Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical compliance with an oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in Japanese colorectal cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The combination of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) is widely accepted as adjuvant chemotherapy for stages II and III of colorectal cancer. However, the clinical compliance of Japanese patients with this regimen has not been clearly elucidated to date.

Methods

A total of 40 Japanese outpatients were treated with oral UFT plus LV as adjuvant chemotherapy following colorectal cancer surgery between January 2005 and June 2007. UFT capsules (300–500 mg/body per day) and LV tablets (75 mg/body per day, administered with each dose of UFT) were to be taken for 28 days, followed by 7 days of rest, with this cycle repeated every 35 days for 6 months or until recurrence. The patients were classified into the following three groups based on compliance: the completed group (n = 21), the modified group (n = 12), and the discontinued group (n = 7).

Results

The UFT doses (mean ± SD) were 267 ± 35 mg/m2 in the completed group, 276 ± 50 mg/m2 in the modified group, and 288 ± 22 mg/m2 in the discontinued group. The UFT dose in the discontinued group tended to be higher than that in the completed group (P = 0.12). The most frequent symptoms of nonhematologic toxicity were appetite loss (45%) and fatigue (45%). There were no hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4.

Conclusion

The regimen of oral UFT plus LV produced only low-grade toxicity and was convenient for outpatients. It appears that the initial UFT dose might be associated with the development of toxicity in the oral UFT plus LV regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Komatsu Y (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in Japan-current state and problem areas. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 34:799–807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lembersky BC, Wieand HS, Petrelli NJ, et al. (2006) Oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin compared with intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06. J Clin Oncol 24:2059–2064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borner MM, Schoffski P, de Wit R, et al. (2002) Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 38:349–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim DJ, Kim TI, Suh JH, et al. (2003) Oral tegafur-uracil plus folinic acid versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid as adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer. Yonsei Med J 44: 665–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, et al. (1999) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res 8:181–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ota K, Taguchi T, Kimura K. et al. (1988) Report on nationwide pooled data and cohort investigation in UFT phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 22:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Douillard JY, Hoff PM, Skillings JR, et al. (2002) Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3605–3616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmichael J, Popiela T, Radstone D, et al. (2002) Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3617–3627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kopec JA, Yothers G, Ganz PA, et al. (2007) Quality of life in operable colon cancer patients receiving oral compared with intravenous chemotherapy: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Trial C-06. J Clin Oncol 25: 424–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maroun J, Asche C, Romeyer F, et al. (2003) A cost comparison of oral tegafur plus uracil/folinic acid and parenteral fluorouracil for colorectal cancer in Canada. Pharmacoeconomics 21:1039–1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogata Y, Torigoe S, Matono K, et al. (2005) Prognostic factors after potentially curative resection in stage II or III colon cancer. Kurume Med J 52:67–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochster HS, Luo W, Popa EC, et al. (2007) Phase II study of uracil-tegafur with leucovorin in elderly (≥75 years old) patients with colorectal cancer: ECOG 1299. J Clin Oncol 25:5397–5402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Meguro.

About this article

Cite this article

Meguro, M., Furuhata, T., Okita, K. et al. Clinical compliance with an oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in Japanese colorectal cancer patients. Int J Clin Oncol 14, 402–407 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-009-0888-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-009-0888-1

Key words

Navigation