Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of valuable relationship on reconciliation and initiator of reconciliation in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconciliation, post-conflict affiliation between former opponents, was suggested to repair the relationship between former opponents. The number of times that each former opponent initiates reconciliation may be affected by the dominance style. Despotic dominance style was suggested to restrain the initiation of reconciliation by recipients of aggression, unlike relaxed dominance style. Although reconciliation was suggested to restore relationships, reconciliation sometimes did not occur. The valuable relationship hypothesis predicts that reconciliation is more likely to occur when former opponents share a valuable relationship. However, few studies have tested this hypothesis in non-primate species. This study investigated, in captive bottlenose dolphins, which are suggested as having a relaxed dominance style, whether aggressors or recipients of aggression initiate reconciliation, and whether relationships between former opponents affect the occurrence of reconciliation. The number of times that aggressors or recipients of aggression initiate reconciliation did not differ. Recipients of aggression initiated reconciliation sooner than aggressors. These results support the prospect that recipients of aggression are not impeded in initiating reconciliation in relaxed species. Former opponents who share a more affiliative relationship were reconciled more frequently. Bottlenose dolphins were suggested to receive the benefits from individuals who shared more affiliative relationships. The valuable relationship hypothesis may be supported in bottlenose dolphins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aureli F, van Schaik CP (1991) Post-conflict behaviour in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) II. Coping with the uncertainty. Ethology 89:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aureli F, Cords M, van Schaik CP (2002) Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. Anim Behav 64:325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baan C, Bergmüller R, Smith DW, Molnar B (2014) Conflict management in free-ranging wolves, Canis lupus. Anim Behav 90:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björnsdotter M, Larsson L, Ljungberg T (2000) Post-conflict affiliation in two captive groups of black-and-white guereza Colobus guereza. Ethology 106:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Aureli F, de Waal FBM (1999) Reconciliation patterns among stumptailed macaques: a multivariate approach. Anim Behav 58:165–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castles DL, Whiten A (1998) Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons II. Stress and self-directed behaviour. Ethology 104:148–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles DL, Aureli F, de Waal FB (1996) Variation in conciliatory tendency and relationship quality across groups of pigtail macaques. Anim Behav 52:389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor RC, Wells RS, Mann J, Read AJ (2000) The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission–fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 91–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor R, Mann J, Watson-Capps J (2006) A sex-specific affiliative contact behavior in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops sp. Ethology 112:631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cools AKA, van Hout AJM, Nelissen MHJ (2008) Canine reconciliation and third-party-initiated post conflict affiliation: do peacemaking social mechanisms in dogs rival those of higher primates? Ethology 114:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper MA, Bernstein IS (2002) Counter aggression and reconciliation in Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). Am J Primatol 56:215–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordoni G, Palagi E (2008) Reconciliation in wolves (Canis lupus): new evidence for a comparative perspective. Ethology 114:298–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cords M (1997) Friendships, alliances, reciprocity and repair. In: Whiten A, Byrne RW (eds) Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 24–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal FBM, Luttrell L (1989) Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: different dominance style in rhesus and stumptail monkeys. Am J Primato 19:83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal FBM, Ren R (1988) Comparison of the reconciliation behavior of stumptail and rhesus macaques. Ethology 78:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal FBM, Yoshihara D (1983) Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. Behaviour 85:224–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demaria C, Thierry B (2001) A comparative study of reconciliation in rhesus and Tonkean macaques. Behaviour 138:397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudzinski KM, Gregg JD, Ribic CA, Kuczaj SA (2009) A comparison of pectoral fin contact between two different wild dolphin populations. Behav Processes 80:182–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser ON, Bugnyar T (2011) Ravens reconcile after aggressive conflicts with valuable partners. PLoS One 6:e18118. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Koski SE, Koops K, Sterck EHM (2007) Reconciliation, relationship quality, and postconflict anxiety: testing the integrated hypothesis in captive chimpanzees. Am J Primatol 69:158–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutsukake N, Castles DL (2001) Reconciliation and variation in post-conflict stress in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata): testing the integrated hypothesis. Anim Cogn 4:259–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutsukake N, Castles D (2004) Reconciliation and post-conflict third-party affiliation among wild chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Primates 45:157–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palagi E, Antonacci D, Norscia I (2008) Peacemaking on treetops: first evidence of reconciliation from a wild prosimian (Propithecus verreauxi). Anim Behav 76:737–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R development core team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation For Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/

  • Sakai M, Hishii T, Takeda S, Kohshima S (2006) Flipper rubbing behaviors in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Mar Mammal Sci 22:966–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai M, Morisaka T, Kogi K, Hishii T, Kohshima S (2010) Fine-scale analysis of synchronous breathing in wild Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Behav Processes 83:48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels A, Gifford T (1997) A quantitative assessment of dominance relations among bottlenose dolphins. Mar Mammal Sci 13:70–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schino G (1998) Reconciliation in domestic goats. Behaviour 135:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schülke O, Ostber J (2012) Ecological and social influences on sociality. In: Mitani JC, Call J, Kappeler PM, Palombit RA, Silk JB (eds) The evolution of primate societies. The University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 195–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB (2002) Kin selection in primate groups. Int J Primatol 23:849–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamaki N, Morisaka T, Taki M (2006) Does body contact contribute towards repairing relationships? Behav Processes 73:209–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahaj SA, Guse KR, Holekamp KE (2001) Reconciliation in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Ethology 107:1057–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver A (2003) Conflict and reconciliation in captive bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Mar Mammal Sci 19:836–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells RS (1991) The role of long-term study in understanding the social structure of bottlenose dolphin community. In: Pryor K, Norris KS (eds) Dolphin societies: discoveries and puzzles. University of California press, California, pp 199–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells RS (2014) Social structure and life history of bottlenose dolphins near Sarasota Bay, Florida: insights from four decades and five generations. In: Yamagiwa J, Karczmarski L (eds) Primates and cetaceans, primatology monographs. Springer, Japan, pp 149–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wells RS, Scott MD, Irvine AB (1987) The social structure of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins. In: Genoways HH (ed) Current mammalogy. Springer, US, pp 247–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig RM, Boesch C (2003) The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour 140:1527–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto C, Morisaka T, Furuta K, Ishibashi T, Yoshida A, Taki M, Mori Y, Amano M (2015) Post–conflict affiliation as conflict management in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Sci Rep 5:14275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to members of Shimonoseki Marine Science Museum, especially Toshiyuki Tatsukawa and Kazutaka Harada, and members of Kagoshima City Aquarium, especially Kyoko Sasaki and Nobuyuki Kashiwagi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Fisheries Science and Environmental Studies, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki, 852-8521, Japan

    Chisato Yamamoto & Masao Amano

  2. Shimonoseki Marine Science Museum, 6-1 Arcaport, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, 750-0036, Japan

    Toshiaki Ishibashi

  3. Kagoshima City Aquarium, 3-1 Honkoushinmachi, Kagoshima, 892-0814, Japan

    Akihiko Yoshida

Authors
  1. Chisato Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toshiaki Ishibashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akihiko Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masao Amano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chisato Yamamoto.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamamoto, C., Ishibashi, T., Yoshida, A. et al. Effect of valuable relationship on reconciliation and initiator of reconciliation in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Ethol 34, 147–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0459-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0459-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation