Abstract
Notwithstanding its widespread use, the standard questionnaire used to elicit visual analogue scale valuations for EQ-5D states is well known to suffer from problems with missing values (particularly for the state ‘dead’) and logical inconsistencies. This contribution reports on efforts to redesign the questionnaire to overcome these problems and the results from its use in a pilot study. The redesigned questionnaire asks respondents to provide a numerical score for each state (instead of drawing lines to a visual analogue scale) and employs a new method for valuing ‘dead’. A pilot study was undertaken to gauge the effects of these innovations, over and above other cosmetic changes to the questionnaire. The redesigned questionnaire was found to result in fewer missing values, fewer exclusions and fewer logical inconsistencies. Mean re-scaled values for the health states remained virtually identical. The results suggest that scoring is a better way of eliciting self-completed valuations than scaling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press: Oxford
Parkin D, Devlin N (2004) Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost utility analysis? Economics discussion paper, April 2003. Economics Department, City University, London ( http://www.city.ac.uk/economics/discussionpapers.htm)
Johnson J, Pickard A (2000) Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada. Med Care 38:115–121
Ohinmaa A, Eija H, Sintonen H (1995) Modelling EuroQol values of Finnish adult population. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A (eds) EuroQol plenary meeting 1995. Institut Universitari de Salut Publica de Catalunya, Barcelona, pp 67–76
Schulenburg J-M Graf von der, Claes C, Greiner W, Uber A (1996) The German version of the EuroQol quality of life questionnaire. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A (eds) EuroQol plenary meeting 1995. Institut Universitari de Salut Publica de Catalunya, Barcelona, pp 135–160
Claes C, Greiner W, Uber A, Schulenburg J-M Graf von der (1999) An interview-based comparison of the TTO and VAS values given to EuroQol states of health by the general German population. In: Greiner W, Schulenburg J-M Graf von der, Piercy J (eds) EuroQol plenary meeting 1998. Universität Hannover, Hannover, pp 13–38
Ikeda S, Sakai I, Tamura M, Tsuchiya A (2000) VAS valuations of hypothetical health states using EQ-5D in Japan. In: Cabases JM, Gaminde I (eds) Proceedings of the 17th plenary meeting of the EuroQol Group. Universidad Publica de Navarra, Pamplona, pp 47–60
Essink-Bot M, Stouthard M, Bonsel G (1993) Generalizability of valuations on health states collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Health Econ 2:237–246
Devlin N, Hansen P, Kind P, Williams A (2003) Logical inconsistencies in survey respondents’ health state valuations—a methodological challenge for estimating social tariffs. Health Econ 12:529–544
Prevolnik Rupel V, Rebolj M (2000) The Slovenian VAS tariff based on valuations of EQ-5D health states from the general population. In: Cabases JM, Gaminde I (eds) Proceedings of the 17th plenary meeting of the EuroQol Group. Universidad Publica de Navarra, Pamplona, pp 23–46
Gaminde I, Cabases J (1996) Measuring valuations for health states amongst the general population in Navarra (Spain). In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A (eds) EuroQol plenary meeting 1995. Institut Universitari de Salut Publica de Catalunya, Barcelona, pp 113–122
Badia X, Roset M, Monserrat S, Herdman M (1997) The Spanish VAS tariff based on valuation of EQ-5D health states from the general population. In: Rabin R, Busschbach J van, Charro F de, Essink-Bot M, Bonsel G (eds) EuroQol plenary meeting Rotterdam 1997. Centre for Health Policy and Law, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, pp 93–114
Bjork S, Norinder A (1999) The weighting exercise for the Swedish version of the EuroQol. Health Econ 8:117–126
Dolan P, Kind P (1996) Inconsistency and health state valuations. Social Sci Med 42:609–615
Macran S, Kind P (2000) EQ-5D Valuations from a British national postal survey. In: Cabases JM, Gaminde I (eds) Proceedings of the 17th plenary meeting of the EuroQol Group. Universidad Publica de Navarra, Pamplona, pp 87–102
Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A (1994) The measurement and valuation of health. First report on the main survey. MVH Group, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York
Johnson JA, Coons SJ, Ergo A, Szavakovats G (1998) Valuation of EuroQol (EQ-5D) health state in an adult US sample. Pharmacoeconomics 13:421–433
Greiner W, Weinjen T, Nieuwnhuizen M, Oppe S, de Charro F (2003) A European EQ-5D VAS valuation set. In: Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F (eds) The measurement and valuation of health status using the EQ-5D: a European perspective. Kluwer, Amsterdam
Badia X, Monserrat S, Roset M, Herdman M (1999) Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off. Quality Life Res 8:303–310
Brooks R, for the EuroQol Group (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72
Selai C (1999) The problems of inconsistencies in elicited EuroQol values. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Roset M (eds) Proceedings of the 16th plenary meeting of the EuroQol Group. Institut de Salut Publica de Catalunya Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, pp 93–98
Devlin N, Hansen P, Selai C (2004) Understanding health state valuations: a qualitative analysis of respondents’ comments. Quality Life Res 13:1265–1277
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1994) 1991 census topics report for health areas, Great Britain. HMSO, London
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1997) 1991 census key statistics for new health areas. HMSO, London
Gudex C, Kind P, Dolan P (1993) The valuation of death. In: Sintonen H (ed) EuroQol conference proceedings. Kuopio University, Helsinki, pp 23–41
Kind P (2003) Guidelines for value sets in economic and non-economic studies using EQ-5D. In: Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F (eds) The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective. Kluwer, Amsterdam
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the persons who completed the questionnaires. We also thank Richard Brooks, Paul Kind, David Parkin and Alan Williams for their comments and suggestions on the prototype questionnaire, and other members of the EuroQol Group for comments on an earlier version of this paper presented to the 19th Scientific Meeting of the EuroQol Group, University of York, 2002. The survey reported in this study was funded by a grant from the EuroQol Foundation, 2002. The design and data collection phases were undertaken while Nancy Devlin was employed by the King’s Fund.
Conflict of interest:
No information supplied
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Devlin, N., Hansen, P., Herbison, P. et al. A ‘new and improved’ EQ-5D valuation questionnaire?. Eur J Health Econ 6, 73–82 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0263-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0263-0