Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rectal lumen obliteration from stapled hemorrhoidopexy: can it be prevented?

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is an operation that is widely used and accepted as a standard procedure by many surgery clinics as the postoperative pain is minimal, period needed for return to work and social life is short and recurrence rate is acceptable. However, stapled hemorrhoidopexy may also result in some major complications. An important proportion of these complications (such as anastomosis dehiscence, rectovaginal fistula, anorectal stricture and rectal obstruction) occur due to the errors of purse string suture technique. In this report, we present a case of rectal obstruction following stapled hemorrhoidopexy in a 27-year-old female patient with fourth grade hemorrhoidal disease and want to draw the attention to the probable ways by which rectal obstruction can occur due to this surgical method. The complication that occurred was related to a purse string suture that also crossed an internal rectal prolapse. Paying attention to the technique of purse string placement during the procedure, placing purse string sutures 3–4 cm proximal to the dentate line with intervals of 1–1.5 cm, verifying the existence of a lumen before introducing the stapler and just including the rectal mucosa will minimize the risk of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG (1992) Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 35:477–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–98

    Google Scholar 

  3. Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the sixth world congress of endoscopic surgery. Bologna, Rome, Italy, Monduzzi Editore, pp 777–784

  4. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ascanelli S, Gregorio C, Tonini G, Baccarini M, Azzena G (2005) Longo stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan–Morgan procedure: short and long term results of a randomised, controlled, prospective trial. Chir Ital 57:439–447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sabancı U, Ogun I, Candemir G (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. J Int Med Res 35:917–921

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Corman ML, Gravié JF, Hager T et al (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party—indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 5:304–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McCloud JM, Jameson JS, Scott AN (2006) Life-threatening sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 8:748–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 45:826–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong LY, Jiang JK, Chang SC, Lin JK (2003) Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 46:116–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A (2002) Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 45:268–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pescatori M (2003) PPH stapled hemorrhoidectomy—a cautionary note. Dis Colon Rectum 46:131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cipriani S, Pescatori M (2002) Acute rectal obstruction after PPH stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 4:367–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stukavec J, Horák L (2006) Complications of the Longo procedure—rectal occlusion. Rozhl Chir 85:517–519

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown S, Baraza W, Shorthouse A (2007) Total rectal lumen obliteration after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a cautionary tale. Tech Coloproctol 11:357–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Giordano P, Bradley BM, Peiris L (2008) Obliteration of the rectal lumen after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1574–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. A. Hasdemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Büyükaşık, O., Hasdemir, O.A. & Çöl, C. Rectal lumen obliteration from stapled hemorrhoidopexy: can it be prevented?. Tech Coloproctol 13, 333–335 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0536-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0536-9

Keywords

Navigation