Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

High take-off intussusception or prolapse may have a poor outcome after standard ventral mesh rectopexy—a tailored approach is required

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Ohta T, Fujii W, Kusanagi H (2016) New-onset rectoanal intussusception may not result in symptomatic improvement after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 20(2):101–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJ, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IA, Consten EC (2016) Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 22(21):4977–4987

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A (2015) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 262(5):742–747 discussion 7–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG et al (2011) Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 22(7):789–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsunoda A, Ohta T, Kiyasu Y, Kusanagi H (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception: postoperative evaluation with proctography. Dis Colon Rectum 58(4):449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK

    P. J. Tozer, C. J. Vaizey, J. Grainger & J. H. Warusavitarne

Authors
  1. P. J. Tozer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. J. Vaizey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Grainger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. H. Warusavitarne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Tozer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tozer, P.J., Vaizey, C.J., Grainger, J. et al. High take-off intussusception or prolapse may have a poor outcome after standard ventral mesh rectopexy—a tailored approach is required. Tech Coloproctol 21, 405–406 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1604-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1604-1

Search

Navigation