Abstract
Objectives
Choices between formal and informal care for disabled elderly people living at home are a key component of the long-term care provision issues faced by an ageing population. This paper aims to identify factors associated with the type of care (informal, formal, mixed or no care at all) received by the French disabled elderly and to assess the care’s relative costs.
Methods
This paper uses data from a French survey on disability; the 3,500 respondents of interest lived at home, were aged 60 and over, had severe disability and needed help with activities of daily living. We use a multinomial probit model to determine factors associated with type of care. We also assess the cost of care with the help of the proxy good method.
Results
One-third of disabled elderly people receive no care. Among those who are helped, 55% receive informal, 25% formal, and 20% mixed care. Low socioeconomic status increases difficulties in accessing formal care. The estimated economic value of informal care is 6.6 billion euro [95% CI = 5.9–7.2] and represents about two-thirds of the total cost of care.
Conclusion
Public policies should pay more attention to inequalities in access to community care. They also should better support informal care, through respite care or workplace accommodations (working hours rescheduling or reduction for instance) not detrimental for the career of working caregivers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to this methodology, a person needing help with bathing requires 4 care hours per week; with dressing: 4.67 h; with using the toilet: 7 h; with eating: 14 h; with getting in and out of bed: 4.67 h; with shopping: 3.25 h; with preparing meals: 7 h; with doing housework: 13 h; with going out: 3.5 h [38].
References
Costa-Font, J., Rovira-Forns, J.: Who is willing to pay for long-term care insurance in Catalonia? Health Policy 86, 72–84 (2008)
Karlsson, M., Mayhew, L., Plumb, R., Rickayzen, B.: Future costs for long-term care: cost projections for long-term care for older people in the United Kingdom. Health Policy 75, 187–213 (2006)
Joël, M.E., Dufour-Kippelen, S.: Financing systems of care for older persons in Europe. Aging Clin Exp Res 14, 293–299 (2002)
Hoerger, T., Picone, G., Sloan, F.: Public subsidies, private provision of care and living arrangements of the elderly. Rev Econ Stat 78, 428–440 (1996)
Karlsson, M., Mayhew, L., Rickayzen, B.: Long-term care financing in four OECD countries: fiscal burden and distributive effects. Health Policy 80, 107–134 (2007)
Rice, D.P.: Health and long-term care for the aged. Am. Econ. Rev. 79, 343–348 (1989)
OECD: Long-term care for older people. OECD, Paris (2005)
Bell, D., Bowes, A., Heitmueller, A.: Did the introduction of free personal care in Scotland result in a reduction of informal care? The WDA-HSG Discussion Paper Series on Demographic Issues. 2007/3 (2007)
Brouwer, W.B.: Too important to ignore: informal caregivers and other significant others. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 39–41 (2006)
Arber, S., Attias-Donfut, C.: The Myth of Generational Conflict: the Family and State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London (2000)
Bolin, K., Lindgren, B., Lundborg, P.: Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe. Health Econ. 17, 393–409 (2008)
Brouwer, W., van Exel, N.J., Koopmanschap, M., Rutten, F.F.: The valuation of informal care in economic appraisal. A consideration of individual choice and societal costs of time. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 15, 147–160 (1999)
de Meijer, C., Brouwer, W., Koopmanschap, M., van den Berg, B., van Exel, J.: The value of informal care-a further investigation of the feasibility of contingent valuation in informal caregivers. Health Econ 19, 755–771 (2010)
Koopmanschap, M., van Exel, J.N., van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W.: An overview of methods and applications to value informal care in economic evaluations of healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics 26, 269–280 (2008)
van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W., Koopmanschap, M.: Economic valuation of informal care. An overview of methods and applications. Eur. J. Health Econ. 5, 36–45 (2004)
Hughes, S.L., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Weaver, F.M., Kubal, J.D., Henderson, W.: Relationship between caregiver burden and health-related quality of life. Gerontologist 39, 534–545 (1999)
Schulz, R., Beach, S.R.: Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effects study. Jama 282, 2215–2219 (1999)
Bonsang, E.: Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? J. Health Econ. 28, 143–154 (2009)
Greene, V.L.: Substitution between formally and informally provided care for the impaired elderly in the community. Med. Care 21, 609–619 (1983)
Hanaoka, C., Norton, E.C.: Informal and formal care for elderly persons: how adult children’s characteristics affect the use of formal care in Japan. Soc. Sci. Med. 67, 1002–1008 (2008)
Pezzin, L.E., Kemper, P., Reschovsky, J.D.: Does publicly provided home care substitute for family care? Experimental evidence with endogenous living arrangements. JHR 31, 650–676 (1996)
van Houtven, C.H., Norton, E.C.: Informal care and health care use of older adults. J. Health Econ. 23, 1159–1180 (2004)
Carrière, Y., Martel, L., Légaré, J., Morin, L.: Socio-demographic factors associated with the use of formal and informal support networks among elderly Canadians. In: Zeng, Y., Crimmins, E., Carrière, Y., Robine, J.M. (eds.) Longer Life and Healthy Aging. Springer International Studies in Population, Heidelberg (2006)
Kemper, P.: The use of formal and informal home care by the disabled elderly. Health Serv. Res. 27, 421–451 (1992)
Muramatsu, N., Campbell, R.T.: State expenditures on home and community based services and use of formal and informal personal assistance: a multilevel analysis. J. Health Soc. Behav. 43, 107–124 (2002)
Blomgren, J., Martikainen, P., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S.: Determinants of home-based formal help in community-dwelling older people in Finland. Eur. J. Ageing 5, 335–347 (2008)
Mormiche, P.: The INSEE survey on handicaps, disabilities, and dependency—aims and organization. Courrier des statistiques English series 6, 21–32 (2000)
Aijanseppa, S., Notkola, I.L., Tijhuis, M., van Staveren, W., Kromhout, D., Nissinen, A.: Physical functioning in elderly Europeans: 10 year changes in the north and south: the HALE project. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59, 413–419 (2005)
WHO.: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. World Health Organization, New York (1980)
Katz, S., Ford, A.B., Moskowitz, R.W., Jackson, B.A., Jaffe, M.W.: Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL, a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Jama 185, 914–919 (1963)
Lawton, M.P., Brody, E.M.: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9, 179–186 (1969)
Hausman, J.A., Wise, D.A.: A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica 46, 403–426 (1978)
Woittiez, I., Van Gameren, E., Pommer, E.: International comparison of long-term care use: a micro-analysis of differences between countries. Working paper (2007)
Dow, J.K., Endersby, J.W.: Multinomial probit and multinomial logit: a comparison of choice models for voting research. Elect. Stud. 23, 107–122 (2004)
Keane, M.P.: A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 10, 193–200 (1992)
Alvarez, R.M., Nagler, J.: Economics, issues and the Perot candidacy: voter choice in the 1992 presidential election. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 39, 714–744 (1995)
Rudolph, T.J.: Who’s responsible for the economy? The formation and consequences of responsibility attributions. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 47, 698–713 (2003)
Pampalon, R., Colvez, A., Bucquet, D.: Development of a conversion table relating disability in the elderly to home help needs. Rev. Epidémiol. Santé Pub. 39, 263–273 (1991)
van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W., van Exel, J., Koopmanschap, M., van den Bos, G.A., Rutten, F.: Economic valuation of informal care: lessons from the application of the opportunity costs and proxy good methods. Soc. Sci. Med. 62, 835–845 (2006)
Bressé, S.: L’enjeu de la professionnalisation du secteur de l’aide à domicile en faveur des personnes âgées. Retraite et Société 39, 119–143 (2003)
Breuil-Genier, P.: Caring for the dependent elderly: more informal than formal. INSEE Stud. 39, 1–22 (1999)
Hellstrom, Y., Hallberg, I.R.: Determinants and characteristics of help provision for elderly people living at home and in relation to quality of life. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 18, 387–395 (2004)
Hébert, R., Dubuc, N., Buteau, M., Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Trottier, L., St-Hillaire, C., Roy, C.: Resources and costs associated with disabilities of elderly people living at home and in institutions. Can. J. Aging 20, 1–21 (2001)
Portrait, F., Lindeboom, M., Deeg, D.: The use of long-term care services by the Dutch elderly. Health Econ. 9, 513–531 (2000)
Katz, S.J., Kabeto, M., Langa, K.M.: Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States. Jama 284, 3022–3027 (2000)
Mutchler, J., Bullers, S.: Gender differences in formal care use in later life. Res. Aging 16, 235–250 (1994)
Cour des Comptes.: Les personnes âgées dépendantes: Rapport au Président de la République suivi des réponses des Administrations et des Organismes Intéressés. Direction des Journaux officiels, Paris (2005)
Basdevant, A., Charles, M.A., Detournay, B., Eschwege, E., Fagnani, F., Phillipo, M., Pribil, C., Sermet, C.: Obesity morbidity and health care costs in France: an analysis of the 1991–1992 medical care household survey. Int. J. Obes. 24, 151–155 (2000)
Ricordeau, P., Weill, A., Vallier, N., Bourrel, R., Guilhot, J., Fender, P., Allemand, H.: The prevalence and cost of diabetes in metropolitan France: what trends between 1998 and 2000? Revue Médicale de l’Assurance-Maladie 33, 257–265 (2002)
Boivin, J.M., Zanna, F.: Official recommendations and guidelines for the management and reimbursement of severe hypertension as a chronic disease. La Presse Médicale 38, 652–660 (2009)
Amalric, F.: Analyse économique des coûts du cancer en France. Impact sur la qualité de vie, prévention, dépistage, soins, recherche. Institut National du Cancer, Paris, available online at http://www.e-cancer.fr/ (2007)
Arno, P.S., Levine, C., Memmott, M.M.: The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Aff (Millwood). 18, 182–188 (1999)
LaPlante, M.P., Harrington, C., Kang, T.: Estimating paid and unpaid hours of personal assistance services in activities of daily living provided to adults living at home. Health Serv. Res. 37, 397–415 (2002)
O’Shea, E., Blackwell, J.: The relationship between the cost of community care and the dependency of old people. Soc. Sci. Med. 37, 583–590 (1993)
Yoo, B.K., Bhattacharya, J., McDonald, K.M., Garber, A.M.: Impacts of informal caregiver availability on long-term care expenditures in OECD countries. Health Serv. Res. 39, 1971–1992 (2004)
Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations: Rapport Annuel. Cour des Comptes, Paris (2003)
Heitmueller, A., Inglis, K.: The earnings of informal carers: wage differentials and opportunity costs. J. Health Econ. 26, 821–841 (2007)
Schulz, R., Mendelsohn, A.B., Haley, W.E., Mahoney, D., Allen, R.S., Zhang, S., Thompson, L., Belle, S.H.: End-of-life care and the effects of bereavement on family caregivers of persons with dementia. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1936–1942 (2003)
National Alliance for Caregiving: The MetLife study of employer costs for working caregivers. MetLife Mature Market Institute: Westport (1997)
Chenier, M.C.: Review and analysis of caregiver burden and nursing home placement. Geriatr. Nurs. 18, 121–126 (1997)
Gaymu, J., Ekamper, P., Beets, G.: Future trends in health and marital status: effects on the structure of living arrangements of older Europeans in 2030. Eur. J. Ageing 5, 5–17 (2008)
Geerlings, S.W., Pot, A.M., Twisk, J.W.R., Deeg, D.J.H.: Predicting transitions in the use of informal and professional care by older adults. Ageing Soc. 25, 111–130 (2005)
Allen, S.M., Mor, V.: The prevalence and consequences of unmet need. Contrasts between older and younger adults with disability. Med. Care 35, 1132–1148 (1997)
Kennedy, J.: Unmet and under-met need for activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living assistance among adults with disabilities: estimates from the 1994 and 1995 disability follow-back surveys. Med. Care 39, 1305–1312 (2001)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the ANR (French National Research Agency) for financial support from the Young Researcher program (ANR-06-JCJC-0022) and the joint program CNSA-INSERM-HAS-MiRe-DREES “Handicap 2007” of IRESP (French Institute for Public Health Research). At the time of this research, Bérengère Davin was a post-doctoral research fellow of the FLARE (Future Leaders of Ageing Research in Europe) program of ERA-AGE (European Research Area in Ageing), funded by the Caisse Nationale de Solidarité pour l’Autonomie (CNSA). She thanks the Foundation Médéric Alzheimer for the PhD Thesis Award 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paraponaris, A., Davin, B. & Verger, P. Formal and informal care for disabled elderly living in the community: an appraisal of French care composition and costs. Eur J Health Econ 13, 327–336 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0305-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0305-3
Keywords
- Ageing
- Activities of daily living (ADL and IADL)
- Formal and informal care
- Economic evaluation
- Social inequalities