Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic tests for influenza and other respiratory viruses: determining performance specifications based on clinical setting

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The lack of sensitivity of rapid immunoassays in detecting the novel 2009 H1N1 influenza virus infection has led to recommendations on influenza diagnostic testing for clinicians treating patients as well as advising clinicians on testing decisions. Studies have also shown that rapid immunoassays for seasonal influenza virus show considerable variability in performance characteristics, based on age of patient, prevalence of disease, course of infection, and the quality of the kit used. While public health authorities are currently focused on influenza virus diagnostics, a lack of sensitivity of rapid immunoassays for other viral respiratory pathogens has been widely reported, such as the very limited value of rapid immunoassays for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus in adults. In light of the lack of sensitivity of diagnostic tests for suspected 2009 H1N1 influenza virus infection, as well as their variable performance characteristics for seasonal influenza virus, a number of recommendations have been made by public health authorities advising clinicians on the need for clinical judgment as an important part of testing and treatment decisions as well as reliance on local epidemiologic and surveillance data. With the availability of new molecular methodologies that are user-friendly and allow the front-line physician as well as hospital infection control programs to significantly improve respiratory viral diagnostics, there is a need to carefully determine the most optimal diagnostic testing methodology based on the clinical setting. This review will describe the historical, current, and changing dynamics of respiratory virus infection diagnostics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahony JB. Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:716–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Epsy MJ, Smith TE, Harmon MW, Kendal AP. Rapid detection of influenza virus by shell vial assay with monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:677–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Landry ML, Hsiung GD. Primary isolation of viruses. In: Spector S, Hodinka RL, Young SA, editors. Clinical virology manual. Washington: ASM; 2000, p. 27–29.

  4. Atmar R. Influenza viruses. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen J, Landry ML, Pfaller MA, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington: ASM; 2007, p. 1340–1351.

  5. Tang YW, Crowe JE. Respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen J, Landry ML, Pfaller MA, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington: ASM; 2007, p. 1361–1377.

  6. Ginocchio CC, Lotlikar M, Falk L, Arora S, Kowerska M, Bornfreund M, et al. Clinical performance of the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A+B Test compared to R-Mix culture, DFA and BinaxNOW Influenza A&B Test. J Clin Virol. 2009;45:146–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JS, Kim SH, Bae SY, Lim CS, Kim YK, Lee KN, et al. Enhanced detection of respiratory viruses using cryopreserved R-Mix ReadyCells. J Clin Virol. 2008;42:264–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Landry ML, Ferguson D. SimulFluor respiratory screen for rapid detection of multiple respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by immunofluorescence staining. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:708–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vinh DC, Newby D, Charest H, McDonald J. Evaluation of a commercial direct fluorescent-antibody assay for human metapneumovirus in respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1840–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Uyeki TM, Prasad R, Vukotich C, Stebbins S, Rinaldo CR, et al. Low sensitivity of rapid diagnostic test for influenza. CID. 2009;48:e89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruef C. Diagnosing influenza—clinical assessment and/or rapid antigen testing? Infection. 2007;35:49–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurt AC, Alexander R, Hibbert J, Deed N, Barr IG. Performance of six influenza rapid tests in detecting human influenza in clinical specimens. J Clin Virol. 2007;39:132–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan KH, Lam SY, Puthavathana P, Nguyen TD, Long HT, et al. Comparative analytical sensitivities of six rapid influenza A antigen detection test kits for detection of influenza A subtypes H1N1, H3N2 and H5N1. J Clin Virol. 2007;38:169–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cazacu AC, Demmler GJ, Neuman MA, Forbes BA, Chung S, Greer J, et al. Comparison of a new lateral-flow chromatographic membrane immunoassay to viral culture for rapid detection and differentiation of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3661–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hara M, Takao S, Fukuda S, Shimazu Y, Miyazaki K. Evaluation of three immunochromatographic kits for rapid detection of influenza virus A and B. Lab Med. 2008;39:603–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehlmann M, Bonner AB, Williams JV, Dankbar DM, Moor CL, Kuchta RD, et al. Comparison of the MChip to viral culture, reverse transcription-PCR, and the quick vue influenza A+B test for the rapid diagnosis of influenza. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1234–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ginocchio CC, Zhang F, Manji R, Arora S, Bornfreund M, Falk L, et al. Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak. J Clin Virol. 2009;45:191–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. CDC. Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus—United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:826–829.

  19. Henrickson KJ, Hall CB. Diagnostic assays for respiratory syncytial virus disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:S36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Falsey AR, Walsh EE. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;42:371–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Selvarangan R, Abel D, Hamilton M. Comparison of BD Directigen EZ RSV and Binax NOW RSV tests for rapid detection of respiratory syncytial virus from nasopharyngeal aspirates in a pediatric population. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;62:157–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aslanzadeh J, Zheng X, Li H, Tetreault J, Ratkiewicz I, Meng S, et al. Prospective evaluation of rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1682–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Casiano-Colon AE, Hulbert B, Mayer TK, Walsh EE, Falsey AR. Lack of sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infections in adults. J Clin Virol. 2003;28:169–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohm-Smith MJ, Nassos PS, Haller BL. Evaluation of the Binax NOW 2004 BD Directigen, and BD Directigen EZ assays for detection of respiratory syncytial virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2996–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin MR, Walker FJ, Iwane MK, Weinburg GA, Staat MA, Erdman DD. Epidemiology of respiratory infections in young children: insights from the new vaccine surveillance network. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23:S188–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiu CY, Rouskin S, Koshy A, Urisman A, Fischer K, Yagi S, et al. Microarray detection of human parainfluenzavirus 4 infection associated with respiratory failure in an immunocompetent adult. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:71–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsuzaki Y, Takashita E, Okamoto M, Mizuta K, Itagaki T, Katsushima F, et al. Evaluation of a new rapid antigen test using immunochromatography for detection of human metapneumvirus in comparison with real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:2981–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kikuta H, Sakata C, Gamo R, Ishizaka A, Koga Y, Konno M, et al. Comparison of a lateral-flow immunochromatography assay with real-time reverse transcription-PCR for detection of human metapneumovirus. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;46:928–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Bolvin G. Detection of human metapneumovirus antigens in nasopharyngeal aspirates using an enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Virol. 2009;44:88–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. LeGoff J, Kara R, Moulin F, Si-Mohamed A, Krivine A, Belec L, et al. Evaluation of the one-step multiplex real-time reverse-transcription-PCR ProFlu-1 assay for detection of influenza A and influenza B viruses and respiratory syncytial viruses in children. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:789–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nolte FS, Marshall DJ, Rasberry C, Schievelbein S, Banks GG, Storch GA, et al. MultiCode-PLx system for multiplexed detection of seventeen respiratory viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2779–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Takahashi H, Patterson BK. Evaluation of the NanoChip 400 for detection of influenza A and B, respiratory syncytial, and parainfluenza viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1724–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roche Laboratories, Inc. Tamiflu safety information. http://www.tamiflu.com/isi.aspx. Last accessed 5 Feb 2010.

  34. Lefferts JA, et al. Evaluation of the Nanosphere Verigene® System and the Verigene®F5/F2/MTHFR Nucleic Acid Tests. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;87:105–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jannetto, PJ, Vaughan K, Prokhorova A, Brener D, Lonosky PM, et al. Nanoparticle probes for detection and discrimination of influenza A/B and RSV A/B in respiratory specimens (Abstract M10 2009). In: 25th Clinical Virology Symp, Daytona Beach, FL, USA, 19–22 April 2009.

  36. Ledeboer, N. Real-time random access respiratory virus testing (presentation). In: 109th American Soc Microbiology General Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 17–21 May 2009.

  37. Sails AD, Saunders D, Airs S, Roberts D, Eltringham G, Magee JG. Evaluation of the cepheid respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus A/B real-time PCR analyte specific reagent. J Virol Methods. 2009;156:124–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. East-West Diagnostics/Theranostics, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Hiroshi Takahashi

  2. Department of Clinical Laboratories, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan

    Yoshihito Otsuka

  3. Clinical Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, 3375 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA

    Bruce K. Patterson

  4. Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographical Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

    Bruce K. Patterson

Authors
  1. Hiroshi Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshihito Otsuka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruce K. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce K. Patterson.

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, H., Otsuka, Y. & Patterson, B.K. Diagnostic tests for influenza and other respiratory viruses: determining performance specifications based on clinical setting. J Infect Chemother 16, 155–161 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-010-0035-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-010-0035-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation