Skip to main content
Log in

Price regulation and generic competition in the pharmaceutical market

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In March 2003 the Norwegian government implemented yardstick-based price regulation schemes on a selection of drugs subjected to generic competition. The retail price cap, termed the “index price,” on a drug (chemical substance) was set equal to the average of the three lowest producer prices on that drug, plus a fixed wholesale and retail margin. This is supposed to lower barriers of entry for generic drugs and to trigger price competition. Using monthly data over the period 1998–2004 for the six drugs (chemical entities) included in the index price system, we estimate a structural model enabling us to examine the impact of the reform on both demand and market power. Our results suggest that the index price helped to increase the market shares of generic drugs and succeeded in triggering price competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete choice model of product differentiation. Rand J Econ 25: 242–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry ST, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63: 841–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berndt ER, Pindyck RS, og Azolay P (2003) Consumption externalities and diffusion in pharmaceutical markets: antiulcer drugs. J Ind Econ 51: 243–270

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brenkers R, Verboven F (2002) Liberalizing a distribution system the European car market. CEPR discussion papers no 3622

  5. Caves RE, Whinston MD, Hurwitz MA (1991) Patent expiry and competition in the US phamaceutical industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 1–48

  6. Frank RG, Salkever DS (1997) Generic entry and the pricing of pharmaceuticals. J Econ Manage Strategy 75–90

  7. Grabowski H, Vernon J (1992) Brand loyalty; entry, and price competition in pharmaceuticals after the 1984 drug act. J Law Econ 35

  8. Hausman J, Leonard G, Zona D (1994) Competitive analysis with differentiated products. Ann Econ Stat 34: 159–180

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hellerstein J (1998) The importance of physician in the generic versus-trade name prescription decision. Rand J Econ 29: 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hudson J (2000) Generic take-up in the pharmaceutical market following patent expiry. A multi-country study. Int Rev Law Econ 20: 205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nevo A (2000) Mergers with differentiated products: the case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Rand J Econ 31: 395–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pavknic N (2002) Do pharmaceutical prices respond to patient out-of-pocket expenses? Rand J Econ 33: 469–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Razzolini T (2004) The Norwegian market for pharmaceuticals and the non-mandatory substitution reform of 2001: the case of enalapril. Memorandum 12/04. Oslo: Department of Economics, University of Oslo

  14. Stern S, Trajtenberg M (1998) Empirical implications of physician authority in pharmaceutical decisionmaking. NBER working paper 6851

  15. Winkelmann R (2004) Co-payments for prescription drugs and the demand for doctor visits—evidence from a natural experiment. Health Econ 13: 1081–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Norwegian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged. We thank two referees for their comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dag Morten Dalen.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 present the observed prices per DDD and market share in the six markets considered, annual means of monthly data, Norway 1998–2004

Table 5 ATC code A02BC01, branded drug producer: Astra Zeneca; strength 20 (in Norwegian crowns)
Table 6 ATC code C09AA02, branded drug producer: MSD; strength 20 (in Norwegian crowns)
Table 7 ATC code C09AA03, branded drug producer: Astra Zeneca; strength 10 (in Norwegian crowns)
Table 8 ATC code N06AB04, branded drug producer: H. Lundbeck; strength 20 (in Norwegian crowns)
Table 9 ATC code R06AE07, branded drug producer: UCB Pharma; strength 10 (in Norwegian crowns)
Table 10 ATC code R06AX13, branded drug producer: Schering-Pl; strength 10 (in Norwegian crowns)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalen, D.M., Strøm, S. & Haabeth, T. Price regulation and generic competition in the pharmaceutical market. Eur J Health Econ 7, 204–211 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0357-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0357-y

Keywords

Navigation