Abstract
Background
Laser fistulectomy is a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing procedure for treatment of anal fistula. In several studies, this method has been shown to be safe and effective, with reported success rates ranging from 40 to 88%. We hypothesized that with longer follow-up, these rates would decrease.
Methods
A retrospective case analysis assessing the effectiveness of laser fistulectomy in curing fistula-in-ano tracts within a cohort of patients at a single academic institution was conducted. All patients having laser ablation between March 2016 and July 2018 were analyzed. Cure of the fistula was determined by history and postoperative physical exam, and was defined as complete closure of fistula tract with resolution of symptoms. Secondary symptoms of fecal incontinence, infection, and pain were evaluated.
Results
Eighteen patients (10 males, mean age 41 ± 13 years) were analyzed. Transphincteric fistula was the most common type (67%, N = 12). The mean number of previous fistula procedures was 1.33 ± 1.64. There was a 22% (N = 4) success rate at an average postoperative follow-up period of 29 ± 8 months (range 18–46 months). Of those who failed, 64% (N = 9) had a subsequent fistula procedure. There were no cases of fecal incontinence, but 3 cases (17%) of postoperative infection were reported and 8 patients (44%) had a subjective increase in pain at first follow-up appointment.
Conclusions
Our data showed a much higher failure rate of laser fistulectomy compared to those reported in the literature. However, the small sample size, a large amount of heterogeneity in our patient population with a mixture of fistula types present, and various laser techniques applied decreased the power of this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dudukgian H, Abcarian H (2011) Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula? World J Gastroenterol 17(28):3292–3296
Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2017) A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Surgeon 15:30–39
Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:445–449
Wilhelm A, Fiebig A, Krawczak M (2017) Five years of experience with the FiLaCTMlaser for fistula-in-ano management: long-term follow-up from a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 21(4):269–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1599-7
Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2014) Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser - FiLaC™: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis 16(2):110–115
Adegbola SO, Sahnan K, Pellino G et al (2017) Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 21:775
Carvalho ALD, Alves Filho EF, Alcantara RSMD, Barreto MDS (2017) FILAC—Fistula—tract laser closure: a sphincter-preserving procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulas. J Coloproctol 37(2):160–162 (ISSN 2237-9363)
Altomare DF (2015) Anal fistula closure with FiLaC: new hope or the same old story? Tech Coloproctol 19:441–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1347-9
Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2015) Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaCTM): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol 19:449–453
Öztürk E, Gülcü B (2014) Laser ablation of fistula tract: a sphincter-preserving method for treating fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 57:360–364
Lauretta A, Falco N, Stocco E et al (2018) Anal fistula laser closure: the length of fistula is the achilles’ heel. Tech Coloproctol 22:933–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1885-z
Terzi MC, Agalar C, Habip S, Canda AE, Arslan NC, Obuz F (2018) Closing perianal fistulas using a laser: long-term results in 103 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 61(5):599–603. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001038 (PubMed PMID: 29528908)
Dixon M, Root J, Grant S, Stamos MJ (2004) Endorectal flap advancement repair is an effective treatment for selected patients with anorectal fistulas. Am Surg 70(10):925–927
Stamos MJ, Snyder M, Robb BW, Ky A, Singer M, Stewart DB, Abcarian H (2015) Prospective multicenter study of a synthetic bioabsorbable anal fistula plug to treat cryptoglandular transsphincteric anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 58(3):344–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by internal review board at the University of California, Irvine and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in Tokyo 2004). No study advertising was made and no remuneration was offered.
Informed consent
No informed consent was required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brabender, D.E., Moran, K.L., Brady, M. et al. Assessing the effectiveness of laser fistulectomy for anal fistula: a retrospective cohort study. Tech Coloproctol 24, 1071–1075 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02281-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02281-y