Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Universal design for learning: enhancing achievement and employment of STEM students with disabilities

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article defines universal design for learning (UDL) and presents examples of how universally designed technology hardware and software applications benefit students with disabilities who are majoring in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) majors. When digital technologies are developed without incorporating accessible design features, persons with disabilities cannot access required information to interact with the information society. However, when accessible technology and instruction are provided using UDL principles, research indicates that many students benefit with increased achievement. Learning through universally designed and accessible technology is essential for students with disabilities who, without access, would not gain the skills needed to complete their degrees and access employment and a life of self-sufficiency. UDL strategies enhance learning for all students, including students with disabilities who are majoring in STEM, which are among the most rigorous academic disciplines, but also among the most financially rewarding careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Springett, M., Rice, M., Griffiths, R.: Towards inclusive digital television. Univ Access Inf Soc (2013). doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0261-9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kochhar-Bryant, C., Bassett, D.S., Webb, K.W.: Transition to Postsecondary Education for Students with Disabilities. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.M., Shaver, D.: Comparisons Across Time of the Outcomes of Youth with Disabilities up to 4 Years After High School. A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI, Menlo Park, CA (2009)

  4. Sevo, R.: Basics About Disabilities and Science and Engineering Education. Dissertation, Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology (2011)

  5. McGuire, J.M., Scott, S.S.: Universal design for instruction: extending the universal design paradigm to college instruction. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 19, 124–134 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008: Pub L No 110-315, § 102 & §103(a) (24) (2008)

  7. Zeff, R.: Universal design across the curriculum. New Dir. High. Educ. 137, 27–44 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose, D.H., Meyers, A.: A Practical Reader in Universal Design for Learning. Harvard Education Publishing Group, Cambridge, MA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suzuki, M., Yamaguchi, K., Gardner, J.: InftyReader—An OCR System for Math Documents. http://www.access2science.com/infty/InftyReader.html (2013). Accessed 15 Mar 2013

  10. Murray, E., Brookover, J.: Universal design for learning in the mathematics classroom. In: Hall, T.E., Meyer, A., Rose, D.H. (eds.) Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom; Practical Applications. Guilford Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rose, D.H., Meyer, A.: Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Izzo, M.V., Murray, A., Novak, J.: Universal design for learning: the faculty perspective. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 21, 60–72 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hilton, M.: Skills for work in the 21st century: what does the research tell us? Acad. Manag. Perspect. (AMP). 22(4), 63–78 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luecking, R.G., Fabian, E.S.: Paid internship and employment success for youth in transition. Career Dev. Except. Indivd. 23, 205–219 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mapou, R.L.: Adult Learning Disabilities and ADHD: Research-Informed Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education, Washington, DC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Made for iPad. http://www.apple.com/ipad/from-the-app-store/. Accessed 5 Jan 2013

  18. Buckley, K.: Accessibility for iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch: A Blind User’s Review. http://www.nillabyte.com/ (2009)

  19. Liu, A.: Exclusive: iPads on College Campuses? Maybe next year. FoxNews.com. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2010/09/23/ipads-college-campuses/ (2010). Accessed 23 Sep 2010

  20. University of Maryland Honors College Digital Cultures & Creativity. http://www.dcc.umd.edu/. Accessed 5 Jan 2013

  21. Purdue University: Purdue University students develop ‘SPEAKall’ app to help children with severe autism. Global Accessibility News. http://globalaccessibilitynews.com/2012/04/02/purdue-university-students-develop-speakall-app-to-help-children-with-severe-autism/ (2012). Accessed 2 Apr 2012

  22. Graves, L.M., Asunda, P.A., Plant, S., Goad, C.: Asynchronous online access as an accommodation on students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders in postsecondary STEM courses. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 24, 317–330 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Block, L.S., Loewen, G., Kroeger, S.: Acknowledging and transforming disabling environments in higher education: AHEAD’s role. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 19, 117–123 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Izzo, M.V., Rissing, S.R., Andersen, C., Nasar, J., Lissner, L.S.: Universal design for learning in the college classroom. In: Preiser, W.G., Smith, K.H., Ostroff, E. (eds.) Universal Design Handbook, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reay, N.W., Li, P., Bao, L.A.: Testing a new voting machine question methodology. Am. J. Phys. 76, 171–178 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Izzo, M.V., Lamb, P.: Developing self-determination through career development activities: implications for vocational rehabilitation counselors. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 19(2), 71–78 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eisenman, L.: Conceptualizing the contribution of career oriented schooling on self-determination. Career Dev. Except. Indivd. 24, 3–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson-Inman, L., Horney, M.: Supported eText: assistive technology through text transformations. Read. Res. Q. 42, 153–160 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boone, R., Higgins, K.: The role of instructional design in assistive technology research and development. Read. Res. Q. 42, 135–139 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fried-Oken, M.: Assistive technology in communication disorders. In: Paul, R., Cascella, P.W. (eds.) Introduction to Clinical Methods in Communication Disorders, 2nd edn, pp. 303–320. Brookes, Portland, OR (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Forgrave, K.E.: Assistive technology: empowering students with learning disabilities. Assist. Technol. 73, 122–126 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Izzo, M.V., Yurick, A., McArrell, B.: Supported eText: effects of text-to-speech on access and achievement for high school students with disabilities. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 24(3), 9–20 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boone, R.T., Burke, M.D., Fore, C., Spencer, V.G.: The impact of cognitive organizers and technology-based practices on student success in secondary social studies classrooms. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 21(1), 5–15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Izzo, M.V., Murray, A., O’Hanlon, N.: Enhancing academic achievement and transition outcomes using technology. Information brief: addressing trends and developments in secondary education and transition, 4(5). National Center on Secondary Education and Transition, Minneapolis (2005)

  35. Wehmeyer, M.L.: Self-determination, vocational rehabilitation, and workplace supports. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 19, 67–69 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shogren, K.A., Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S.B., Soukup, J.H., Little, T.D., Garner, N., Lawrence, M.: Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Except. Child. 73, 488–509 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hanley-Maxwell, C.D., Collet-Klingenberg, L.: Curricular choices related to work. In: Wehman, P., Kregel, J. (eds.) Functional Curriculum for Elementary, Middle, and Secondary Age Students with Special Needs, 3rd edn. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hanley-Maxwell, C.D., Izzo, M.V.: Preparing students for the 21st century workforce. In: Wehmeyer, M.L., Webb, K.W. (eds.) Handbook of Transition for Youth with Disabilities. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The content of this paper was funded in part by NSF Award number HRD-0833561 and US Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education Award number GRT00021456. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not reflect those of the National Science Foundation or US Department of Education. Portions of this article were adapted from a paper entitled “Universal Design for Learning: Enhancing Achievement of Students with Disabilities” presented at DSAI 2012, the 4th International Conference on Software Development for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion and from the following two chapters: (a) Hanley-Maxwell and Izzo [38] and (b) Izzo et al. [24]. The authors wish to thank Vicki Graff and Madison Bauer for their editorial and formatting assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaretha Vreeburg Izzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Izzo, M.V., Bauer, W.M. Universal design for learning: enhancing achievement and employment of STEM students with disabilities. Univ Access Inf Soc 14, 17–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0332-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0332-1

Keywords

Navigation