Abstract
Objective
To investigate the association of antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia with cost of primary and secondary health service use.
Method
Comparative analysis of health service cost for patients prescribed antipsychotic polypharmacy versus antipsychotic monotherapy. Resource utilisation and costs were described using central Danish registers for a 2 year period (2007–2008). We included patients attached to one of two Danish psychiatric referral centres in 1 January 2008 and/or 1 January 2009. Their prescribed treatment with either antipsychotic polypharmacy or monotherapy at the two cross-sectional dates was recorded and used as proxy of polypharmacy exposure during the preceding year. A multivariate generalised linear model was fitted with total costs of primary and secondary health service use as dependent variable, and antipsychotic polypharmacy, diagnosis, age, gender, disease duration, psychiatric inpatient admissions, and treatment site as covariates.
Results
The sample consisted of 736 outpatients with a diagnosis in the schizophrenia spectrum. Antipsychotic polypharmacy was associated with significantly higher total health service costs compared with monotherapy (2007: 25% higher costs; 2008: 17% higher costs) when adjusting for potential confounders and risk factors. A subgroup analysis suggested that the excessive costs associated with antipsychotic polypharmacy were partly accounted for by the functional level of the patients.
Conclusion
The results demonstrate that antipsychotic co-prescribing is associated with increased use of health care services, even though no causal relations can be inferred from an observational study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mangalore, R., Knapp, M.: Cost of schizophrenia in England. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 10(1), 23–41 (2007)
Stargardt, T., Weinbrenner, S., Busse, R., et al.: Effectiveness and cost of atypical versus typical antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia in routine care. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 11(2), 89–97 (2008)
Canales, P.L., Olsen, J., Miller, A.L., et al.: Role of antipsychotic polypharmacotherapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. CNS Drugs 12(3), 179–188 (1999)
Botts, S., Hines, H., Littrell, R.: Antipsychotic polypharmacy in the ambulatory care setting, 1993–2000. Psychiatr. Serv. 54(8), 1086 (2003)
Broekema, W.J., de Groot, I.W., Van Harten, P.N.: Simultaneous prescribing of atypical antipsychotics, conventional antipsychotics and anticholinergics-a European study. Pharm. World Sci. 29(3), 126–130 (2007)
Clark, R.E., Bartels, S.J., Mellman, T.A., et al.: Recent trends in antipsychotic combination therapy of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: implications for state mental health policy. Schizophr. Bull. 28(1), 75–84 (2002)
Harrington, M., Lelliott, P., Paton, C., et al.: The results of a multi-centre audit of the prescribing of antipsychotic drugs for in-patients in the UK. Psychiatr. Bull. 26, 414–418 (2002)
McCue, R.E., Waheed, R., Urcuyo, L.: Polypharmacy in patients with schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychiatry 64(9), 984–989 (2003)
Centorrino, F., Goren, J.L., Hennen, J., et al.: Multiple versus single antipsychotic agents for hospitalized psychiatric patients: case-control study of risks versus benefits. Am. J. Psychiatry 161(4), 700–706 (2004)
Kingsbury, S.J., Yi, D., Simpson, G.M.: Psychopharmacology: rational and irrational polypharmacy. Psychiatr. Serv. 52(8), 1033–1036 (2001)
Miller, A.L., Craig, C.S.: Combination antipsychotics: pros, cons, and questions. Schizophr. Bull. 28(1), 105–109 (2002)
Barbui, C., Signoretti, A., Mule, S., et al.: Does the addition of a second antipsychotic drug improve clozapine treatment? Schizophr. Bull. 35(2), 458–468 (2009)
Freudenreich, O., Goff, D.C.: Antipsychotic combination therapy in schizophrenia. A review of efficacy and risks of current combinations. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 106(5), 323–330 (2002)
Lerner, V., Libov, I., Kotler, M., et al.: Combination of “atypical” antipsychotic medication in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 28(1), 89–98 (2004)
Mouaffak, F., Tranulis, C., Gourevitch, R., et al.: Augmentation strategies of clozapine with antipsychotics in the treatment of ultraresistant schizophrenia. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 29(1), 28–33 (2006)
Pandurangi, A.K., Dalkilic, A.: Polypharmacy with second-generation antipsychotics: a review of evidence. J Psychiatr Pract 14(6), 345–367 (2008)
Stahl, S.M., Grady, M.M.: A critical review of atypical antipsychotic utilization: comparing monotherapy with polypharmacy and augmentation. Curr. Med. Chem. 11(3), 313–327 (2004)
Tranulis, C., Skalli, L., Lalonde, P., et al.: Benefits and risks of antipsychotic polypharmacy: an evidence-based review of the literature. Drug Saf 31(1), 7–20 (2008)
Correll, C.U., Rummel-Kluge, C., Corves, C., et al.: Antipsychotic combinations vs monotherapy in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophr. Bull. 35, 443–457 (2009)
Paton, C., Whittington, C., Barnes, T.R.: Augmentation with a second antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia who partially respond to clozapine: a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 27(2), 198–204 (2007)
Taylor, D.M., Smith, L.: Augmentation of clozapine with a second antipsychotic—a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 119(6), 419–425 (2009)
Stahl, S.M., Grady, M.M.: High-cost use of second-generation antipsychotics under California’s Medicaid program. Psychiatr. Serv. 57(1), 127–129 (2006)
Zhu, B., Ascher-Svanum, H., Faries, D.E., et al.: Cost of antipsychotic polypharmacy in the treatment of schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 8, 19 (2008)
Knapp, M., Mangalore, R., Simon, J.: The global costs of schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 30(2), 279–293 (2004)
Tediosi, F., Parazzini, F., Garattini, L.: Cost of schizophrenia studies: a methodological review. Hepac 1, 14–19 (2000)
Andersen, T.F., Madsen, M., Jørgensen, J., et al.: The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan. Med. Bull. 46(3), 263–268 (1999)
Munk-Jorgensen, P., Mortensen, P.B.: The Danish Psychiatric Central Register. Dan. Med. Bull. 44(1), 82–84 (1997)
Olivarius, N.F., Hollnagel, H., Krasnik, A., et al.: The Danish National Health Service Register. A tool for primary health care research. Dan. Med. Bull. 44(4), 449–453 (1997)
Barber, J., Thompson, S.: Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 9(4), 197–204 (2004)
Loosbrock, D.L., Zhao, Z., Johnstone, B.M., et al.: Antipsychotic medication use patterns and associated costs of care for individuals with schizophrenia. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 6(2), 67–75 (2003)
Biancosino, B., Barbui, C., Marmai, L., et al.: Determinants of antipsychotic polypharmacy in psychiatric inpatients: a prospective study. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20(6), 305–309 (2005)
Ito, H., Koyama, A., Higuchi, T.: Polypharmacy and excessive dosing: psychiatrists’ perceptions of antipsychotic drug prescription. Br. J. Psychiatry 187, 243–247 (2005)
Koyama, A., Ito, H., Nakanishi, M., et al.: Addition of antipsychotics to medication regimens during schizophrenic inpatient care. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 62(1), 56–64 (2008)
Muijen, M., Silverstone, T.: A comparative hospital survey of psychotropic drug prescribing. Br. J. Psychiatry 150, 501–504 (1987)
Sim, K., Su, A., Chan, Y.H., et al.: Clinical correlates of antipsychotic polytherapy in patients with schizophrenia in Singapore. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 58(3), 324–329 (2004)
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the National Board of Health in Denmark (0-204-02-9/9) as part of the funding for a health technology assessment, and the Wørzner Foundation.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baandrup, L., Sørensen, J., Lublin, H. et al. Association of antipsychotic polypharmacy with health service cost: a register-based cost analysis. Eur J Health Econ 13, 355–363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0308-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0308-0