Abstract
In March 2003 the Norwegian government implemented yardstick-based price regulation schemes on a selection of drugs subjected to generic competition. The retail price cap, termed the “index price,” on a drug (chemical substance) was set equal to the average of the three lowest producer prices on that drug, plus a fixed wholesale and retail margin. This is supposed to lower barriers of entry for generic drugs and to trigger price competition. Using monthly data over the period 1998–2004 for the six drugs (chemical entities) included in the index price system, we estimate a structural model enabling us to examine the impact of the reform on both demand and market power. Our results suggest that the index price helped to increase the market shares of generic drugs and succeeded in triggering price competition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete choice model of product differentiation. Rand J Econ 25: 242–262
Berry ST, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63: 841–890
Berndt ER, Pindyck RS, og Azolay P (2003) Consumption externalities and diffusion in pharmaceutical markets: antiulcer drugs. J Ind Econ 51: 243–270
Brenkers R, Verboven F (2002) Liberalizing a distribution system the European car market. CEPR discussion papers no 3622
Caves RE, Whinston MD, Hurwitz MA (1991) Patent expiry and competition in the US phamaceutical industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 1–48
Frank RG, Salkever DS (1997) Generic entry and the pricing of pharmaceuticals. J Econ Manage Strategy 75–90
Grabowski H, Vernon J (1992) Brand loyalty; entry, and price competition in pharmaceuticals after the 1984 drug act. J Law Econ 35
Hausman J, Leonard G, Zona D (1994) Competitive analysis with differentiated products. Ann Econ Stat 34: 159–180
Hellerstein J (1998) The importance of physician in the generic versus-trade name prescription decision. Rand J Econ 29: 109–136
Hudson J (2000) Generic take-up in the pharmaceutical market following patent expiry. A multi-country study. Int Rev Law Econ 20: 205–221
Nevo A (2000) Mergers with differentiated products: the case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Rand J Econ 31: 395–421
Pavknic N (2002) Do pharmaceutical prices respond to patient out-of-pocket expenses? Rand J Econ 33: 469–487
Razzolini T (2004) The Norwegian market for pharmaceuticals and the non-mandatory substitution reform of 2001: the case of enalapril. Memorandum 12/04. Oslo: Department of Economics, University of Oslo
Stern S, Trajtenberg M (1998) Empirical implications of physician authority in pharmaceutical decisionmaking. NBER working paper 6851
Winkelmann R (2004) Co-payments for prescription drugs and the demand for doctor visits—evidence from a natural experiment. Health Econ 13: 1081–1089
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Norwegian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged. We thank two referees for their comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalen, D.M., Strøm, S. & Haabeth, T. Price regulation and generic competition in the pharmaceutical market. Eur J Health Econ 7, 204–211 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0357-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0357-y