Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified FOLFOX6 with oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy and oral S-1 maintenance therapy in advanced colorectal cancer: CCOG-0704 study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A combination of fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is an established first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin often requires therapy to be discontinued while the patient is still responding. A strategy to stop FOLFOX, deliver 5-FU/LV as a maintenance therapy and reintroduce FOLFOX was found to be equivalent in terms of efficacy while neurotoxicity was substantially reduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of a stop-and-go strategy with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, as a maintenance therapy administered between modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) as a first-line treatment of mCRC.

Methods

Thirty patients with untreated mCRC were treated with six cycles of mFOLFOX6 followed by maintenance therapy with oral S-1. Reintroduction of mFOLFOX6 was scheduled after four cycles of S-1 or upon tumor progression. The primary endpoint was duration of disease control (DDC).

Results

Twenty-one of the 30 patients who achieved responses or stabilizations received S-1 maintenance therapy. mFOLFOX6 was reintroduced in 15 patients. Median DDC and progression-free survival were 9.3 and 7.9 months, respectively. The response rates and disease control rates were 40.0 and 86.6% for the initial mFOLFOX6, 23.8 and 57.1% for S-1 maintenance therapy and 20.0 and 73.3% for mFOLFOX6 reintroduction, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (93.3%) had peripheral neuropathy, but grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed in only 1 patient (3.3%).

Conclusion

The planned oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy with oral S-1 maintenance therapy was feasible as a first-line treatment for Japanese mCRC patients. Further prospective randomized control study is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938–2947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:23–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein D, Mitchell P, Michael M et al (2005) Australian experience of a modified schedule of FOLFOX with high activity and tolerability and improved convenience in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 92:832–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A et al (2006) OPTIMOX1: a randomised study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer—a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 24:394–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G et al (2009) Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 study. J Clin Oncol 27:5727–5733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Douillard JY, Hoff PM, Skillings JR et al (2002) Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3605–3616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carmichael J, Popiela T, Radstone D et al (2002) Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3617–3627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of a randomized Phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shirasaki T (2009) Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jap J Clin Oncol 39:2–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shirao K, Ohtsu A, Takada H et al (2004) Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 100:2355–2366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohtsu A, Baba H, Sakata Y et al (2000) Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer 83:141–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Sawako Kato and Ms. Miyuki Aoki for statistical assistance.

Conflict of interest

No author has any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goro Nakayama.

About this article

Cite this article

Nakayama, G., Kodera, Y., Yokoyama, H. et al. Modified FOLFOX6 with oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy and oral S-1 maintenance therapy in advanced colorectal cancer: CCOG-0704 study. Int J Clin Oncol 16, 506–511 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0214-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0214-6

Keywords

Navigation