Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A pilot study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Both gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) are antineoplastic drugs with clinical activity in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly scheduled gemcitabine and PLD combination therapy in such patients.

Methods

Eighteen women with ovarian cancer that had recurred within 6 months after standard carboplatin and paclitaxel therapy were eligible for enrollment. Gemcitabine 2000 mg/m2 and PLD 20 mg/m2 were administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

Results

Hematological toxicity was mild. No severe (grade III/IV) leucopenia/neutropenia or thrombocytopenia was observed. Severe anemia was seen in only 3 (17%) patients. Several other severe nonhematological adverse effects were well tolerated and easily managed. The overall response rate was 28% (5 of 18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%–54%) with 2 (11%) complete and 3 (17%) partial responses. The median overall survival time was 17 months (range, 1 to 25 months). The median survival for patients with clinical benefit including disease response or stabilization was 17 months (range, 3 to 26 months) compared to that of patients with progressive disease, which was 2 months (range, 1 to 11 months; P = 0.04).

Conclusion

A biweekly schedule of gemcitabine combined with PLD is an active and safe chemotherapy regimen with acceptable and easily manageable toxicities in women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colombo N, Van Gorp T, Parma G, et al. (2006) Ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 60:159–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro JD, Millward MJ, Rischin D, et al. (1996) Activity of gemcitabine in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: responses seen following platinum and paclitaxel. Gynecol Oncol 63:89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Agostino G, Amant F, Berteloot P, et al. (2003) Phase II study of gemcitabine in recurrent platinum-and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 88:266–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon A, Fleagle JT, Guthrie D, et al. (2001) Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. J Clin Oncol 19:3312–3322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon AN, Granai CO, Rose PG, et al. (2000) Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-and paclitaxel-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:3093–3100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muggia FM, Hainsworth JD, Jeffers S, et al. (1997) Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in refractory ovarian cancer: antitumor activity and toxicity modification by liposomal encapsulation. J Clin Oncol 15:987–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallo D, Fruscella E, Ferlini C, et al. (2006) Preclinical in vivo activity of a combination gemcitabine/liposomal doxorubicin against cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer (A2780/CDDP). Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:222–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fracasso PM, Blum KA, Tan BR, et al. (2002) Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies. Cancer 95:2223–2229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Petru E, Angleitner-Boubenizek L, Reinthaller A, et al. (2006) Combined PEG liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine are active and have acceptable toxicity in patients with platinum-refractory and-resistant ovarian cancer after previous platinum-taxane therapy: a phase II Austrian AGO study. Gynecol Oncol 102:226–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Skarlos DV, Kalofonos HP, Fountzilas G, et al. (2005) Gemcitabine plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer resistant/refractory to platinum and/or taxanes. A HeCOG phase II study. Anticancer Res 25:3103–3108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrandina G, Paris I, Ludovisi M, et al. (2005) Gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin in the salvage treatment of ovarian cancer: updated results and long-term survival. Gynecol Oncol 98:267–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holloway RW, Finkler NJ, Nye LP, et al. (2004) Doxil and gemcitabine combination therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a phase II trial. ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. J Clin Oncol 22:5090

    Google Scholar 

  13. D’Agostino G, Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, et al. (2003) Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the salvage treatment of ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1180–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oskay G, Sehouli J, Katsares I, et al. (2004) Biweekly schedule of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) induces low rates of skin toxicities: results of a phase II trial in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. J Clin Oncol 22:5072

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faruk Tas.

About this article

Cite this article

Tas, F., Guney, N., Derin, D. et al. A pilot study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 13, 156–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0740-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0740-4

Key words

Navigation