Skip to main content
Log in

Is passive observation of habituated animals truly passive?

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term “habituated” is sometimes used to imply that animals no longer respond to the presence of a human observer. There is an accumulating body of evidence, however, suggesting that habituated animals that no longer perceive humans as a direct threat nevertheless continue to respond to their presence in other ways. Data were collected from a troop of free-ranging vervet monkeys in the Klein Karoo of South Africa for months 5–12 of their habituation period to determine how self-directed behaviour (SDB) was affected by human presence across time. SDB decreased across the 8 month period, indicating that habituation was ongoing. The human observer’s location in relation to the focal animal had a significant effect on SDB. Furthermore, when the habituation period was divided into an early and a late phase this pattern did not arise until the later habituation period (9–12 months). This evidence suggests that animals continue to respond to human presence as they become habituated, although the observed responses change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beausoleil N, Stafford K, Mellor D (2006) Does direct human eye contact function as a warning cue for domestic sheep (Ovis aries)? J Comp Psychol 120(3):269–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Finn H, Allen S (2009) Impact assessment research: use and misuse of habituation, sensitisation and tolerance in describing wildlife responses to anthropogenic stimuli. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell L, Young T (1993) Human presence reduces predation in a free-ranging vervet monkey population in Kenya. Anim Behav 45(6):1233–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack K, Lenz B, Healan E, Rudman S, Schoof V, Fedigan L (2008) The effects of observer presence on the behavior of Cebus capucinus in Costa Rica. Am J Primatol 70(5):490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight J (2009) Making wildlife viewable: habituation and attraction. Soc Anim 17(2):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall P, Forshaw N, Barrett L, Henzi S (2010) Leaving home: responses to water depletion by vervet monkeys. J Arid Environ 74(8):924–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T, Matsusaka T, McGrew W (2009) Emergence, propagation or disappearance of novel behavioral patterns in the habituated chimpanzees of Mahale: a review. Primates 50(1):23–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen D (1991) Observer influence on range use of Macaca arctoides after 14 years of observation. Lab Prim Newsl 30:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A, Knight R (2003) Wildlife responses to recreation and associated visitor perceptions. Ecol Appl 13(4):951–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe W (1963) Learning and instinct in animals. Methuen and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Boersma P, Wingfield J (2006) Habituation of adult Magellanic penguins to human visitation as expressed through behavior and corticosterone secretion. Conserv Biol 20(1):146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb N, Blumstein D (2005) Variation in human disturbance differentially affects predation risk assessment in western gulls. Condor 107(1):178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker D, Knight R (1998) Understanding wildlife responses to humans. Wildl Soc Bull 26(2):312–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson E, Feistner A (2003) Habituating primates: processes, techniques, variables and ethics. In: Setchell JM, Curtis DJ (eds) Field and laboratory methods in primatology: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mark and Sarah Tompkins for permission to work on their property. Dr Parry Clarke, Nicola Forshaw, April Takahashi, Nicole Whale, and David McCaffrey provided valuable assistance in the field, and many stimulating discussions. Louise Barrett provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. This project is funded by NSERC (Canada), NRF (South Africa), and UNISA grants to L. Barrett, S.P. Henzi, and L. Brown.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra McDougall.

About this article

Cite this article

McDougall, P. Is passive observation of habituated animals truly passive?. J Ethol 30, 219–223 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0313-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0313-x

Keywords

Navigation