Skip to main content
Log in

Ampicillin/sulbactam for children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Childhood community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, but studies on the treatment of children hospitalized with CAP are limited. Although ampicillin/sulbactam is frequently used to treat the pediatric population there are very limited data about the effect of the parenteral form for childhood CAP. Hence, a retrospective study was conducted to assess clinical response to empirical parenteral ampicillin/sulbactam among children hospitalized with CAP. A total of 501 children with presumed bacterial etiology and treated with intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam were included in the study. Treatment was defined as failure if the initial ampicillin/sulbactam therapy was changed because of no clinical improvement 72 h or more after its use or clinical worsening at any time. Thirty-one (6.2%) children needed treatment change whereas 470 (93.8%) were treated successfully with ampicillin/sulbactam. In multivariate analysis, male gender [OR (95%CI): 3.32 (1.37–8.04), p = 0.008], CRP levels [OR (95%CI) 1.04 (1.01–1.08), p = 0.024], and existence of pleural effusion [OR (95%CI) 5.74 (2.17–15.15), p = 0.0001] were found to be significantly associated with treatment failure for the whole study group. For the subgroup of children between 3 and 60 months of age; respiratory rate [OR (95%CI) 1.06 (1.02–1.10), p = 0.0006] was also found to be an additional risk factor. In conclusion, this is the largest study showing that empiric parenteral ampicillin/sulbactam is effective, safe, and well tolerated for treatment of children hospitalized with CAP. However, pleural effusion was found to be the main factor associated with treatment failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wardlaw T, Salama P, Johansson EW, Mason E. Pneumonia: the leading killer of children. Lancet. 2006;368:1048–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lode HM. Rational antibiotic therapy and the position of ampicillin/sulbactam. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32:10–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oliveira MS, Prado GV, Costa SF, Grinbaum RS, Levin AS. Ampicillin/sulbactam compared with polymyxins for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter spp. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:1369–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:27–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, Huchon G, Ieven M, Ortqvist A, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:1138–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jokinen C, Heiskanen L, Juvonen H, Kallinen S, Karkola K, Korppi M, et al. Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in the population of four municipalities in eastern Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:977–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. MacIntyre CR, McIntyre PB, Cagney M. Community-based estimates of incidence and risk factors for childhood pneumonia in Western Sydney. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;131:1091–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raillard P, Kose G, Ozkan H, Hasanoglu A, Firat S, Feiner C. Low-dose sultamicillin oral suspension in the treatment of mild to moderate paediatric infections in Turkey. J Int Med Res. 1992;20:12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Biolcati AH. An open comparative study of the efficacy and safety of sultamicillin versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. J Int Med Res. 1992;20:31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. López EL, Rivas NA. Clinical use of sultamicillin (ampicillin/sulbactam) in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17(3 Suppl):12–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daniscovicova-Nogeova A, Galova K, Sufliarska S, Krizan S, Kukova Z, Krupova I. Cefuroxime axetil versus ampicillin-sulbactam in therapy of community acquired pneumonia: a randomized multicenter study in 149 children. Antiinfect Drugs Chemother. 1999;16:219–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Airede AI, Jalo I, Weerasinghe HD, Bello M, Adeyemi. Observations on oral Sultamicillin/Unasyn CP-45 899 therapy of neonatal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1997;8:103–7.

  13. Lode H. Role of sultamicillin and ampicillin/sulbactam in the treatment of upper and lower bacterial respiratory tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18:199–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alpuche-Aranda C, Espinosa LE, Santos JI. Sulbactam/ampicillin vs. ceforoxime: a comparative clinical evaluation in the treatment of serious infections in children. Rev Espan Quimioterapia. 1992;5:65–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jauregui L, Minns P, Hageage G. A comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefotaxime in the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized patients. J Chemother. 1995;7:153–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwigon CD, Gabor M, Hartmann J, Mössinger R, Oberling M, Schubert U, et al. Which antibiotic is better for the treatment of infections of the lower respiratory tract? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1996;6(Suppl):73–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwigon CD, Cuhorst R, Gabor M, Zinndorf J, Springsklee M. Comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and cefuroxime in infections of the lower respiratory tract: results of a prospective, randomized and comparative study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1996;6(Suppl):67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel A, Mamtani M, Hibberd PL, Tuan TA, Jeena P, Chisaka N, et al. Value of chest radiography in predicting treatment response in children aged 3–59 months with severe pneumonia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:1320–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cardoso MR, Nascimento-Carvalho CM, Ferrero F, Berezin EN, Ruvinsky R, Camargos PA, CARIBE Group, et al. Penicillin-resistant pneumococcus and risk of treatment failure in pneumonia. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Principi N, Esposito S. Management of severe community-acquired pneumonia of children in developing and developed countries. Thorax. 2010.

  21. Tan TQ, Mason EO Jr, Wald ER, Barson WJ, Schutze GE, Bradley JS, et al. Clinical characteristics of children with complicated pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatrics. 2002;110:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bishai W. The in vivo–in vitro paradox in pneumococcal respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:433–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wexler ID, Knoll S, Picard E, Villa Y, Shoseyov D, Engelhard D, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia in a pediatric population. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41:726–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Korppi M. Mixed microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in children. APMIS. 2002;110:515–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Korppi M, Don M, Valent F, Canciani M. The value of clinical features in differentiating between viral, pneumococcal and atypical bacterial pneumonia in children. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:943–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Don M, Valent F, Korppi M, Canciani M. Differentiation of bacterial and viral community-acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatr Int. 2009;51:91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dajani A. Use of ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin in pediatric infections: a re-evaluation. J Int Med Res. 2001;29:257–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Korppi M. Community-acquired pneumonia in children: issues in optimizing antibacterial treatment. Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5:821–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Atkinson M, Lakhanpaul M, Smyth A, Vyas H, Weston V, Sithole J, et al. Comparison of oral amoxicillin and intravenous benzyl penicillin for community acquired pneumonia in children (PIVOT trial): a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2007;62:1102–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Fatma Nur Baran Aksakal for her help and support in statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anıl Tapısız.

About this article

Cite this article

Tapısız, A., Özdemir, H., Çiftçi, E. et al. Ampicillin/sulbactam for children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Chemother 17, 504–509 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0208-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0208-3

Keywords

Navigation