Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maximum intensity projection as a tool to diagnose early rheumatoid arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modern Rheumatology

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced MRI with maximum intensity projection (MIP) as a convenient tool for detecting early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of 21 patients with undiagnosed arthritis of the hands at the initial visit were enrolled in a prospective study over a 1-year period. The number of swollen joints found during physical examination at this first visit, the results of serological tests and the number of synovitis joints diagnosed on MIP images were compared between the RA group and non-RA group. Of the 21 patients, 17 (81%) from the initial study who were followed up for an additional 1 year entered this study. Of these, 5 met the conditions for diagnosis of RA during follow-up, and 12 did not. MIP images were used to review the arthritis of RA patients, and a significant difference was found in the number of synovitis inflammations detected with MIP images when compared with findings after physical examinations. The two criteria of positive CARF and/or anti-CCP antibody and symmetrical synovitis in bilateral hands on MIP images allowed the prediction of RA with 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Thus, MIP is a useful tool for making early diagnosis of RA because it yields clear visualization even with just one image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Combe B, Landewe R, Lukas C, Bolosiu HD, Breedveld F, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:34–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fishman EK, Ney DR, Heath DG, Corl FM, Horton KM, Johnson PT. Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. Radiographics 2006;26:905–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Forslind K, Larsson EM, Johansson A, Svensson B. Detection of joint pathology by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1997;36:683–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs HA, Kaye JJ, Callahan LF, Nance EP, Pincus T. Evidence of significant radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis within the first 2 years of disease. J Rheumatol 1989;16:585–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goupille P, Roulot B, Akoka S, Avimadje AM, Garaud P, Naccache L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: a valuable method for the detection of synovial inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2001; 28:35–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haavardsholm EA, Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg BJ, Kvan NP, Uhlig TA, Lilleas FG, et al. Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3860–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawakami A, Tamai M, Eguchi K. [Classification of early arthritis patients and how to determine disease severity]. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi 2007;30:37–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shio K, Homma F, Kanno Y, Yamadera Y, Ohguchi Y, Nishimaki T, Kanno T, Kasukawa R. Doppler sonographic comparative study on usefulness of synovial vascularity between knee and metacarpophalangeal joints for evaluation of articular inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by infliximab. Mod Rheumatol 2006;16:220–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klarlund M, Ostergaard M, Jensen KE, Madsen JL, Skjodt H, Lorenzen I. Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis. The TIRA group. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:521–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McQueen FM. Magnetic resonance imaging in early inflammatory arthritis: what is its role? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:700–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McQueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Tan PL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:350–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okumura A, Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Ishimori T, Amoh Y, Oda K, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR portography. Radiographics 1999;19:973–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg B. Magnetic resonance imaging of the synovium in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004;8:287–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg B, Szkudlarek M. Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: roles of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, conventional radiography and computed tomography. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005;19:91–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ostergaard M, Klarlund M. Importance of timing of post-contrast MRI in rheumatoid arthritis: what happens during the first 60 minutes after IV gadolinium-DTPA? Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:1050–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ostergaard M, McQueen FM, Bird P, Ejbjerg B, Lassere MN, Peterfy CG, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis advances and research priorities. J Rheumatol 2005;32:2462–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugimoto H, Takeda A, Hyodoh K. Early-stage rheumatoid arthritis: prospective study of the effectiveness of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 2000;216:569–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamai K, Yamato M, Yamaguchi T, Ohno W. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37:1151–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamai M, Kawakami A, Uetani M, Takao S, Rashid H, Tanaka F, et al. Early prediction of rheumatoid arthritis by serological variables and magnetic resonance imaging of the wrists and finger joints: results from prospective clinical examination. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:134–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamai M, Kawakami A, Uetani M, Takao S, Tanaka F, Nakamura H, et al. The presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody is associated with magnetic resonance imaging detection of bone marrow oedema in early stage rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:133–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamato M, Tamai K, Yamaguchi T, Ohno W. MRI of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis: Gd-DTPA perfusion dynamics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:781–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisaku Tokunaga.

About this article

Cite this article

Mori, G., Tokunaga, D., Takahashi, K.A. et al. Maximum intensity projection as a tool to diagnose early rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 18, 247–251 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-008-0043-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-008-0043-2

Keywords

Navigation