Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of web accessibility in China: changes from 2009 to 2013

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the status of web accessibility in China and to reveal any improvements during the period 2009 to 2013. Two evaluation studies were carried out in 2009 and 2013, respectively. Thirty-eight popular Chinese websites were evaluated in 2009 and fifty in 2013 with reference to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG). The studies applied the conformance evaluation method with the help of the automatic evaluation tool Hera. The evaluation results indicated that none of the surveyed websites passed all the checkpoints of Priority 1 in both studies, which means no website met the minimum requirement for web accessibility. The average level of web accessibility worsened between 2009 and 2013 due to the increase of website complexity and the amount of content. However, e-government websites had made some significant improvement during these 4 years, which indicated that the government had realized the web accessibility issues and made some effort to address them. The evaluation also revealed five major accessibility barriers existing in both studies, and these barriers also served as technical suggestions for web content providers. The web accessibility of Chinese websites is far from satisfactory, and it is getting worse from 2009 to 2013. However, e-government websites had improved significantly in regards to accessibility due to the release of accessibility regulations. Thus, the reason that explains low web accessibility in China is the lack of awareness rather than lack of technical skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ceaparu, I., Shneiderman, B. Improving web-based civic information access: a case study of the 50 US States. In: (ISTAS’02). 2002 International Symposium on Technology and Society, 2002. IEEE, pp. 275–282 (2002)

  2. Stowers, G., The state of federal websites: The pursuit of excellence. E-government (2002)

  3. Loiacono, E.T.: Cyberaccess: web accessibility and corporate America. Commun. ACM 47(12), 82–87 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mills, J.E., Han, J.-H., Clay, J.M.: Accessibility of hospitality and tourism websites a challenge for visually impaired persons. Cornell Hosp. Quart. 49(1), 28–41 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sloan, D., Gregor, P., Booth, P., Gibson, L.: Auditing accessibility of UK higher education web sites. Interact. Comput. 14(4), 313–325 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi, Y.: The accessibility of Queensland visitor information centres’ websites. Tour. Manag. 27(5), 829–841 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong, S., Katerattanakul, P., Joo, S.J.: Evaluating government website accessibility: a comparative study. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 7(03), 491–515 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sullivan, T., Matson, R., Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web’s most popular sites. In: Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability. ACM, pp. 139–144 (2000)

  9. Lazar, J., Beere, P., Greenidge, K.-D., Nagappa, Y.: Web accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United states: a study of 50 homepages. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2(4), 331–341 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Loiacono, E.T., McCoy, S.: Website accessibility: a cross-sector comparison. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(4), 393–399 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B., Zeng, X.: A retrospective look at website accessibility over time. Behav. Inf. Technol. 24(6), 407–417 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazar, J., Greenidge, K.-D.: One year older, but not necessarily wiser: an evaluation of homepage accessibility problems over time. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(4), 285–291 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazar, J., Wentz, B., Almalhem, A., Catinella, A., Antonescu, C., Aynbinder, Y., Bands, M., Bastress, E., Chan, B., Chelden, B., Feustel, D., Gautam, N., Gregg, W., Heppding, M., Householder, C., Libby, A., Melton, C., Olgren, J., Palestino, L., Ricks, M., Rinebold, S., Seidel, M.: A longitudinal study of state government homepage accessibility in Maryland and the role of web page templates for improving accessibility. Gov. Inform. Quart. 30(3), 289–299 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Curl, A.L., Bowers, D.D.: A longitudinal study of website accessibility: how social work education websites become more accessible? J. Technol. Hum. Serv. 27(2), 93–105 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B.: A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites. Internet Res. 15(3), 281–294 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi, Y.: The accessibility of Chinese local government web sites: an exploratory study. Gov. Inform. Quart. 24(2), 377–403 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, Y.: E-government web site accessibility in Australia and China a longitudinal study. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 24(3), 378–385 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, Z., Chen, H., An accessibility study of Chinese local government websites. In: 2nd International Conference on Networking and Digital Society, Wenzhou, May 30–31 IEEE, pp. 270–273 (2010)

  19. Brajnik, G., Web accessibility testing: When the method is the culprit. In: Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, pp. 156–163 (2006)

  20. Paddison, C., Englefield, P.: Applying heuristics to accessibility inspections. Interact. Comput. 16(3), 507–521 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abou-Zahra, S.: A data model to facilitate the automation of web accessibility evaluations. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 157(2), 3–9 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2005.12.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanderdonckt, J., Beirekdar, A., Noirhomme-Fraiture, M., Automated evaluation of web usability and accessibility by guideline review. In: Web Engineering. Springer, pp. 17–30 (2004)

  23. Bühler, C., Heck, H., Perlick, O., Nietzio, A., Ulltveit-Moe, N., Interpreting results from large scale automatic evaluation of web accessibility. In: Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, pp. 184–191 (2006)

  24. Benavídez, C., Fuertes J.L., Gutiérrez, E., Martínez, L. Semi-automatic evaluation of web accessibility with HERA 2.0. In: Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, pp. 199–206 (2006)

  25. Zhao, W., Massey, B., Murphy, J., Fang, L.: Cultural dimensions of website design and content. Prometheus 21(1), 74–84 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (#71188001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Lianhui Zhou, Na Sun & Runting Zhong

Authors
  1. Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lianhui Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Na Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Runting Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei-Luen Patrick Rau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rau, PL.P., Zhou, L., Sun, N. et al. Evaluation of web accessibility in China: changes from 2009 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc 15, 297–303 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0385-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0385-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation