Skip to main content
Log in

Red kangaroos (Macropus rufus) receive an antipredator benefit from aggregation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For species that cannot seek cover to escape predators, aggregation becomes an important strategy to reduce predation risk. However, aggregation may not be entirely beneficial because aggregated animals may compete for access to limited resources and might even attract predators. Available evidence suggests that foraging competition influences time allocation in large-bodied macropodid marsupials, but previous studies have focused primarily on species in areas with protective cover. We studied red kangaroos, a species often found in open country without noticeable cover, to determine whether they experienced a net benefit by aggregation. Red kangaroos varied their time allocation as a function of group size and, importantly, more variation in time allocation to vigilance and foraging was explained by non-linear models than by linear models. This suggests red kangaroos directly translated the reduction of predation risk brought about by aggregation into greater time foraging and less time engaged in vigilance. We infer that red kangaroos received a net benefit by aggregation. Social species living in the open may be generally expected to rely on others to help manage predation risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (1998) The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds. Biol Rev 73:449–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (1998) Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends Ecol Evol 13:284–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram BCR (1980) Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Anim Behav 28:278–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT (1998) Quantifying predation risk for refuging animals: a case study with golden marmots. Ethology 104:501–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Daniel JC (2002) Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners. Behav Ecol 13:657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Evans CS, Daniel JC (1999) An experimental study of behavioural group size effects in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii). Anim Behav 58:351–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Evans CS, Daniel JC (2000) JWatcher 0.9. An introductory user's guide. http://galliform.psy.mq.edu.au/jwatcher/ and http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu

  • Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Evans CS (2001a) Yellow-footed rock-wallaby (Petrogale xanthopus) group size effects reflect a trade-off. Ethology 107:655–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, McLean IG (2001b) Group size effects in quokkas. Aust J Zool 49:641–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Ardron JG, Evans CS (2002) Does feeding competition influence tammar wallaby time allocation? Ethology 108:937–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Martindale S, Pulliam HR (1980) Avian time budgets and distance to cover. Auk 97:872–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall CP, Elgar MA, Kikkawa J (1992) Vigilance does not covary with group size in an island population of silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Behav Ecol 3:207–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Popul Biol 30:45–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Colagross AML, Cockburn A (1993) Vigilance and grouping in the eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus. Aust J Zool 41:325–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson G (1996) Anti-predator behaviour in marsupials. In: Croft DB, Gansloßer U (eds) Comparison of marsupial and placental behaviour. Filander, Fürth, Germany, pp 158–186

  • Coulson G (1999) Monospecific and heterospecific grouping and feeding behavior in grey kangaroos and red-necked wallabies. J Mamm 80:270–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TJ (1995) Kangaroos: the biology of the largest marsupial. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney

  • Dill LM (1990) Distance-to-cover and the escape decisions of an African cichlid fish, Melanochromis chipokae. Environ Biol Fish 27:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grand TC, Dill LM (1999) The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Anim Behav 58:443–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WJ III, Watt KEF (1970) Refuging. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:263–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard DC (1992) The effect of wolf predation and snow cover on musk-ox group size. Am Nat 139:190–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1987) Group size and activity in eastern grey kangaroos. Anim Behav 35:1044–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ, Coulson G (1989) Dynamics and adaptiveness of grouping in macropods. In: Grigg G, Jarman P, Hume I (eds) Kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos, vol 2. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, New South Wales, pp 527–547

  • Kenward RE (1978) Hawks and doves: factors affecting success and selection in goshawk attacks on woodpigeons. J Anim Ecol 47:449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP (1984) Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities. Ecology 65:689–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus J (1979) The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive quelea. Anim Behav 27:855–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Zollner PA, Bednekoff PA (1999) Predation, scramble competition, and the vigilance group size effect in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low BS (1979) The predictability of rain and the foraging patterns of the red kangaroo (Megaleia rufa) in central Australia. J Arid Environ 2:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome A (1995) Red kangaroo. In: Strahan R (ed) The mammals of Australia. Reed Books, Chatswood, New South Wales, pp 353–355

  • Payne AL, Jarman PJ (1999) Macropod studies at Wallaby Creek X. Responses of eastern grey kangaroos to cattle. Wildl Res 26:215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pople AR, Grigg GC, Cairns SC, Beard LA, Alexander P (2000) Trends in the numbers of red kangaroos and emus on either side of the South Australian dingo fence: evidence for predator regulation? Wildl Res 27:269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell GVN (1974) Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim Behav 22:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1973) On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol 38:419–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quenette P-Y (1990) Functions of vigilance behaviour in mammals: a review. Acta Oecol 11:801–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe PB, Van Horne B (1998) Influence of habitat on behavior of Townsend's ground squirrels (Spermophilus townsendii). J Mamm 79:906–918

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. (2000) SPSS-10 for the Macintosh. SPSS Inc., Chicago

  • Suhonen J (1993) Predation risk influences the use of foraging sites by tits. Ecology 74:1197–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine I (1971) Risk of visual detection and pursuit by a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour. J Theor Biol 30:405–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahungu GM, Catterall CP, Olsen MF (2001) Predator avoidance, feeding and habitat use in the red-necked pademelon, Thylogale thetis, at rainforest edges. Aust J Zool 49:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank David Croft and the staff at Fowlers Gap for making our stay both productive and enjoyable. Support for this project came from grants to DTB from the University of California Los Angeles, and from the Australian Cooperative Grants Programme (via The Marsupial CRC). Research protocols were approved by the Macquarie University Animal Care Committee (#99018) and research complied with current Australian law.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel T. Blumstein.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Kotrschal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blumstein, D.T., Daniel, J.C. Red kangaroos (Macropus rufus) receive an antipredator benefit from aggregation. acta ethol 5, 95–99 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-002-0070-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-002-0070-5

Keywords

Navigation