Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of adsorbents for treatment of leachate: batch studies of simultaneous adsorption of heavy metals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The simultaneous adsorption of copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) ions from spiked deionized water and spiked leachate onto natural materials (peat A and B), by-product or waste materials (carbon-containing ash, paper pellets, pine bark, and semi-coke), and synthetic materials (based on urea-formaldehyde resins, called blue and red adsorbents) or mixtures thereof was investigated. The adsorbents that gave the highest metal removal efficiencies were peat A, a mixture of peat B and carbon-containing ash, and a mixture of peat A and blue. At an initial concentration of 5 mg/l for each metal, the removal of each species of metal ion from spiked water and spiked leachate solutions was very good (>90%) and good (>75%), respectively. When the initial concentration of each metal in the solutions was twenty times higher (100 mg/l), there was a noticeable decrease in the removal efficiency of Cu2+, Cd2+, and Ni2+, but not of Pb2+. Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacities, qm, on peat A were found to be 0.57, 0.37, and 0.36 mmol/g for Pb2+, Cd2+, and Ni2+, respectively. The order of metal adsorption capacity on peat A was the same in the case of competitive multimetal adsorption conditions as it was for single-element adsorption, namely Pb2+ > Cd2+ ≥ Ni2+. The results show that peat alone (an inexpensive adsorbent) is a good adsorbent for heavy metal ions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM, Adrian DA (1999) A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33: 2469–2479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hawari AH, Mulligan CN (2006) Biosorption of lead (II), cadmium (II), copper (II) and nickel (II) by anaerobic granular biomass. Biores Technol 97:692–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ong L, Swanson VE (1966) Adsorption of copper by peat, lignite and bituminous coal. Econ Geol 61:1214–1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sõukand Ü, Tungel R, Tenno T (1996) Comparison of heavy metals adsorption properties on natural and granulated peat on the example of cadmium. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Chem 45:123–129

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sõukand Ü, Kängsepp P, Sõukand R, Tenno T (2003) Simultaneous adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+ and Pb2+ on peat. In: Hogland W, Kuznetsova N (eds) Proceedings of Kalmar Eco-tech’03. Kalmar University, Kalmar, pp 269–277

    Google Scholar 

  6. Viraraghavan T, Rao GAK (1992) Adsorption of cadmium and chromium from wastewater by peat. In: Proceedings of the 47th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference. Lewis, Chelsea, pp 678–688

    Google Scholar 

  7. Viraraghavan T, Dronamraja MM (1993) Removal of copper, nickel and zinc from wastewater by adsorption using peat. J Environ Sci Health A 28:1261–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McKay G, Porter JF (1997) Equilibrium parameters for the sorption of copper, cadmium and zinc ions onto peat. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 69:309–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aldrich C, Feng D (2000) Removal of heavy metals from wastewater effluents by biosorptive flotation. Miner Eng 13:1129–1138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davila JS, Matos CM, Calcavanti MR (1992) Heavy-metals removal from waste-water using activated peat. Water Sci Technol 26:2309–2312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang J-S, Chen C-C (1998) Quantitative analysis and equilibrium models of selective adsorption in multimetal systems using a bacterial biosorbent. Sep Sci Technol 33:611–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao B, Thomas KM (2004) Competitive adsorption of aqueous metal ions on an oxidized nanoporous activated carbon. Langmuir 20:4566–4578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Juang R-S, Shao H-J (2002) Effect of pH on competitive adsorption of Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) from water onto chitosan beads. Adsorption 8:71–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trivedi P, Axe L, Dyer J (2001) Adsorption of metal ions onto goethite: single-adsorbate and competitive systems. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 191:107–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fontes MPF, Gomes PC (2003) Simultaneous competitive adsorption of heavy metals by mineral matrix of tropical soils. Appl Geochem 18:795–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang S-Y, Lee J-U, Moon S-H, Kim K-W (2004) Competitive adsorption characteristics of Co2+, Ni2+ and Cr3+ by IRN-77 cation exchange resin in synthesized wastewater. Chemosphere 56: 141–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Abu Al-Rub FA, Kandah M, Al-Dabaybeh N (2003) Competitive adsorption of nickel and cadmium on sheep manure wastes: experimental and prediction studies. Sep Sci Technol 38:483–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sposito G (1984) The surface chemistry of soils. Inorganic and organic solute adsorption in soils. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brown PA, Gill SA, Allen SJ (2000) Metal removal from wastewater using peat. Water Res 34:3907–3916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulthess CP, Dey DK (1996) Estimation of Langmuir constants using linear and nonlinear least-squares regression analyses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:433–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kängsepp P, Mathiasson L (2009) Performance of a full-scale biofilter with peat and ash as a medium for treating industrial landfill leachate: a 3-year study of pollutant removal efficiency. Waste Manage Res 27:147–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Svensson BM, Mathiasson L, Mårtensson L, Bergström S (2005) Artemia salina as test organism for assessment of acute toxicity of leachate water from landfills. Environ Monit Assess 102:309–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fowle DA, Fein JB (1999) Competitive adsorption of metal cations onto two gram-positive bacteria: testing the chemical equilibrium model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:3059–3067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolf A, Bunzl K, Dietl F, Schmidt WF (1977) Effect of Ca2+ ions on the absorption of Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ by humic substances. Chemosphere 5:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McNevin D, Barford J (2001) Inter-relationship between adsorption and pH in peat biofilters in the context of a cation-exchange mechanism. Water Res 35:736–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhipei Z, Junlu Y, Zengnui W, Piya C (1984) A preliminary study of the removal of Pb++, Cd++, Zn++, Ni++ and Cr6+ from wastewater with several Chinese peats. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Peat Congress. Irish National Peat Committee/The International Peat Society, Dublin, pp 147–152

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pille Kängsepp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sõukand, Ü., Kängsepp, P., Kakum, R. et al. Selection of adsorbents for treatment of leachate: batch studies of simultaneous adsorption of heavy metals. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 12, 57–65 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-009-0270-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-009-0270-4

Key words

Navigation