Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using a universal access reference model to identify further guidance that belongs in ISO 16071

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ISO TS 16071 Guidance on accessibility for human computer interfaces was developed via the collection and evaluation of an extensive set of existing software accessibility research and guidance. While this approach has served well in creating this first major international software accessibility standard, it is limited in its ability to expand the range of its guidance to areas not covered by existing research. This paper introduces a universal access reference model that can be used to identify areas requiring further accessibility guidance. It also demonstrates the use of this reference model in identifying guidelines that should be considered for potential addition to ISO 16071, as it progresses from a technical specification to an international standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Assistive Technology Industry Association (2002) AT-IT compatibility guidelines version 1.05. http://www.atia.org/AT_Compatibility_Guidelines_v1.05.pdf. Cited 2002

  2. Bergman E, Johnson E (1995) Towards accessible human-computer interaction. In: Nielson J (ed) Advances in human computer interaction, Ablex, Norwood, NJ

  3. Carter J, Fourney D (2003) The Canadian position regarding the evolution of ISO TS 16071 towards becoming an international standard. ISO TC159 / SC4 / WG5 document N0731

  4. Disabled Peoples International (1993) Constitution of disabled peoples international. http://www.dpi.org/en/about_us/constitution.htm. Cited 1993

  5. European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (1999) The current situation concerning potential alleviations to identified barriers. http://www.stakes.fi/cost219/COSB220.html. Cited 1999

  6. Gaines B, Shaw M (1986) A learning model for forecasting the future of information technology. Fut Comp Sys 1(1):31–70

    Google Scholar 

  7. Inclusion of Disabled and Elderly People in Telematics (2000) Basic design for all principles. http://www.stakes.fi/include/pam2.html. Cited 2000

  8. Inclusion of Disabled and Elderly People in Telematics (2000) Factors affecting uptake and use of technology. http://www.stakes.fi/include/incc320.html. Cited 2000

  9. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO 9241–13—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 13: User guidance

  10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 9241–14—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs—Part 14: Menu dialogues

  11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 9241–15—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 15: Command dialogues

  12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1999) ISO 9241–16—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 16: Direct manipulation dialogues

  13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO 9241–17—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 17: Form filling dialogues

  14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2003) ISO 14915–2—Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces—navigation and control (Final Draft International Standard)

  15. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO 14915–3—Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces—media selection and combination, (Final Draft International Standard).

  16. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO TS 16071—Ergonomics of human system interaction—guidance on accessibility for human-computer interfaces

  17. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2001) ISO/IEC Guide 71.2. Draft guidelines to address the needs of older persons and people with disabilities when developing standards

  18. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO/IEC JTC1 N5611 (1998) Elements of reflection on cultural and linguistic adaptability of products and standards in the field of information and communication technologies

  19. Jacko J, Vitense H (2001) A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society 1:56–76

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindgaard G (2002) Emotion, reason and the dichotomies that influence technology. http://www.carleton.ca/hotlab/hottopics/Articles/reasonandemotion.html. Cited 2002

  21. Lynch G, Meads J (1986) In search of a user interface reference model: report on the SIGCHI workshop on user interface reference models. SIGCHI Bulletin 18(2):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maskery H, Meads J (1992) Context: in the eyes of users and in computer systems. SIGCHI Bulletin 24(2):12–21

    Google Scholar 

  23. McDermott R, Varenne (1995) Culture as disability. Anthrop Educ Quart 26(3):324–348

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

  25. Stephanidis C, Savidis, A (2001) Universal access in the information society: methods, tools, and interaction technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society 1:40–55

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taubes G (2000) Transparent computing. http://domino.watson.ibm.com/comm/wwwr_thinkresearch.nsf/pages/coverstory100.html. Cited 2000

  27. United Nations Commission for Social Development on Disability (1993) United Nations standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities (A/RES/48/96). http://www.independentliving.org/standardrules/. Cited 1993

  28. Vanderheiden G (1990) Thirty-something million: should they be exceptions? Hum Fact 32(4):383–396

    Google Scholar 

  29. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2002) XML accessibility guidelines. http://www.w3.org/TR/xag. Cited 2002

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Jim Carter & David Fourney

Authors
  1. Jim Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Fourney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, J., Fourney, D. Using a universal access reference model to identify further guidance that belongs in ISO 16071. Univ Access Inf Soc 3, 17–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0074-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0074-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation