Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic approaches for the resection of low rectal cancer and the extralevator technique for abdominoperineal excision are both becoming increasingly popular. There are little published data regarding the combined application of these techniques to the resection of low rectal tumours. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of such an approach and to appraise short-term outcomes in a consecutive series of patients undergoing laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE).

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic ELAPE at our institution between 2008 and 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The abdominal phase of the operation was performed laparoscopically, and following extralevator resection, the perineum was reconstructed using a biologic mesh. All patients were enrolled in an enhanced recovery programme.

Results

Of 166 patients undergoing radical resection of rectal cancer at our institution between 2008 and 2011, 28 underwent laparoscopic ELAPE. Median age was 70 years, median body mass index was 27.5 kg/m2, and 71 % were male. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 18 %. Three patients (10.8 %) had circumferential resection margins <1 mm; no intraoperative tumour perforation occurred. The median length of stay was 7 days, with a 30-day readmission rate of 21 % and no 30-day mortality. Post-operative perineal wound complications occurred in 25 %. At median 38-month follow-up (range 23–66 months), overall survival was 75 %, disease-free survival was 71 %, and there were three local recurrences (11 %).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision can be safely performed without compromising short-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist LE et al (2005) Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm. Br J Surg 92:225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wind J, Hofland J, Preckel B et al (2006) Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management vs standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 6:16

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. COLOR II Study Group. COLOR II (2009) A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  8. ACOSOG Z6051 trial (2013). http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00726622. Accessed 21 Jan 2013

  9. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, Sexton R, Moran BJ (1997) Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. An endangered operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40:747–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shihab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ (2010) Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:53–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J et al (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision, the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74–82

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van Krieken JHJ, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 3:9257–9264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miles WE (1971) A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908). CA Cancer J Clin 21:361–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore TJ, Moran BJ (2012) Precision surgery, precision terminology: the origins and meaning of ELAPE. Colorectal Dis 14:1173–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krishna A, Rickard MJ, Keshava A, Dent OF, Chapuis PH (2013) A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and ‘cylindrical’ abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 15:57–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–3522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams GT, Quirke P, Shepherd NA (2007) Minimum dataset for colorectal cancer. Histopathology reports, 2nd edn. Royal College of Pathologists, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bebenek M (2009) Abdominosacral amputation of the rectum for low rectal cancers: ten years of experience. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2211–2217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Schubert C, Puffer E, Haroske G, Witzigmann H (2011) Short term outcome of extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:919–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dalton RS, Smart NJ, Edwards TJ, Chandler I, Daniels IR (2012) Short-term outcomes of the perineal approach for extra-levator abdomino-perineal excision (elAPE). Surgeon 10:342–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaughan-Shaw PG, King AT, Cheung T et al (2011) Early experience with laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision within an enhanced recovery setting: analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:451–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jefferies MT, Evans MD, Hilton J, Chandrasekaran T, Beynon J, Khot U (2012) Oncological outcome after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 14:967–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boulind CE, Yeo M, Burkill C et al (2012) Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:e103–e110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, The COLOR II study group et al (2011) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 47(supplement 2):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L et al (2009) The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:1175–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Low Rectal Cancer National Development Programme (2012) English National Cancer Action Team, 2010. http://www.lorec.nhs.uk. Accessed 27 Sept 2012

  32. Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ et al (2012) Reconstruction of the perineum following extra-levator abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum—a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14:1052–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA (2005) Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum 48:438–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Campbell CA, Butler CE (2011) Use of adjuvant techniques improves surgical outcomes of complex vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstructions of pelvic cancer defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:447–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dahmann S, Simunec D, Caylak T, Biermann L, Frommhold K, Meyer-Marcotty MV (2012) Pelvic reconstruction after tubular rectumresection (extended abdominoperineal resection combined with extended transpelvic myocutaneous M. rectus abdominis flap (extended VRAM) in low rectum cancer—case series). Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 44:366–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Horch RE, D’Hoore A, Holm T, Kneser U, Hohenberger W, Arkudas A (2012) Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with open posterior cylindrical excision and primary transpelvic VRAM flap. Ann Surg Oncol 19:502–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK

    S. L. Kipling, K. Young, J. D. Foster, N. J. Smart, A. E. Hunter & N. K. Francis

  2. Department of Pathology, Yeovil District Hospital, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK

    E. Cooper

Authors
  1. S. L. Kipling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. D. Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. J. Smart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. E. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. N. K. Francis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. K. Francis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kipling, S.L., Young, K., Foster, J.D. et al. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series. Tech Coloproctol 18, 445–451 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1071-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1071-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation