Skip to main content
Log in

Side effects of generic competition?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between generic drug market shares and the number of reported side effects. Yearly time-series data for the number of reported side effects and information on market shares, prices, and quantities from 1972 to 1996 were used in this study. Poisson and negative binomial regression models were used in the statistical analysis. The results show that increased generic market share increases the number of reported side effects for all estimated models. When studying the relationship at the substance level, increasing generic market shares increases the number of side effects for 7 of the 15 substances. Generic substitution laws and measures to increase generic competition may thus have unintended consequences since these results show a positive relationship between generic market shares and reported side effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ganguli R (2002) Rationale and strategies for switching antipsychotics. Am J Health Syst Pharm 59:522–526

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein JM, Cantillion M (1998) Safety of switching to quetiapine furmarate. Presented at the 151th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. Toronto, Canada, 30 May 30–4 June

  3. Kinon BJ, Basson BR, Gilmore JA, Malcolm S, Stauffer VL (2000) Strategies for switching from conventional antipsychotic drugs or risperidone to olanzapine. J Clin Psychiatry 61:833–840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartley K, Lavers RJ, Maynard AK (1986) Regulation and development times in the UK pharmaceutical industry. Scott J Polit Econ 33:355–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson F, Hertzman P (1993) Effective patent life of drugs in Sweden—a comparison with international studies. Manag Dec Econ 14:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rudholm N (2001) Entry and the number of firms in the Swedish pharmaceuticals market. Rev Ind Organ 19:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kendall KW, Ng S, Schoner B (1991) Consumer responses to generic/chemically equivalent drugs. J Public Policy Marketing, 10:182–201

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cameron AC, Trivedi P (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hausman JA, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents—R and D relationship. Econometrica 52:909–938

    Google Scholar 

  10. LVFS (1996) 4 Läkemedelsverkets föreskrifter och allmäna råd om säkerhets-övervakning av läkemedel

  11. SFS (1993) 1057 Förordning om viss uppgiftsskyldighet inom hälso-och sjuk-vården

  12. SFS (1994) 1521 Förordning om biverkningsregister angående läkemedel

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Jonas Bergwall, two anonymous referees, and the participants at a seminar at Umeå University for valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflict of interest:

No information supplied

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörgen Hellström.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellström, J., Rudholm, N. Side effects of generic competition?. Eur J Health Econom 5, 203–208 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0234-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0234-5

Keywords

Navigation