Abstract
This article defines universal design for learning (UDL) and presents examples of how universally designed technology hardware and software applications benefit students with disabilities who are majoring in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) majors. When digital technologies are developed without incorporating accessible design features, persons with disabilities cannot access required information to interact with the information society. However, when accessible technology and instruction are provided using UDL principles, research indicates that many students benefit with increased achievement. Learning through universally designed and accessible technology is essential for students with disabilities who, without access, would not gain the skills needed to complete their degrees and access employment and a life of self-sufficiency. UDL strategies enhance learning for all students, including students with disabilities who are majoring in STEM, which are among the most rigorous academic disciplines, but also among the most financially rewarding careers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Springett, M., Rice, M., Griffiths, R.: Towards inclusive digital television. Univ Access Inf Soc (2013). doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0261-9
Kochhar-Bryant, C., Bassett, D.S., Webb, K.W.: Transition to Postsecondary Education for Students with Disabilities. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA (2009)
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.M., Shaver, D.: Comparisons Across Time of the Outcomes of Youth with Disabilities up to 4 Years After High School. A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI, Menlo Park, CA (2009)
Sevo, R.: Basics About Disabilities and Science and Engineering Education. Dissertation, Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology (2011)
McGuire, J.M., Scott, S.S.: Universal design for instruction: extending the universal design paradigm to college instruction. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 19, 124–134 (2006)
Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008: Pub L No 110-315, § 102 & §103(a) (24) (2008)
Zeff, R.: Universal design across the curriculum. New Dir. High. Educ. 137, 27–44 (2007)
Rose, D.H., Meyers, A.: A Practical Reader in Universal Design for Learning. Harvard Education Publishing Group, Cambridge, MA (2006)
Suzuki, M., Yamaguchi, K., Gardner, J.: InftyReader—An OCR System for Math Documents. http://www.access2science.com/infty/InftyReader.html (2013). Accessed 15 Mar 2013
Murray, E., Brookover, J.: Universal design for learning in the mathematics classroom. In: Hall, T.E., Meyer, A., Rose, D.H. (eds.) Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom; Practical Applications. Guilford Press, New York (2012)
Rose, D.H., Meyer, A.: Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA (2002)
Izzo, M.V., Murray, A., Novak, J.: Universal design for learning: the faculty perspective. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 21, 60–72 (2008)
Hilton, M.: Skills for work in the 21st century: what does the research tell us? Acad. Manag. Perspect. (AMP). 22(4), 63–78 (2008)
Luecking, R.G., Fabian, E.S.: Paid internship and employment success for youth in transition. Career Dev. Except. Indivd. 23, 205–219 (2000)
Mapou, R.L.: Adult Learning Disabilities and ADHD: Research-Informed Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education, Washington, DC (2009)
Made for iPad. http://www.apple.com/ipad/from-the-app-store/. Accessed 5 Jan 2013
Buckley, K.: Accessibility for iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch: A Blind User’s Review. http://www.nillabyte.com/ (2009)
Liu, A.: Exclusive: iPads on College Campuses? Maybe next year. FoxNews.com. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2010/09/23/ipads-college-campuses/ (2010). Accessed 23 Sep 2010
University of Maryland Honors College Digital Cultures & Creativity. http://www.dcc.umd.edu/. Accessed 5 Jan 2013
Purdue University: Purdue University students develop ‘SPEAKall’ app to help children with severe autism. Global Accessibility News. http://globalaccessibilitynews.com/2012/04/02/purdue-university-students-develop-speakall-app-to-help-children-with-severe-autism/ (2012). Accessed 2 Apr 2012
Graves, L.M., Asunda, P.A., Plant, S., Goad, C.: Asynchronous online access as an accommodation on students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders in postsecondary STEM courses. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 24, 317–330 (2012)
Block, L.S., Loewen, G., Kroeger, S.: Acknowledging and transforming disabling environments in higher education: AHEAD’s role. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 19, 117–123 (2006)
Izzo, M.V., Rissing, S.R., Andersen, C., Nasar, J., Lissner, L.S.: Universal design for learning in the college classroom. In: Preiser, W.G., Smith, K.H., Ostroff, E. (eds.) Universal Design Handbook, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)
Reay, N.W., Li, P., Bao, L.A.: Testing a new voting machine question methodology. Am. J. Phys. 76, 171–178 (2008)
Izzo, M.V., Lamb, P.: Developing self-determination through career development activities: implications for vocational rehabilitation counselors. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 19(2), 71–78 (2003)
Eisenman, L.: Conceptualizing the contribution of career oriented schooling on self-determination. Career Dev. Except. Indivd. 24, 3–17 (2001)
Anderson-Inman, L., Horney, M.: Supported eText: assistive technology through text transformations. Read. Res. Q. 42, 153–160 (2007)
Boone, R., Higgins, K.: The role of instructional design in assistive technology research and development. Read. Res. Q. 42, 135–139 (2007)
Fried-Oken, M.: Assistive technology in communication disorders. In: Paul, R., Cascella, P.W. (eds.) Introduction to Clinical Methods in Communication Disorders, 2nd edn, pp. 303–320. Brookes, Portland, OR (2007)
Forgrave, K.E.: Assistive technology: empowering students with learning disabilities. Assist. Technol. 73, 122–126 (2002)
Izzo, M.V., Yurick, A., McArrell, B.: Supported eText: effects of text-to-speech on access and achievement for high school students with disabilities. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 24(3), 9–20 (2009)
Boone, R.T., Burke, M.D., Fore, C., Spencer, V.G.: The impact of cognitive organizers and technology-based practices on student success in secondary social studies classrooms. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 21(1), 5–15 (2006)
Izzo, M.V., Murray, A., O’Hanlon, N.: Enhancing academic achievement and transition outcomes using technology. Information brief: addressing trends and developments in secondary education and transition, 4(5). National Center on Secondary Education and Transition, Minneapolis (2005)
Wehmeyer, M.L.: Self-determination, vocational rehabilitation, and workplace supports. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 19, 67–69 (2003)
Shogren, K.A., Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S.B., Soukup, J.H., Little, T.D., Garner, N., Lawrence, M.: Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Except. Child. 73, 488–509 (2007)
Hanley-Maxwell, C.D., Collet-Klingenberg, L.: Curricular choices related to work. In: Wehman, P., Kregel, J. (eds.) Functional Curriculum for Elementary, Middle, and Secondary Age Students with Special Needs, 3rd edn. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX (2012)
Hanley-Maxwell, C.D., Izzo, M.V.: Preparing students for the 21st century workforce. In: Wehmeyer, M.L., Webb, K.W. (eds.) Handbook of Transition for Youth with Disabilities. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, New York (2012)
Acknowledgments
The content of this paper was funded in part by NSF Award number HRD-0833561 and US Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education Award number GRT00021456. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not reflect those of the National Science Foundation or US Department of Education. Portions of this article were adapted from a paper entitled “Universal Design for Learning: Enhancing Achievement of Students with Disabilities” presented at DSAI 2012, the 4th International Conference on Software Development for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion and from the following two chapters: (a) Hanley-Maxwell and Izzo [38] and (b) Izzo et al. [24]. The authors wish to thank Vicki Graff and Madison Bauer for their editorial and formatting assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Izzo, M.V., Bauer, W.M. Universal design for learning: enhancing achievement and employment of STEM students with disabilities. Univ Access Inf Soc 14, 17–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0332-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0332-1