Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit diversion in Japanese population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine risk factors influencing the incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) associated with ileal conduit (IC).

Methods

A total of 194 Japanese patients who underwent IC diversion followed by regular postoperative radiographic follow-up from 2005 through 2016 were enrolled. The diagnosis of PH was determined by computed tomography (CT) for patients with and without related symptoms. The cumulative incidence of PH was assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate risk factors associated with the incidence of PH.

Results

PH was observed in 20 patients (10.3%) after a median follow-up of 25.5 months. Of the 20 patients, three were symptomatic. The cumulative incidences were 3.6%, 10.1% and 15.1% at 1, 2 and 5 years after operation, respectively. The median body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2 (IQR 20.4–24.6). The BMI and diameter of the passage through the rectus abdominis muscle for the IC (DPRAM) were significant predictors for PH (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001, respectively). In proportional hazards regression analysis, DPRAM ≥ 2.4 cm was the only independent risk factor for developing PH (HR 10.94, 95% CI 3.66–32.64).

Conclusions

The incidence of PH in the current Japanese series was relatively low. Even in the population with low BMI, higher BMI might have an impact on incidence of PH. Moreover, DPRAM was also significantly associated with the incidence, suggesting that the operative procedure for creation of the passage is critical for future development of PH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bricker EM (1950) Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 30:1511–1521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shimko MS, Tollefson MK, Umbreit EC et al (2011) Long-term complications of conduit urinary diversion. J Urol 185:562–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donahue TF, Bochner BH (2016) Parastomal hernias after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. Investig Clin Urol 57:240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donahue TF, Bochner BH, Sfakianos JP et al (2014) Risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy. J Urol 191:1708–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Donahue TF, Cha EK, Bochner BH (2016) Rationale and early experience with prophylactic placement of mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation after ileal conduit urinary diversion and cystectomy for bladder cancer. Curr Urol Rep 17:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Narang SK, Alam NN, Campain NJ et al (2017) Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review. Hernia 21:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussein AA, Ahmed YE, May P et al (2018) Natural history and predictors of parastomal hernia after robot-assisted radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion. J Urol 199:766–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A et al (2007) Incidence and risk factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 178:950–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu NW, Hackney JT, Gellhaus PT et al (2014) Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. J Urol 191:1313–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pisters AL, Kamat AM, Wei W et al (2014) Anterior fascial fixation does not reduce the parastomal hernia rate after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. Urology 83:1427–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Movassaghi K, Shah SH, Cai J et al (2016) Incisional and parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: the University of Southern California experience. J Urol 196:777–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salvadalena G, Hendren S, McKenna L et al (2015) WOCN Society and AUA position statement on preoperative stoma site marking for patients undergoing urostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 42:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Budczies J, Klauschen F, Sinn BV et al (2012) Cutoff Finder: a comprehensive and straightforward Web application enabling rapid biomarker cutoff optimization. PLoS ONE 7:e51862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl 48:452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Funahashi K, Suzuki T, Nagashima Y et al (2014) Risk factors for parastomal hernia in Japanese patients with permanent colostomy. Surg Today 44:1465–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Kim Barrymore for correction of the English of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiaki Tanaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No author has any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maruo, K., Tanaka, T., Shindo, T. et al. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit diversion in Japanese population. Int J Clin Oncol 25, 1830–1834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01722-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01722-w

Keywords

Navigation