Abstract
Childhood community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, but studies on the treatment of children hospitalized with CAP are limited. Although ampicillin/sulbactam is frequently used to treat the pediatric population there are very limited data about the effect of the parenteral form for childhood CAP. Hence, a retrospective study was conducted to assess clinical response to empirical parenteral ampicillin/sulbactam among children hospitalized with CAP. A total of 501 children with presumed bacterial etiology and treated with intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam were included in the study. Treatment was defined as failure if the initial ampicillin/sulbactam therapy was changed because of no clinical improvement 72 h or more after its use or clinical worsening at any time. Thirty-one (6.2%) children needed treatment change whereas 470 (93.8%) were treated successfully with ampicillin/sulbactam. In multivariate analysis, male gender [OR (95%CI): 3.32 (1.37–8.04), p = 0.008], CRP levels [OR (95%CI) 1.04 (1.01–1.08), p = 0.024], and existence of pleural effusion [OR (95%CI) 5.74 (2.17–15.15), p = 0.0001] were found to be significantly associated with treatment failure for the whole study group. For the subgroup of children between 3 and 60 months of age; respiratory rate [OR (95%CI) 1.06 (1.02–1.10), p = 0.0006] was also found to be an additional risk factor. In conclusion, this is the largest study showing that empiric parenteral ampicillin/sulbactam is effective, safe, and well tolerated for treatment of children hospitalized with CAP. However, pleural effusion was found to be the main factor associated with treatment failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wardlaw T, Salama P, Johansson EW, Mason E. Pneumonia: the leading killer of children. Lancet. 2006;368:1048–50.
Lode HM. Rational antibiotic therapy and the position of ampicillin/sulbactam. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32:10–28.
Oliveira MS, Prado GV, Costa SF, Grinbaum RS, Levin AS. Ampicillin/sulbactam compared with polymyxins for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter spp. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:1369–75.
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:27–72.
Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, Huchon G, Ieven M, Ortqvist A, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:1138–80.
Jokinen C, Heiskanen L, Juvonen H, Kallinen S, Karkola K, Korppi M, et al. Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in the population of four municipalities in eastern Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:977–88.
MacIntyre CR, McIntyre PB, Cagney M. Community-based estimates of incidence and risk factors for childhood pneumonia in Western Sydney. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;131:1091–6.
Raillard P, Kose G, Ozkan H, Hasanoglu A, Firat S, Feiner C. Low-dose sultamicillin oral suspension in the treatment of mild to moderate paediatric infections in Turkey. J Int Med Res. 1992;20:12–23.
Biolcati AH. An open comparative study of the efficacy and safety of sultamicillin versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. J Int Med Res. 1992;20:31–43.
López EL, Rivas NA. Clinical use of sultamicillin (ampicillin/sulbactam) in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17(3 Suppl):12–4.
Daniscovicova-Nogeova A, Galova K, Sufliarska S, Krizan S, Kukova Z, Krupova I. Cefuroxime axetil versus ampicillin-sulbactam in therapy of community acquired pneumonia: a randomized multicenter study in 149 children. Antiinfect Drugs Chemother. 1999;16:219–20.
Airede AI, Jalo I, Weerasinghe HD, Bello M, Adeyemi. Observations on oral Sultamicillin/Unasyn CP-45 899 therapy of neonatal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1997;8:103–7.
Lode H. Role of sultamicillin and ampicillin/sulbactam in the treatment of upper and lower bacterial respiratory tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18:199–209.
Alpuche-Aranda C, Espinosa LE, Santos JI. Sulbactam/ampicillin vs. ceforoxime: a comparative clinical evaluation in the treatment of serious infections in children. Rev Espan Quimioterapia. 1992;5:65–8.
Jauregui L, Minns P, Hageage G. A comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefotaxime in the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized patients. J Chemother. 1995;7:153–6.
Schwigon CD, Gabor M, Hartmann J, Mössinger R, Oberling M, Schubert U, et al. Which antibiotic is better for the treatment of infections of the lower respiratory tract? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1996;6(Suppl):73–7.
Schwigon CD, Cuhorst R, Gabor M, Zinndorf J, Springsklee M. Comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and cefuroxime in infections of the lower respiratory tract: results of a prospective, randomized and comparative study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1996;6(Suppl):67–72.
Patel A, Mamtani M, Hibberd PL, Tuan TA, Jeena P, Chisaka N, et al. Value of chest radiography in predicting treatment response in children aged 3–59 months with severe pneumonia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:1320–6.
Cardoso MR, Nascimento-Carvalho CM, Ferrero F, Berezin EN, Ruvinsky R, Camargos PA, CARIBE Group, et al. Penicillin-resistant pneumococcus and risk of treatment failure in pneumonia. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:221–5.
Principi N, Esposito S. Management of severe community-acquired pneumonia of children in developing and developed countries. Thorax. 2010.
Tan TQ, Mason EO Jr, Wald ER, Barson WJ, Schutze GE, Bradley JS, et al. Clinical characteristics of children with complicated pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatrics. 2002;110:1–6.
Bishai W. The in vivo–in vitro paradox in pneumococcal respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:433–6.
Wexler ID, Knoll S, Picard E, Villa Y, Shoseyov D, Engelhard D, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia in a pediatric population. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41:726–34.
Korppi M. Mixed microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in children. APMIS. 2002;110:515–22.
Korppi M, Don M, Valent F, Canciani M. The value of clinical features in differentiating between viral, pneumococcal and atypical bacterial pneumonia in children. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:943–7.
Don M, Valent F, Korppi M, Canciani M. Differentiation of bacterial and viral community-acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatr Int. 2009;51:91–6.
Dajani A. Use of ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin in pediatric infections: a re-evaluation. J Int Med Res. 2001;29:257–69.
Korppi M. Community-acquired pneumonia in children: issues in optimizing antibacterial treatment. Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5:821–32.
Atkinson M, Lakhanpaul M, Smyth A, Vyas H, Weston V, Sithole J, et al. Comparison of oral amoxicillin and intravenous benzyl penicillin for community acquired pneumonia in children (PIVOT trial): a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2007;62:1102–6.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Fatma Nur Baran Aksakal for her help and support in statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Tapısız, A., Özdemir, H., Çiftçi, E. et al. Ampicillin/sulbactam for children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Chemother 17, 504–509 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0208-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0208-3