Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare postoperative complications and cost of treatment of laparoscopic (LA) versus open appendectomy (OA) and to identify the most cost-effective treatment method.

Methods

Patients treated for appendectomy in US veterans health administration (VHA) hospitals in 2005 were included into our study. Direct medical cost and postoperative complications during hospitalization were used as outcomes. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for baseline imbalances between treatment groups. It was adjusted for the severity of appendicitis, comorbidities according to Charlson Comorbidity Index, and demographic variables. 1:1 optimal matching with replacement was performed. Based on the matched samples, we estimated generalized linear mixed regression models for costs (gamma model) and postoperative complications (logit model). Besides patients’ covariates, predictors of hospital resource use and quality of care at the hospital level were considered as explanatory variables.

Results

The total study population comprised of 1,128 patients (370 LA, 758 OA) from 95 VHA hospitals. Type of appendectomy had a significant influence on total costs (P = 0.005), with predicted costs for LA being 17.1% lower in comparison to OA (OA: 10,851 US$ [95%CI: 9,707 US$; 12,131 US$] vs. LA: 8,995 US$ [95%CI: 8,073 US$; 10,022 US$]). Differences in the predicted overall postoperative complication were not significant between LA and OA (P = 0.6311). Severity of appendicitis had a significant impact on costs and postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Predicted costs for LA were 1,856 US$ lower than for OA while the postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Thus, LA is the treatment of choice from a provider’s perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sporn, E., Petroski, G.F., Mancini, G.J., Astudillo, J.A., Miedema, B.W., Thaler, K.: Laparoscopic appendectomy—is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 208, 179–185 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reissfelder, C., Mc Cafferty, B., von Frankenberg, M.: Open appendectomy: When do we still need it? Chirurg 80, 602–607 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eriksson, S., Granstrom, L.: Randomised controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br. J. Surg. 82, 166–169 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiarugi, M., Buccianti, P., Celona, G., Decanini, L., Martino, M.C., Goletti, O., Cavina, E.: Laparoscopic compared with open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur. J. Surg. 162, 385–390 (1996)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Semm, K.: Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15, 59–64 (1983)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guller, U., Hervey, S., Purves, H., Muhlbaier, L.H., Peterson, E.P., Eubanks, S., Pietrobon, R.: Lapraoscopic versus open appendectomy—outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann. Surg. 239, 43–52 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kehagias, I., Karamanakos, S.N., Panagiotopoulos, S., Panagopoulos, K., Kalfarentzos, F.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J. Gastroenterol. 14, 4909–4914 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Long, K.H., Bannon, M.P., Zietlow, S.P., Helgeson, E.R., Harmsen, W.S., Smith, C.D.: A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129, 390–400 (2001)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maxwell, J.G., Tyler, B.A., Rutledge, R., Brinker, C.C., Maxwell, B.G., Covington, D.L.: Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from a comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am. J. Surg. 182, 687–692 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fingerhut, A., Millat, B., Borrie, F.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J. Surg. 23, 835–845 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garbutt, J.M., Soper, N.J., Shannon, W.D., Botero, A., Littenberg, B.: Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 9, 17–26 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei, B., Qi, C.L., Chen, T.F., Zheng, Z.H., Huang, J.L., Hu, B.G., Wei, H.B.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg. Endosc. 4, 1–10 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauerland, S., Lefering, R., Holthausen, U., Neugebauer, E.A.M.: Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 383, 289–295 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, H.S., Lai, H.W., Kuo, S.J., Lee, Y.T., Chen, D.R., Chi, C.W., Huang, M.H.: Competitive edge of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: a subgroup comparison analysis. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 21, 197–202 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiwari, M.M., Reynoso, J.F., High, R., Tsang, A.W., Oleynikov, D.: Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg. Endosc. 25, 1–9 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heikkinen, T., Haukipuro, K., Hulkko, A.: Cost-effective appendectomy. Surg. Endosc. 12, 1204–1208 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bresciani, C., Perez, R.O., Habr-Gama, A., Jacob, C.E., Ozaki, A., Batagello, C., Proscurshim, I., Gama-Rodrigues, J.: Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 9, 1174–1180 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ignacio, R.C., Burke, R., Spencer, D., Bissell, C., Dorsaonvil, C., Lucha, P.A.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg. Endosc. 18, 334–337 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lintula, H., Kokki, H., Vanamo, K., Valtonen, H., Mattila, M., Eskelinen, M.: The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 158, 34–37 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yaisawarng, S., Burgess Jr, J.F.: Performance-based budgeting in the public sector: an illustration from the VA health care system. Health Econ. 15, 295–310 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schreyoegg, J., Stargardt, T.: The trade-off between costs and outcomes: the case of acute myocardial infarction. Health Serv. Res. 45, 1585–1601 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carey, K., Burgess, J.F.: Hospital costing: experience from the VHA. Financ. Account. Manag. 16, 289–308 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schreyoegg, J., Stargardt, T., Tiemann, O.: Costs and quality of hospitals in different health care systems: a multi-level approach with propensity score matching. Health Econ. 20, 85–100 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hale, D., Molloy, M., Pearl, R., Schutt, D., Jaques, D.: Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann. Surg. 225, 252–261 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kazemier, G., Bijness, A.B., Schilthuis, M.S., Kazemier, G., Bijness, A.B., Schilthuis, M.S.: Appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease. In: Van Lanschot, J., Gouma, D., Jansen, P., Jones, E.A., Pinedo, H.M., Schouten, W.R., Tytgat, G. (eds.) Integrated medical and surgical gastroenterology, pp. 338–345. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Deyo, R.A., Cherkin, D.C., Ciol, M.A.: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 45, 613–619 (1992)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, B., Evans, D., Faris, P., Dean, S., Quan, H.: Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases. BMC Health Serv. Res. 8, 12 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Quan, H., Sundararajan, V., Halfon, P., Andrew Fong, B., Burnand, B., Luthi, J., Saunders, L., Beck, C., Feasby, T., Ghali, W.: Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med. Care 43, 1130–1139 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sundararajan, V., Henderson, T., Perry, C., Muggivan, A., Quan, H., Ghali, W.: New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 57, 1288–1294 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schreyoegg, J.: A micro-costing approach to estimating hospital costs for appendectomy in a Cross-European context. Health Econ. 17, 59–69 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schrag, D., Cramer, L., Bach, P., Cohen, A., Warren, J., Begg, C.: Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 284, 3028–3035 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Flood, A., Scott, W., Ewy, W.: Does practice make perfect? Part II: the relation between volume and outcomes and other hospital characteristics. Med. Care 22, 115–125 (1984)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. D’Agostino, R.B.: Tutorial in biostatistics: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat. Med. 17, 2265–2281 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Indurkhya, A., Mitra, N., Schrag, D.: Using propensity scores to estimate the cost-effectiveness of medical therapies. Stat. Med. 25, 1561–1576 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rubin, D.: The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 29, 185–203 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Greenland, S.: Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am. J. Public Health 79, 340–349 (1989)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Normand, S.L.T., Landrum, M.B., Guadagnoli, E., Ayanian, J.Z., Ryan, T.J., Cleary, P.D., McNeil, B.J.: Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 54, 387–398 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Snijders, T., Bosker, R.: Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Grieve, R., Nixon, R., Thompson, S.G., Cairns, J.: Multilevel models for estimating incremental net benefits in multinational studies. Health Econ. 16, 815–826 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hauck, K., Street, A.: Performance assessment in the context of multiple objectives: a multivariate multilevel analysis. J. Health Econ 25, 1029–1048 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goldstein, H.: Multilevel models. In: Armitrage, P., Colton, C. (eds.) Encyclopedia of biostatistics, pp. 2725–2731. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Diehr, P.: Methods for analyzing health care utilization and costs. Annu. Rev. Public Health 20, 125–144 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Piskun, G., Kozik, D., Rajpal, S., Shaftan, G., Fogler, R.: Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg. Endosc. 15, 660–662 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yagmurlu, A., Vernon, A., Barnhart, D., Georgeson, K., Harmon, C.: Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. Surg. Endosc. 20, 1051–1054 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Severens, J.L., De Boo, T.M., Konst, E.M.: Uncertainty of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 15, 608–614 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Henderson, J.: Health economics & policy. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Garber, A.M., Phelps, C.E.: Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. J. Health Econ. 16, 1–31 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cothren, C.C., Moore, E.E., Johnson, J.L., Moore, J.B., Ciesla, D.J., Burch, J.M.: Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am. J. Surg. 190, 950–954 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Martin, L., Puente, I., Sosa, J., Bassin, A., Breslaw, R., McKenney, M., Ginzburg, E., Sleeman, D.: Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann. Surg. 222, 256–262 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nakhamiyayev, V., Galldin, L., Chiarello, M., Lumba, A., Gorecki, P.: Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred approach for appendicitis: a retrospective review of two practice patterns. Surg. Endosc. 24:859–864 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Botha, A., Elton, C., Moore, E., Sauven, P.: Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a trainee’s perspective. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 77, 259–262 (1995)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Macario, A., Vitez, T.S., Dunn, B., McDonald, T.: Where are the costs in perioperative care? Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology 83, 1138–1144 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yeh, C.C., Wu, S.C., Liao, C.C., Su, L.T., Hsieh, C.H., Li, T.C.: Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study. Surg. Endosc. 25:2932–2942 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Katkhouda, N., Mason, R.J., Towfigh, S., Gevorgyan, A., Essani, R.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann. Surg. 242, 439–448 (2005)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Canty Sr., T.G., Collins, D., Losasso, B., Lynch, F., Brown, C.: Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice? J. Pediatr. Surg. 35, 1582–1585 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ball, C.G., Kortbeek, J.B., Kirkpatrick, A.W., Mitchell, P.: Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg. Endosc. 18, 969–973 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hoehne, F., Ozaeta, M., Sherman, B., Miani, P., Taylor, E.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: is the postoperative infectious complication rate different? Am. Surg. 71, 813–815 (2005)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Scarborough, J.E., Pietrobon, R., Tuttle-Newhall, J.E., Marroquin, C.E., Collins, B.H., Desai, D.M., Kuo, P.C., Pappas, T.N.: Relationship between provider volume and outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12, 1527–1533 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dimick, J.B., Birkmeyer, J.D., Upchurch, G.R.: Measuring surgical quality: what’s the role of provider volume? World J. Surg. 29, 1217–1221 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gordon, T.A., Bowman, H.M., Bass, E.B., Lillemoe, K.D., Yeo, C.J., Heitmiller, R.F., Choti, M.A., Burleyson, G.P., Hsieh, G., Cameron, J.L.: Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 189, 46–56 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hughes, R.G., Hunt, S.S., Luft, H.S.: Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals. Med. Care 25, 489–503 (1987)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lin, Y.Y., Shabbir, A., So, J.B.Y.: Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve. Surg. Endosc. 24, 125–130 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ali, A., Moser, M.A.J.: Recent experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in a Canadian teaching centre. Can. J. Surg. 51, 51–55 (2008)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 41–55 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Observational studies. Springer, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Smith, J., Todd, P.: Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? J. Econometrics 125, 305–353 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ho, D.E., Imai, K., King, G., Stuart, E.A.: Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit. Anal. 15, 199–236 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Byford, S., Raftery, J.: Perspectives in economic evaluation. Br. Med. J. 316, 1529–1530 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg/Munich, Germany

    Laura Haas, Tom Stargardt & Jonas Schreyoegg

  2. Department for Health Services Management, Munich University, Munich, Germany

    Tom Stargardt & Jonas Schreyoegg

  3. Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Jonas Schreyoegg

Authors
  1. Laura Haas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tom Stargardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonas Schreyoegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Haas.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Results from logistic regression to estimate the propensity score
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haas, L., Stargardt, T. & Schreyoegg, J. Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching. Eur J Health Econ 13, 549–560 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0355-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0355-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation