systems based on the Information Theory. In: Wiese K, Gribakin FG, Popov AV, Renninger G (eds) Sensory systems of arthropods. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 627–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryabko B, Reznikova Z (1996) Using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov Complexity to study the communicative system and cognitive capacities in ants. Complexity 1:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Lewin R (1994) Kanzi: the ape at the brink of the human mind. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Shanker SG, Taylor TJ (1998) Apes, language and the human mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schusterman RJ, Krieger K (1986) Artificial language comprehension and size transposition by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). J Comp Psychol 100:348–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schusterman RJ, Reichmuth Kastak C, Kastak D (2002) The cognitive sea lion: meaning and memory in the lab and in nature. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt G (eds) The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive: The social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Kühnholz S, Seeley RH (2002) An early chapter in behavioral physiology and sociobiology: the science of Martin Linaduer. J Comp Physiol 188:439–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1990) The assessment by vervet monkeys of their own and another species’ alarm calls. Anim Behav 40:754–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2003) Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Ann Rev Psychol 54:145–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Anim Behav 28:1070–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication, I and II. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423, 623–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater PJB (2003) Fifty years of bird song research: a case study in animal behaviour. Anim Behav 65:957–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff CN, Placer J (2006). Acoustic structures in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. J Acoust Soc Am 119:3153–3260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff CN, Kiriazis J, Fischer C, Creef E (1991) Semantic information distinguishing individual predators in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Anim Behav 42:713–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon CT (1986) Vocal communication. In: Mitchell G, Erwin J (ed) Comparative primate biology, vol. 2A: behaviour, conservation and ecology. Alan R. Liss, pp 495–530

  • Snowdon CT, Brown CH, Peterson MR (eds) (1982) Primate communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker T (1967) Behavior of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner DA, Visscher PK (2005) Do honey bees tune error in their dances in nectar-foraging and house-hunting? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:571–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz J, Casas J, Sandeman D (2001) Phase reversal of vibratory signals in honeycomb may assist dancing honeybees to attract their audience. J Exp Biol 204:3737–3746

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS (1979) Nim: a chimpanzee who learned sign language. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Theberge JB, Pimlott DH (1969) Observations of wolves at a rendezvous site in Algonquin Park. Can Field Nat 83:122–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne BL, Traniello JF (2003) Comparative social biology of basal taxa of ants and termites. Annu Rev Entomol 48:283–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanova LI (1950) Shaping notations expressing need for food in Monkeys (in Russian). In: Protopopov VP (ed) Studying of high nervous activity by means of natural experiments. Gosmedizdat, Kiev pp 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Vauclair J (1996) Animal cognition: recent developments in modern comparative psychology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1923) Über die Spräche der Bienen. Zool Jahrb Abt Allg Zool Physiol Tiere 40:1–119

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1947) The dances of the honey bee. Bull Anim Behav 5:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallmann JM (1992) Aping language (themes in the social sciences). Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmann E (1899) Die psychischen Fähigkeiten der Ameisen. Zoologica 26:1–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmüller A, Seeley TD (1999) Imprecision in the waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:190–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaglom AM, Yaglom IM (1976) Challenging mathematical problems with elementary solutions. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes RM (1925) Almost human. The Century, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanin AV, Markov VI, Sidorova IE (1990) The ability of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, to report arbitrary information. In: Thomas J, Kastelein R (eds) Sensory abilities of cetaceans. Plenum, New York, pp 685–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberbühler K (2000) Referential labelling in Diana monkeys. Anim Behav 59:917–927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study was financed by RFBR 05-04-48104. Special thanks to Dr. R. Oliveira for the encouragement in writing this paper and Dr. D. Ryabko for the valuable comments on the manuscript. I thank Dr. Kleber Del Claro and another anonymous referee for constructive comments on a previous version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Animal Systematics and Ecology, Novosibirsk State University, Frunze 11, Novosubirsk, 630091, Russia

    Zhanna Reznikova

Authors
  1. Zhanna Reznikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhanna Reznikova.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Oliveira

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reznikova, Z. Dialog with black box: using Information Theory to study animal language behaviour. acta ethol 10, 1–12 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0026-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0026-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation