Skip to main content
Log in

Technique of the transobturator puborectal sling in fecal incontinence

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The puborectoplasty in fecal incontinence (FI) has been described through retropubic approach. Here, we describe a puborectal sling placement through transobturator approach with a device used for vaginal vault prolapse and report long-term outcome at 5 years.

Methods

Six women with FI for whom usual treatments (including sacral nerve stimulation) have failed were enrolled in a pilot study. Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) and FI quality of life (FIQL) were used to evaluate results.

Results

The median CCIS was significantly improved at 12 months (18.5 [15–20] vs 7.5 [4–20] in postoperative assessment; p = 0.037). The median FIQL was improved at 12 months (6.05 [5.6–7] vs 10.2 [5.6–12.5]; p = 0.0542). No adverse event was recorded except the distension of the device in one patient. Finally, at 5 years, 3 patients were improved, 1 had recurrence of FI symptoms (at 24 months) and 2 had no change.

Conclusion

This technique is a minimally invasive surgical treatment and constitutes a new therapeutic option for FI in case of failure of conventional treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Damon H, Schott AM, Barth X, Faucheron JL, Abramowitz L, Siproudhis L et al (2008) Clinical characteristics and quality of life in a cohort of 621 patients with faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:845–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leroi A-M, Parc Y, Lehur P-A, Mion F, Barth X, Rullier E et al (2005) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Ann Surg 242:662–669

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Graf W, Mellgren A, Matzel KE, Hull T, Johansson C, Bernstein M et al (2011) Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet 377:997–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leroi AM, Siproudhis L, Etienney I, Damon H, Zerbib F, Amarenco G et al (2012) Transcutaneous electrical tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a randomized trial (CONSORT 1a). Am J Gastroenterol 107:1888–1896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Rourke DA, Egerton WM (1985) A puborectal sling in the management of anal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Aust N Z J Surg 55:493–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamana T, Takahashi T, Iwadare J (2004) Perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence: preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1982–1989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Lescure G, Pezet D (1999) First validation of the French version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Chipponi J Gastroentérol Clin Biol 23:25–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenblatt P, Schumacher J, Lucente V, McNevin S, Rafferty J, Mellgren A (2014) A preliminary evaluation of the TOPAS system for the treatment of fecal incontinence in women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20:155–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mellgren A, Zutshi M, Lucente VR, Culligan P, Fenner DE (2016) TOPAS Study Group. A posterior anal sling for fecal incontinence: results of a 152-patient prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(349):e1–e8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Brochard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The autors have no conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual patients for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Additional information

Charlène Brochard and Michel Queralto have contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brochard, C., Queralto, M., Cabarrot, P. et al. Technique of the transobturator puborectal sling in fecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 21, 315–318 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1609-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1609-9

Keywords

Navigation