Skip to main content
Log in

Accessibility and interoperability in e-government systems: outlining an inclusive development process

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multidisciplinary nature of e-government demands a research agenda that includes issues related to social inclusion, universal accessibility, interoperability, privacy, security, and citizen participation, to name a few. Understanding the underlying cultural context, the involvement of citizens in the proposal and evaluation of services, and the promotion of quality in use are aspects that need special consideration in the development of systems to support government. This paper provides an outline for a process model for promoting the identification and specification of accessible e-government services with the participation of the interested parties. A socially shared perspective is adopted toward the comprehension of the involved problems and the elaboration of potential solutions. The proposed model is a result of practice in the domain, using organizational semiotics artifacts to stimulate participation and discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.dasilva.org.br/.

  2. http://webxact.watchfire.com/.

  3. http://www.cynthiasays.com/.

  4. http://www.usablenet.com/products_services/lift_online/lift_online.html.

  5. http://www.tawdis.net/.

  6. http://intervox.nce.ufrj.br/.

  7. http://www.freedomscientific.com/.

  8. http://www.micropower.com.br/v3/pt/acessibilidade/index.asp.

  9. Norman clarifies this view at: http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/hcd_harmful_a_clari.html.

References

  1. Agile, Alliance: Manifesto for Agile Software development. http://agilemanifesto.org/ (2001). Accessed 08 April 2008

  2. Baranauskas, M.C.C., Bonacin, R.: Design—indicating through signs. Des. Issues, 24(3), 30–45 (2008)

  3. Bergman, E., Johnson, E.: Towards accessible human–computer interaction. In: Nielsen, J. (ed.) Advances in Human–Computer Interaction. Ablex Publishing Corporation, New Jersey (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bevan, N.: Quality in use for all. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonacin, R.: A design model to support co-operation based on participatory design and Organizational Semiotics. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of Campinas, Brazil (in Portuguese) (2004)

  6. Bonacin, R., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Semiotic conference: work signs and participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 22–27 June 2003

  7. Bonacin, R., Simoni, C.A.C., Melo, A.M., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Organizational Semiotics: guiding a service-oriented architecture for e-government. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Organizational Semiotics, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, 507, July 2006

  8. Brazil.: Decree Law no 5.296 of 2, December 2004. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil/_ato2004-2006/2004/Decreto/D5296.htm/ (2004). Accessed February 2008 (in Portuguese)

  9. Brazil.: Electronic Government. In: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. http://www.governoeletronico.gov.br/ (2006). Accessed February 2008 (in Portuguese)

  10. Constantine, L., Biddle, R., Noble, J.: Usage-centered design and software engineering: models for integration. In: IFIP Working Group 2.7/13.4, ICSE 2003 Workshop on Bridging the Gap Between Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction, Portland, Oregon, USA, 3–10, May 2003

  11. David, L., Henderson-Sellers, B.: Characteristics of Web development processes. In: SSGRR-2001 Infrastructure for e-business, e-education, and e-science, Aquila, Italy, 6–12, August 2001

  12. Dawes, S.S., Préfontaine, L.: Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Commun. ACM (2003). doi:10.1145/602421.602444

  13. Dearden, A., Lauener, A., Slack, F., Roast, C., Cassidy, S.: Make it so! Jean-Luc Picard, Bart Simpson and the design of e-public services. In: Proceedings of the 9th Participatory Design Conference, Trento, Italy, 1–5, August 2006

  14. Dias, C.: Web accessibility guidelines and policies. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 7–10, October 2002 (in Portuguese)

  15. e-PING.: Padrões de Interoperabilidade de Governo Eletrônico, v. 2.0. https://www.governoeletronico.gov.br/acoes-e-projetos/e-ping-padroes-de-interoperabilidade (2006). Accessed 27 February 2007 (in Portuguese)

  16. Escalona, M.J., Mejías, M., Torres, J.: Methodologies to develop Web information systems and comparative analysis. In: UPGRADE The European Magazine for the IT Professional, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 25–36 (2002)

  17. Erl, T.: Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. FEA.: Consolidated reference model document. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/documents/CRM.PDF (2005). Accessed 27 February 2007

  19. Gappa, H., Nordbrock, G.: Applying Web accessibility to Internet portals. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 80–87 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gibson, J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Graupp, H., Gladstone, K., Rundle, C.: Accessibility, usability and cognitive considerations in evaluating systems with users who are blind. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed) Universal Access in HCI: Inclusive Design in Information Society, vol. 4, pp. 1335–1339 (2003)

  22. Grönlund, Å.: State of the art in e-Gov research: surveying conference publications. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res, 1(4), 1–25 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grønbæk, K., Kyng, M., Mogensen, P.: Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach. In: Kyng, M., Mathiassen, L. (eds.) Computers and Design in Context. MIT Press, Boston Massachusetts (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henry, S.L.: Just ask: integrating accessibility throughout design. E T Lawton, Houston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hitz, M., Leitner, G., Melcher, R.: Usability of Web applications. In: Kappel, G., et al. (eds.) Web Engineering: The Discipline Of Systematic Development Of Web Applications. Wiley, West Sussex (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holzinger, A.: Usability engineering for software developers. Commun. ACM 48(1), 71–74 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Memmel, T., Reiterer, H., Holzinger, A.: Agile methods and visual specification in software development: a chance to ensure universal access. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Coping with Diversity in Universal Access, Research and Development Methods in Universal Access. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 4554), pp. 453–462. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Kleinberger, T., Seffah, A., Javahery, H.: investigating usability metrics for the design and development of applications for the elderly. In: Miesenberger, K. et al. (eds.) 11th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 5105), 98–105 (2008)

  29. IDABC.: European interoperability framework for pan-European e-government services, v. 1.0. http://europa.eu.int/idabc/en/chapter/5583 (2005). Accessed 27 February 2007

  30. ISO.: ISO 9241-11 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals—part 11, Guide on usability (1998)

  31. Johnston, S.K., Smith J.: RUP Plug-In for SOA V1.0. In: IBM Developer Works. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/05/510_soaplug/ (2006). Accessed February 2006

  32. Kirkpatrick, A., Rutter, R., Heilmann, C., Thatcher, J.: Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance. Friends of ED, Berkeley (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kotonya, G., Hutchinson, J., Bloin, B.: COMPOSE: a method for formulating and architecting service-based systems. In: Stojanovic, Z., Dahanayake, A. (eds.) Service-Oriented Software System Engineering: Challenges and Practices, Idea Group Inc, USA (2004)

  34. Kroll, P.: The spirit of the RUP, the rational edge. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/content/RationalEdge/dec01/TheSpiritoftheRUPDec01.pdf (2001). Accessed 08 April 2008

  35. Kyng, M.: Designing for cooperation: cooperating in design. Commun. ACM (1991). doi:10.1145/125319.125323

  36. Liu, K.: Employing MEASUR methods for business process reengineering in China. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (2001)

  37. Liu, K.: Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, K., Stamper, R.K., Huang, K.: A morphology for re-engineering competitive business. In: Booth, A. (ed) Legacy to Client/Server—Have you chosen wisely. UNICOM Press, Tokyo (1997)

  39. Liu, K., Hu, M.: A semiotic analysis of e-policing strategies in the United Kingdom. In: Huang, W., Siau, K., Wei, K.K. (eds.) Digital Government: Strategies and Implementations in Developed and Developing Countries, pp. 373–393. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Marchionini, G., Samet, H., Brandt, L.: Digital government. Commun. ACM 46(1), 24–27 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Medjahed, B., Rezgui, A., Bouguettaya, A., Ouzzani, M.: Infrastructure for e-government web services. IEEE Intern. Comput. (2003). doi:10.1109/MIC.2003.1167340

  42. Melo, A.M.: Design Inclusivo de sistemas de informação na web. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (2007) (in Portuguese)

  43. Melo, A.M., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: An inclusive approach to cooperative evaluation of the Web user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Paphos, Cyprus, 23–27, May 2006

  44. Melo, A.M., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Design para inclusão: desafios e propostas. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, 19–22, November 2006 (in Portuguese)

  45. Muller, M.J., Haslwanter, J.H., Dayton, T.: Participatory practices in the software life cycle. In: Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P.V. (eds.) Handbook of Human–Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. Elsevier, North-Holland (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Newcomer, E., Lomow, G.: Understanding SOA with Web Services. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Nielsen, J.: The usability engineering life cycle. Computer. (1992). doi:10.1109/2.121503

  49. Norman, D.A., e Draper, S.W. (eds.): User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human–Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Norman, D.A.: Human-centered design considered harmful. Interactions 12, 14–19 (2005). doi:10.1145/1070960.1070976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Oostveen, A.M., Besselaar, P.: From small scale to large scale user participation: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems. In: Proceedings of the eighth Participatory Design Conference, Toronto, Canada, 27–31, July 2006 (2004)

  52. OSW.: The circulation document in the organizational semiotic workshop. In: The 1st International Workshop on Organizational Semiotics, Enschede, The Netherlands (1995)

  53. Pekkola, S., Kaarilahti, N., Pohjola, P.: Towards formalized end user participation in information systems development process: bridging the gap between participatory design and ISD methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 9th Participatory Design Conference, Trento, Italy, 1–5, August 2006

  54. Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1931–1958)

  55. Rocha, H.V., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Design e avaliação de interfaces humano-computador, 2nd edtn, Nied/Unicamp, Campinas, Brazil (in Portuguese). http://www.nied.unicamp.br/download_livro.html (2003). Accessed February 2008

  56. Sampaio, A., Vasconcelos, A., Sampaio, R.F.: Assessing agile methods: an empirical study. J. Brazilian Comput. Soc. 2(10), 22–41 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Savidis, A., Stephanidis, C.: Unified user interface development: the software engineering of universally accessible interactions. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 165–193 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Schimigel, J., Melo, A.M., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Bauzer Medeiros, C.: Accessibility as a quality requirement: geographic information systems on the Web. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Latin American Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 23–26, October 2005

  59. Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.): Participatory design: principles and practices, p. 312. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, USA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Simoni, C.A.C., Bonacin, R., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Bringing social constructs to the information system development process: contributions of Organizational Semiotics. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Miami, EUA, 25–28, May 2005

  61. Simoni, C.A.C., Melo, A.M., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Towards a social-based process for information system development: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Organizational Semiotics. Toulouse, France, 23–24, June 2005

  62. Sprott, D., Wilkes, L.: Understanding service-oriented architecture. In: CBDI Forum. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnmaj/html/aj1soa.asp (2005). Accessed February 2006

  63. Stamper, R.K.: Information in Business and Administrative Systems. Wiley, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Stamper, R.K.: Social Norms in requirements analysis—an outline of MEASUR. In: Jirotka, M., Goguen, J., Bickerton, M. (eds.) Requirements Engineering, Technical and Social Aspects. Academic Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Stamper, R., Liu, K., Hafkamp, M., Ades, Y.: Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organizations—a semiotic approach to information system design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 19(1), 15–27 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Stojanovic, Z., Dahanayake, A.: Service-Oriented Software System Engineering: Challenges and Practices. Idea Group Inc, USA (2004)

  67. USA.: Sect. 508: the road to accessibility. In: Administração de Serviços Gerais dos Estados Unidos da América: http://www.section508.gov/ (2006). Accessed April 2006

  68. Virzi, R.A.: Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum. Factors 34, 457–468 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  69. W3C.: Policies relating to web accessibility initiative”. In: World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/ (2006). Accessed April 2006

  70. W3C.: Web accessibility initiative. In: World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/WAI/ (2007). Accessed February 2006

  71. Wood, F., Siegel, E., LaCroix, E., Lyon, B.: A pratical approach to e-Governement web evaluation. IT Prof. 5(3), 22–28 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Brazilian National Council for Research (CNPq, processes 476381/2004-5 and 140719/2003-2) and FAPESP-MS (2007/54564-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Bonacin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonacin, R., Melo, A.M., Simoni, C.A.C. et al. Accessibility and interoperability in e-government systems: outlining an inclusive development process. Univ Access Inf Soc 9, 17–33 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0157-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0157-0

Keywords

Navigation