Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modelling health expenditure at the household level in Greece

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health expenditure data are known to be afflicted by restricted range, zero values, skewness and kurtosis. Several methods for modelling such data have been suggested in the literature to cope with these problems. This paper compares the performance of several alternative estimators, including two-part models and generalised linear models. The dependent variable is household expenditure on health care in Greece, a country where out-of-pocket health expenditure is higher than anywhere else in the European Union, whether as a proportion of GDP, as a share of all health spending, or in per capita terms. To facilitate comparison of model performance, household health expenditure is examined in two different specifications: expenditure on all health care (where zero values are rare) and expenditure on hospital services alone (where zero values are common). In the case of expenditure on all health care, three of the estimators performed almost equally well in terms of three alternative model performance indicators: a modified two-part model with non-linear least squares in the second part, a constant-variance generalised linear model and a variance-proportional-to-mean generalised linear model. In the case of expenditure on hospital services, the constant-variance generalised linear model out-performed the rest. The findings suggest that no estimator is best under all circumstances, while most alternative estimators are likely to produce relatively similar results. The paper concludes by discussing implications for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basu, A., Manning, W.G., Mullahy, J.: Comparing alternative models: log vs Cox proportional hazard? Health Econ. 13, 749–765 (2004). doi:10.1002/hec.852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blough, D.K., Madden, C.W., Hornbrook, M.C.: Modeling risk using generalized linear models. J. Health Econ. 18, 153–171 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00032-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buntin, M.B., Zaslavsky, A.M.: Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling medicare expenditures. J. Health Econ. 23, 525–542 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantoni, E., Ronchetti, E.: A robust approach for skewed and heavy-tailed outcomes in the analysis of health care expenditures. J. Health Econ. 25, 198–213 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, P., Trivedi, P.K.: The structure of demand for health care: latent class versus two-part models. J. Health Econ. 21, 601–625 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00008-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diehr, P., Yanez, D., Ash, A., Hornbrook, M., Lin, D.Y.: Methods for analyzing health care utilization and costs. Annu. Rev. Public Health 20, 125–144 (1999). doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan, N.: Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78, 605–610 (1983). doi:10.2307/2288126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duan, N., Manning, W.G., Morris, C.N., Newhouse, J.P.: A comparison of alternative models of the demand for medical care. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 1, 115–126 (1983). doi:10.2307/1391852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Health, O.E.C.D.: Data Version 26 June 2006. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, A.M.: Health econometrics. In Culyer, A.J., Newhouse, J.P. (eds.) Handbook of Health Economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2000)

  11. Manning, W.G.: The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J. Health Econ. 17, 283–295 (1998). doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00025-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manning, W.G., Mullahy, J.: Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J. Health Econ. 20, 461–494 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manning, W.G., Newhouse, J.P., Duan, N., Keeler, E.B., Leibowitz, A., Marquis, M.S.: Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 77, 251–277 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manning, W.G., Basu, A., Mullahy, J.: Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J. Health Econ. 24, 465–488 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A.: Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mossialos, E., Allin, S., Davaki, K.: Analysing the Greek health system: a tale of fragmentation and inertia. Health Econ. 14, S151–S168 (2005). doi:10.1002/hec.1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mullahy, J.: Much ado about two: reconsidering retransformation and the two-part model in health econometrics. J. Health Econ. 17, 247–281 (1998). doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00030-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siskou, O., Kaitelidou, D., Papakonstantinou, V., Liaropoulos, L.: Private health expenditure in the Greek health care system: where truth ends and the myth begins. Health Policy (forthcoming). doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.016

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for comments and suggestions to Heather Gibson and two anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manos Matsaganis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsaganis, M., Mitrakos, T. & Tsakloglou, P. Modelling health expenditure at the household level in Greece. Eur J Health Econ 10, 329–336 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-008-0137-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-008-0137-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation