Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accessibility, usability, and security evaluation of universities’ prospective student web pages: a comparative study of Europe, North America, and Oceania

  • Communication
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universities' prospective student web pages aim to disseminate information about their academic and social opportunities to their stakeholders; therefore, they must be accessible, of high quality of use and reliable. This article presents the accessibility, usage performance, and security analysis of prospective student web pages of 330 universities from three continents, namely Europe, North America, and Oceania. For this purpose, university websites were selected based on the Webometrics ranking, and online automated test tools were used. The results showed that websites at universities in North America paid more attention to accessibility and quality of use on prospective student web pages, followed by Oceanian and European websites. Evaluated websites had low compliance levels according to the WCAG 2.0 guideline. No major problems were identified in terms of usability and security, but there were certain points for improvement. Moreover, we present and discuss recommendations to developers and administrators for websites to resolve accessibility, usability, and security breaches and provide information equally to all stakeholders. Hence, this analysis report provides feedback to web developers to improve accessibility, quality of use, and security issues of university websites and their prospective student web pages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Almahamid, S.M., Tweiqat, A.F., Almanaseer, M.S.: University website quality characteristics and success: lecturers’ perspective. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 41–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2016.075717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moogan, Y.J.: Can a higher education institution’s marketing strategy improve the student-institution match? Int. J. Educ. Manag. 25(6), 570–589 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111159068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schimmel, K., Motley, D., Marco, G., Eschenfelder, M.: The importance of university web pages in selecting a higher education institution. Res. High. Educ. J. 9(1), 1–16 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ford, W.G.: Evaluating the effectiveness of college web sites for prospective students. J. Coll. Admiss. 212(2001), 26–31 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tsao, W.C., Hsieh, M.T., Lin, T.M.Y.: Intensifying online loyalty! the power of website quality and the perceived value of consumer/seller relationship. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116(9), 1987–2010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Web site accessibility and quality in use: a comparative study of government Web sites in Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 16(4), 987–996 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0490-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Acosta-Vargas, P., Lujan-Mora, S., and Salvador-Ullauri, L.: “Evaluation of the web accessibility of higher-education websites,” 2016 15th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Based High. Educ. Training, ITHET 2016, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2016.7760703.

  8. Máñez-Carvajal, C., Cervera-Mérida, J.F., Fernández-Piqueras, R.: Web accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university Web sites in Spain, Chile and Mexico. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 20(1), 179–184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00702-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verkijika, S.F., De Wet, L.: Accessibility of South African university websites. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 19(1), 201–210 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0632-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 17(2), 437–445 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0541-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurt, S.: Accessibility of Turkish university Web sites. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 16(2), 505–515 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0468-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ismailova, R., Kimsanova, G.: Universities of the Kyrgyz Republic on the Web: accessibility and usability. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0481-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Llinás, G., Mira, J.J., Lorenzo, S., Aibar, C.: A comparison of websites from Spanish, American and British Hospitals. Methods Inf. Med. 47, 124–130 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3414/ME0474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shadpour, P., Teimourpour, B., Asadi, R.: Webometrics-based analysis and ranking of Iranian hospital websites. Int. J. Hosp. Res. 2(2), 77–84 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaur, A., Dani, D., Agrawal, G.: “Evaluating the accessibility, usability and security of Hospitals websites: an exploratory study.” 7th Int Conf. Cloud Comput. Data Sci. Eng. 6, 674–680 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bilal, M., Yu, Z., Song, S., and Wang, C.: “Evaluate Accessibility and Usability Issues of Particular China and Pakistan Government Websites,” 2019 2nd Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Big Data, ICAIBD 2019, pp. 316–322, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD.2019.8836990.

  17. Ismailova, R.: Web site accessibility, usability and security: a survey of government web sites in Kyrgyz Republic. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 16(1), 257–264 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0446-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed, M., Yan, Z., Islam, S., Sunny, M.M.H.: Accessibility analysis of Bangladesh government websites based on WCAG 2.0. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 9(3), 157–167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karaim, N.A., Inal, Y.: Usability and accessibility evaluation of Libyan government websites. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 18(1), 207–216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0575-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Csontos, B., Heckl, I.: Accessibility, usability, and security evaluation of Hungarian government websites. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00716-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yi, Y.J.: Web accessibility of healthcare Web sites of Korean government and public agencies: a user test for persons with visual impairment. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 19, 41–56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0625-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinha A.: “Web accessibility analysis on government of India websites based on WCAG,” IEMTRONICS 2020 - Int. IOT, Electron. Mechatronics Conf. Proc., no. March, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216445.

  23. Formunyuy Verkijika, S., De Wet, L.: A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 39, 20–29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alsmadi, I., Al-Taani, A. T., and Zaid, N. A., “Web structural metrics evaluation,” Proc. - 3rd Int. Conf. Dev. eSystems Eng. DeSE 2010, pp. 225–230, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/DeSE.2010.43.

  25. Rowland, C.: “Accessibility of the Internet in postsecondary education: Meeting the challenge,” Univers. Web Access. Symp., vol. 31, 2000.

  26. Harper, K.A., Dewaters, J.: A Quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions. Internet High. Educ. 11, 160–164 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nielsen, J.: Designing web usability. New Riders (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ismailova, R., Kimsanova, G.: Universities of the Kyrgyz Republic on the Web: accessibility and usability. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 16(4), 1017–1025 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0481-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Campoverde-Molina, M., Luján-Mora, S., Valverde, L.: Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. “Introduction to Web Accessibility | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) | W3C.” https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/ (accessed Apr. 03, 2021).

  31. “WCAG 2 Documents | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) | W3C.” https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/docs/ (accessed Apr. 03, 2021).

  32. Barricelli, B.R., Casiraghi, E., Dattolo, A., Rizzi, A.: 15 years of stanca act: are italian public universities websites accessible? Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 20(1), 185–200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00711-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eggert, E., and Abou-Zahra, S.: “Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools List,” Developed by the Education and Outreach Working Group, 2016. https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/ (accessed Apr. 26, 2021).

  34. Abou-Zahra, S., Steenhout, N., and Keen, L.: “Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools,” Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). 2017, Accessed: Apr. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/tools/selecting/.

  35. Kesswani, N., Kumar, S.: Accessibility analysis of websites of educational institutions. Perspect. Sci. 8, 210–212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. “IDI Web Accessibility Checker : Web Accessibility Checker.” https://achecker.ca/checker/index.php (accessed Apr. 03, 2021).

  37. Tashtoush, Y., Darabseh, A., and Al-Sarhan, H.: “The Arabian E-Government Websites Accessibility: A Case study,” 7th Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Syst., pp. 276–281, 2016.

  38. “TAW | Web accessibility and W3C standardization services.” https://www.tawdis.net/?lang=en (accessed Jun. 19, 2021).

  39. “WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool.” https://wave.webaim.org/ (accessed Apr. 03, 2021).

  40. “Website Error Checker: Accessibility & Link Checker - SortSite.” https://www.powermapper.com/products/sortsite/ (accessed Apr. 03, 2021).

  41. Akgül, Y.: Banking websites in Turkey: an accessibility, usability and security evaluation. J. Bus. Res. - Turk 10(1), 782–796 (2018). https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2018.396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. ISO/IEC, “Ergonomic requirements for ofce work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—part 11 guidance on usability 2018: ISO/IEC 9241–11,” 2018.

  43. McCloskey, D.W.: “The importance of ease of use, usefulness, and trust to online consumers: an examination of the technology acceptance model with older consumers”,. End User Comput. Challenges Technol. Emerg. Tools Appl. 65, 259–276 (2007). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-295-4.ch015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Venkatesh, V., Agarwal, R.: Turning visitors into customers: A usability-centric perspective on purchase behavior in electronic channels. Manage. Sci. 52(3), 367–382 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Youngblood, N.E., MacKiewicz, J.: A usability analysis of municipal government website home pages in Alabama. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 582–588 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaur, S., Kaur, K., Kaur, P.: An empirical performance evaluation of universities website. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 146(15), 10–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016910922

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Zarish, S.S., Habib, S., Islam, M.: “Analyzing usability of educational websites using automated tools.” 2019 Int Conf. Comput. Inf. Sci. ICCIS 2019, 2019–2022 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCISci.2019.8716462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jun, T.W., Xiang, L.Z., Ismail, N.A., Goy, W., Yi, R.: Usability evaluation of social media websites. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci. 03(01), 216–221 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ratnasingam, P.: The importance of technology trust in Web services security. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 10(5), 255–260 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220210447514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dukes, L., Yuan, X., and Akowuah, F.: “A Case Study on Web Application Security Testing with Tools and Manual Testing,” pp. 4–9, 2013.

  51. Alarifi, A., Alsaleh, M., and Al-Salman, A. M.: “Security analysis of top visited Arabic Web sites,” Int. Conf. Adv. Commun. Technol. ICACT, no. ii, pp. 173–178, 2013.

  52. Aguillo, I.F., Ortega, J.L., Fernández, M.: Webometric ranking of world universities: Introduction, methodology, and future developments. High. Educ. Eur. 33(2–3), 233–244 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802254031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Peker, S., Kucukozer-Cavdar, S., Cagiltay, K.: Exploring the relationship between web presence and web usability for universities: a case study from Turkey. Progr. Electron. Libr. Inf. Syst. 50(2), 157–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-04-2014-0024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Manzoor, M., Hussain, W., Ahmed, A., Iqbal, M.J.: The importance of Higher Education Website and its Usability. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 1(2), 150–163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v1i2.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Acosta-Vargas, P., Acosta, T., Lujan-Mora, S.: Challenges to assess accessibility in higher education websites: a comparative study of Latin america universities. IEEE Access 6, 36500–36508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Alahmadi, T., Drew, S.: “Accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university websites in world, oceania, and arab categories for home, admission, and course description webpages. J. Open Flex. Distance Learn. 21(1), 7–24 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Işeri, E.I., Uyar, K., Ilhan, Ü.: The accessibility of Cyprus Islands’ higher education institution websites. Procedia Comput. Sci. 120, 967–974 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ringlaben, R., Bray, M., Packard, A.: Accessibility of American university special education departments’ web sites. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 13(2), 249–254 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0302-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Laufer Nir, H., Rimmerman, A.: “Evaluation of Web content accessibility in an Israeli institution of higher education Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 17(3), 663–673 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0615-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. S. Kaur, K. Kaur, and P. Kaur, “Analysis of website usability evaluation methods,” Proc. 10th INDIACom; 2016 3rd Int. Conf. Comput. Sustain. Glob. Dev. INDIACom 2016, no. December, pp. 1043–1046, 2016.

  61. Yerlikaya, Z., Durdu, P.O.: Evaluation of accessibility of university websites: a case from turkey. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 714, 663–668 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58753-0_94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Akgül, Y.: Accessibility, usability, quality performance, and readability evaluation of university websites of Turkey: a comparative study of state and private universities. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 20(1), 157–170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00715-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kurt, S.: The accessibility of university web sites: The case of Turkish universities. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 10(1), 101–110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-010-0190-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. “Ranking Web of Universities: Webometrics ranks 30000 institutions | Rankings updated every January and July: Universities, Webometrics, Bibliometrics, Altmetrics.” http://www.webometrics.info/en (accessed Mar. 24, 2021).

  65. Pădure, M., and Pribeanu, C.: “Exploring the differences between five accessibility evaluation tools,” 2019.

  66. Akgül, Y., Vatansever, K.: Web accessibility evaluation of government websites for people with disabilities in Turkey. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 4(3), 201–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.4.3.201-210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ismail, A., and Kuppusamy, K. S.: “Web accessibility investigation and identification of major issues of higher education websites with statistical measures: A case study of college websites,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., no. xxxx, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.03.011.

  68. “GTmetrix | Website Performance Testing and Monitoring.” https://gtmetrix.com/ (accessed Jun. 19, 2021).

  69. “Sucuri - Complete Website Security, Protection & Monitoring.” https://sucuri.net/ (accessed Jun. 19, 2021).

  70. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K.S., Paiva, S.: Accessibility analysis of higher education institution websites of Portugal. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 19(3), 685–700 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00653-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Ankara, Turkey

    Şevval Seray Macakoğlu

  2. Department of Management Information Systems, İzmir Bakircay University, İzmir, Turkey

    Serhat Peker

  3. Department of Management Information Systems, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey

    İhsan Tolga Medeni

Authors
  1. Şevval Seray Macakoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Serhat Peker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. İhsan Tolga Medeni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Şevval Seray Macakoğlu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macakoğlu, Ş.S., Peker, S. & Medeni, İ.T. Accessibility, usability, and security evaluation of universities’ prospective student web pages: a comparative study of Europe, North America, and Oceania. Univ Access Inf Soc 22, 671–683 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00869-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00869-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation