Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This contribution seeks to measure preferences for health insurance of individuals with and without chronic conditions in two countries, Germany and the Netherlands. The objective is to test the presumption that preferences between these two subpopulations differ and to see whether having a chronic condition has a different influence on preferences depending on the country. The evidence comes from two Discrete Choice Experiments performed in 2005 (Germany) and 2006 (the Netherlands, right after a major health reform). Results point to an even more marked resistance against restrictions of physician choice among individuals with chronic conditions in both countries. Thus, the alleged beneficiaries of Disease Management Programs would have to be highly compensated for accepting the restrictions that go with them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartholomee, Y., Maarse, H.: Empowering the chronically ill? Patient collectives in the new Dutch health insurance system. Health Policy 84(2–3), 162–169 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete choice analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck, M., Gyrd-Hansen, D.: Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 14, 1079–1083 (2005). doi:10.1002/hec.984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham, P.J., Denk, C.: Do consumers know how their health plan works? Health Aff. 20(2), 159–166 (2001). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Douven, R., Lieverdink, H., Ligthart, M., Vermeulen, I.: Measuring short-term price elasticities in Dutch health insurance: a new method (June 14, 2007). iHEA 2007 6th World Congress: Explorations in Health Economics Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=993741

  6. Glazer, J., McGuire, T.: Optimal risk adjustment in markets with adverse selection: an application to managed care. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 1055–1071 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Green, D., Benedict, I.: Health care in France and Germany: lessons for the UK. Civitas, Institute for the Study of Civil Society, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hensher, D., Louviere, J., Swait, J.: Combining sources of preference data. J. Econom. 89, 197–231 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00061-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Jong, J.D., Van den Brink-Muinen, A., et al.: The Dutch health insurance reform: switching between insurers. A comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabled. BMC Health Serv. Res 8, 5 (2008). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Louviere, J.L., Hensher, D.A., et al.: Stated choice methods. Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in econometrics, pp. 105–142. Academic Press, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports (2008, February 25, 2008), Health insurance system, Retrieved 29 April 2008

  13. Okma, K.G.H.: Health care, health policies and health care reforms in the Netherlands. Ministry of Health, The Hague (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.: Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets. An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Q. J. Econ. 90(4), 629–649 (1976). doi:10.2307/1885326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schreyögg, J., Markus, G.: Copayments for ambulatory care in Germany: a natural experiment using a difference-in-difference approach, SOEP paper (96). German Institute for Economics, Berlin, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schut, F.I.: Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands: a model for the United States? Health Aff. 27(3), 771–781 (2008). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tamm, M., Tauchmann, H., Wasem, J., Greß, S.: Elasticities of market shares and social health insurance choice in Germany: a dynamic panel data approach. Health Econ. 16(3), 243–256 (2007). doi:10.1002/hec.1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. WHO: Health for all Database, World Health Organization (2008)

  19. Zweifel, P., Breuer, M.: The case for risk-based premiums in public health insurance, health economics. Policy Law 1(2), 171–188 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zweifel, P., Breyer, F., Kifmann, M.: Health economics, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Helpful suggestions and criticisms were provided by participants of the Ottobeuren 2008 workshop (in particular Stefan Felder) as well as Harry Telser and Karen Becker (Polynomics Inc.), and Stephanie Berner (University of Zurich). Financial support by the Bertelsmann Foundation and Büchner Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Janet MacNeil Vroomen & Peter Zweifel

Authors
  1. Janet MacNeil Vroomen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Zweifel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Zweifel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vroomen, J.M., Zweifel, P. Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German?. Eur J Health Econ 12, 87–95 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-010-0248-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-010-0248-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation