Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fecobionics assessment of the effect of position on defecatory efficacy in normal subjects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Defecation is a complex process and up to 25% of the population suffer from symptoms of defecatory dysfunction. For functional testing, diagnostics, and therapy of anorectal disorders, it is important to know the optimal defecation position. is The aim of this study was to evaluate defecation pressure patterns in side lying, seated and squatting defecation positions in normal subjects using a simulated stool device called Fecobionics.

Methods

The Fecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design conducted from May 29 to December 9 2019. Subjects were invited to participate in the study through advertisement at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The Fecobionics device consisted of a core containing pressure sensors at the front (caudal end) and rear (cranial end) and a polyester-urethane bag spanning most of the core length which also contained sensors. The Fecobionics bag was distended to 50 ml in the rectum of normal subjects (no present and past symptoms of defecatory disorders, no prior abdominal surgery, medication or chronic diseases). Studies were done in side lying (left lateral recumbent position), seated (hip flexed 90°) and squatting position (hip flexed 25°). Pressure endpoints including the rear-front pressure diagram and defecation indices were compared between positions.

Results

Twelve subjects (6 females/6 males, mean age 26.3 ± 2.6 [19.0–48.0] years) were included and underwent the planned procedures. The resting anal pressure for side lying and seated positions were 33.1 ± 4.1 cmH2O and 37.1 ± 4.0 cmH2O (p > 0.3). The anal squeeze pressure for side lying and seated positions were 98.4 ± 6.9 cmH2O and 142.3 ± 16.4 cmH2O (p < 0.05). The expulsion duration for the side lying, seated and squatting positions were 108.9 ± 8.3 s, 15.0 ± 2.1 s and 16.1 ± 2.9 s, respectively (p < 0.01 between lying and the two other positions). The maximum evacuation pressure for seated and squatting were 130.1 ± 12.4 cmH2O and 134.0 ± 11.1 cmH2O (p > 0.5). Rear-front pressure diagrams and distensibility indices demonstrated distinct differences in pressure patterns between the side lying position group and the other positions.

Conclusions

The delay in expelling the Fecobionics device in the lying position was associated with dyssynergic pressure patterns on the device. Quantitative differences were not found between the seated and squatting position.

Trial Registration http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03317938.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gregersen H, Christensen J (2016) Clinical mechanics in the gut: an introduction. Bentham Science Publishers, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, Felt-Bersma R, Knowles C, Malcolm A, Wald A (2016) Anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Suares NC, Ford AC (2011) Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 106(9):1582–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao SS, Kavlock R, Rao S (2006) Influence of body position and stool characteristics on defecation in humans. Am J Gastroenterol 101(12):2790–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu GJ, Xu F, Lin L, Pasricha PJ, Chen JDZ (2017) Anorectal manometry: should it be performed in a seated position? Neurogastroenterol Motil 29:5. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma M, Muthyala A, Feuerhak K, Puthanmadhom Narayanan S, Bailey KR, Bharucha AE (2020) Improving the utility of high-resolution manometry for the diagnosis of defecatory disorders in women with chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 32(10):e13910. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Modi RM, Hinton A, Pinkhas D, Groce R, Meyer MM, Balasubramanian G, Levine E, Stanich PP (2019) Implementation of a defecation posture modification device: impact on bowel movement patterns in healthy subjects. J Clin Gastroenterol 53(3):216–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakakibara R, Tsunoyama K, Hosoi H, Takahashi O, Sugiyama M, Kishi M, Ogawa E, Terada H, Uchiyama T, Yamanishi T (2010) Influence of body position on defecation in humans. LUTS 2(1):16–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sikirov D (2003) Comparison of straining during defecation in three positions: results and implications for human health. Dig Dis Sci 48(7):1201–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rad S (2002) Impact of ethnic habits on defecographic measurements. Arch Iranian Med 5(2):115–117

    Google Scholar 

  11. Takano S, Sands DR (2016) Influence of body posture on defecation: a prospective study of “The Thinker” position. Tech Coloproctol 20(2):117–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1402-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gregersen H, Krogh K, Liao D (2018) Fecobionics: integrating anorectal function measurements. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(6):981–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.09.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun D, Huang Z, Zhuang Z, Ma Z, Man LK, Liao D, Gregersen H (2019) Fecobionics: a novel bionics device for studying defecation. Ann Biomed Eng 47(2):576–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-02149-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gregersen H, Lo KM (2018) What is the future of impedance planimetry in gastroenterology? J Neurogastroenterol Motil 24(2):166–181. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm18013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregersen H, Chen SC, Leung WW, Wong C, Mak T, Ng S, Futaba K (2019) Novel fecobionics defecatory function testing. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 10(12):e00108. https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liao D, Chen SC, Lo KM, Zhao J, Futaba K, Gregersen H (2019) Theoretical tools to analyze anorectal mechanophysiological data generated by the fecobionics device. J Biomech Eng 141:9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen S-C, Futaba K, Leung WW, Wong C, Mak T, Ng S, Gregersen H (2020) Simulated stool for assessment of anorectal physiology. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 319(4):G462–G468. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00242.2020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gregersen H, Chen SC, Leung WW, Wong C, Mak T, Ng S, Futaba K (2020) Fecobionics characterization of patients with fecal incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Palit S, Thin N, Knowles CH, Lunniss PJ, Bharucha AE, Scott SM (2016) Diagnostic disagreement between tests of evacuatory function: a prospective study of 100 constipated patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 28(10):1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grossi U, Carrington EV, Bharucha AE, Horrocks EJ, Scott SM, Knowles CH (2016) Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation. Gut 65(3):447–455. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02056950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rockwood TH (2004) Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S106-113. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heaton KW, Radvan J, Cripps H, Mountford RA, Braddon FE, Hughes AO (1992) Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study. Gut 33(6):818–824. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.33.6.818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam TC, Islam N, Lubowski DZ, King DW (1993) Does squatting reduce pelvic floor descent during defaecation? Aust N Z J Surg 63(3):172–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00512.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tagart REB (1966) The anal canal and rectum: their varying relationship and its effect on anal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 9(6):449–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02617443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeuchi M, Odake M, Takaoka H, Hayashi Y, Yokoyama M (1992) Comparison between preload recruitable stroke work and the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship in man. Eur Heart J 13:80–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/13.suppl_e.80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Norton NJ (2004) The perspective of the patient. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S175-179. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, Meikle S, Mueller ER, Tuteja A, Weidner A, Weinstein M, Ye W, Pelvic Floor Disorders N (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 137(2):512-517.e5172. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chakrabarti SD, Ganguly R, Chatterjee SK, Chakravarty A (2002) Is squatting a triggering factor for stroke in Indians? Acta Neurol Scand 105(2):124–127. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.1o196.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chew G, Liao WB, Hsu TS, Bullard MJ (1996) Defecation induced deep venous thrombosis. A case report Jpn Heart J 37(3):409–415. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.37.409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (strategic recruitment funding), RCG grant #14106717, and HMRF grant #07180856.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HG, KF, TM, and SN designed the study and supervised the experimental work. SC, KF, WL, CW, and HG participated with the experiments. Data analysis was conducted by SC and HG and interpreted by all authors. All authors had access to the data, revised the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Gregersen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

HG is the inventor and filed patent applications. No other conflicts of interest noted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, SC., Futaba, K., Leung, W.W. et al. Fecobionics assessment of the effect of position on defecatory efficacy in normal subjects. Tech Coloproctol 25, 559–568 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02439-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02439-2

Keywords

Navigation