Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Sphagnum peat moss and crushed mollusk shells in fixed-bed columns for the treatment of synthetic landfill leachate

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A laboratory bench-scale fixed-bed column study operated as a down-flow configuration was conducted to evaluate Sphagnum peat moss and crushed mollusk shells as natural low-cost adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals from aerated and unaerated synthetic landfill leachate. Columns were packed with 15 cm of prepared peat moss, or 15 cm adsorbent mixtures made up of peat moss and crushed mollusk shells (4.0–4.75 mm) from Lake Ontario at different bed depth ratios. Peat was found to have the best adsorption capacities in columns treating aerated synthetic leachate for cadmium and nickel with 78.6% and 83.8% removal efficiencies, respectively. The removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total nitrogen from the synthetic leachate was also monitored to evaluate the potential effects of biological activity on heavy metal adsorption. Columns receiving unaerated raw synthetic leachates did not show any significant removal of COD and total nitrogen, whereas some reduction in COD and total nitrogen was noted in the columns treating aerated synthetic landfill leachate. The results suggested that biological activity and biofilm growth could positively contribute to heavy metal retention within the fixed-media biosorption columns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baun DL, Christensen TH (2003) Speciation of heavy metals in landfill leachate: a review. Waste Manag Res 22:2–23

    Google Scholar 

  2. Papageorgiou SK, Katsaros FK, Kouvelos EP, Nolan JW, Herve LD, Kanellopoulos NK (2006) Heavy metal sorption by calcium alginate beads from Laminaria digitata. J Hazard Mater B137: 1765–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Çeçen F, Gürsoy G (2001) Biosorption of heavy metals from landfill leachate onto activated sludge. J Environ Sci Health A36: 987–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Enzminger JD, Robertson D, Ahlert RC, Kosson DS (1987) Treatment of landfill leachates. J Hazard Mater 14:83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aziz HA, Yusoff MS, Adlan MN, Adnan NH, Alias S (2004) Physico-chemical removal of iron from semi-aerobic landfill leachate by limestone filter. Waste Manag 24:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kargi F, Pamukoglu MY (2004) Adsorbent supplemented biological treatment of pre-treated landfill leachate by fed-batch operation. Bioresour Technol 94:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uygur A, Kargi F (2004) Biological nutrient removal from pretreatment landfill leachate in a sequencing batch reactor. J Environ Manag 71:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kietlińska A, Renman G (2005) An evaluation of reactive filter media for treating landfill leachate. Chemosphere 61:933–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurniawan TA, Lo W, Chan GY (2006) Physico-chemical treatments for removal of recalcitrant contaminants from landfill leachate. J Hazard Mater B 129:80–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aly AS, Jeon BD, Park YH (1997) Preparation and evaluation of the chitin derivatives for wastewater treatments. Journal of Applied Polymer Sicence 65(10):1939–1946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benguella B, Benaissa H (2002) Cadmium removal from aqueous solutions by chitin: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Water Res 36:2436–2474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rae IB, Gibb SW (2003) Removal of metals from aqueous solutions using natural chitinous materials. Water Sci Technol 47:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou D, Zhang L, Zhou J, Guo S (2004) Cellulose/chitin beads for adsorption of heavy metals in aqueous solution. Water Res 38:2643–2650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saiano F, Ciofalo M, Cacciola S, Ramirez S (2005) Metal ion adsorption by Phomopsis sp. Biomaterial in laboratory experiments and real wastewater treatments. Water Res 39:2273–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baran A, Bicak E, Baysal S, Onal S (2006) Comparative studies on the adsorption of Cr (VI) ions onto various sorbents. Bioresour Technol 98:661–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cochrane EL, Lu S, Gibb SW, Villaescusa I (2006) A comparison of low-cost biosorbents and commercial sorbents for the removal of copper from aqueous media. J Hazard Mater B 137:198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee M, Hong K, Kajiuchi T, Yang J (2004) Determination of the efficiency and removal mechanism of cobalt by crab shell particles. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 79:1388–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McLellan JK, Rock CA (1988) Pretreating landfill leachate with peat to remove metals. Water Air Soil Poll 37:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Allen SJ, Whitten LJ, Murray M, Duggan O (1997) The adsorption of pollutants by peat, lignite and activated chars. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 68:442–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ringqvist L, Holmgren A, Öborn I (2001) Poorly humified peat as an adsorbent for metals in wastewater. Water Res 36:2394–2404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heavy M (2003) Low-cost treatment of landfill leachate using peat. Waste Manag 23:447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Champagne P, Van Geel P, Parker W (2005) Development of a combined passive system for the reduction of metals and sulphate in acid mine drainage. Mine Water Environ 24:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qin F, Wen B, Shan X, Xie Y, Liu T, Zhang S, Khan SU (2006) Mechanisms of competitive adsorption of Pb, Cu, and Cd on peat. Environ Poll 144:669–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Champagne P, Van Geel P, Parker W (2008) Impact of constituent loading and temperature on the mitigation of AMD in peat biofilters. Mine Water Environ 27(4):225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulmanu M, Maranon E, Fernandez Y, Casterillon L, Anger I, Dumitriu D (2003) Removal of copper and cadmium ions from diluted aqueous solutions by low-cost and waste material adsorbents. Water Air Soil Poll 142:357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi SB, Yun Y (2006) Biosorption of cadmium by various types of dried sludge: an equilibrium study and investigation of mechanisms. J Hazard Mater B138:378–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cetin S, Pehlivan E (2007) The use of fly ash as a low-cost, environmentally friendly alternative to activated carbon for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Colloid Surface A 298:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown PA, Gill SA, Allen SJ (2000) Review paper: metal removal from wastewater using peat. Water Res 34:3907–3916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hrapovic L, Rowe RK (2002) Intrinsic degradation of volatile fatty acids in laboratory-compacted clayey soil. J Contam Hydrol 58:221–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. VanGulck JF, Rowe RK (2004) Evolution of clog formation with time in columns permeated with synthetic landfill leachate. J Contam Hydrol 75:115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li C, Champagne P (2009) Comparative fixed-bed column study on the adsorption of cadmium (II) and nickel (II) ions in binary metal aqueous solutions using peat and crushed mollusk shells. J Environ Sci Technol (Submitted January 10, 2009; Ref. ES-2008-03641Q)

  32. Chenxi L, Champagne P (2009) Fxied-bed column study for the adsorption of cadmium (II) and nickel (II) ions in aqueous solution using peat and mollusk shells. Journal of Hazardous Material 171: 872–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kylefors K, Ecke H, Lagerkvist A (2003) Accuracy of COD test for landfill leachates. Water Air Soil Poll 146:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Morelli J (1992) Leachate recirculation: design and operation considerations. MSW Manage 2(3):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  35. Couillard D (1994) Review: the use of peat in wastewater treatment. Water Resour 28:1261–1274

    Google Scholar 

  36. Champagne P, Khalekuzzaman M (2006) A sequential aerated peat biofilter system for the treatment of landfill leachate. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Evolution, Monitoring, Simulation, Management and Remediation of the Geological Environment and Landscape. IASTED June 6–8, Rhodes, Greece, pp 125–134

  37. Liehr SK, Chen H, Lin S (1994) Metals removal by algal biofilms. Water Sci Technol 30:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Champagne P (2001) A combined passive system for the treatment of acid mine drainage. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Scott JA, Karanjkar AM, Rowe DL (1995) Biofilm-covered granular activated carbon for decontamination of streams containing heavy metals and organic chemicals. Min Eng 8:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cloirec PL, Andres Y, Faur-Brasquet C, Gerente C (2003) Engineering biofilms for heavy metal ion removal. Environ Sci Bio-Technol 2:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Birch L, Baschofen R (1990) Complexing agents from microorganisms. Experientia 46:827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. APHA. (1995) Standard Methods. 19th Edition, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering and Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen’s University, 58 University Avenue, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada

    Pascale Champagne & Chenxi Li

Authors
  1. Pascale Champagne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chenxi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascale Champagne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Champagne, P., Li, C. Use of Sphagnum peat moss and crushed mollusk shells in fixed-bed columns for the treatment of synthetic landfill leachate. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 11, 339–347 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-009-0262-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-009-0262-4

Key words

Search

Navigation