Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of pest control efficiencies for different banker plant systems with a simple predator–prey model

  • Original article
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

The banker plant system has been introduced for the biological control of various pest species in Japanese greenhouses. With the banker plant system, non-crop plants infested with a host insect (a non-commercial crop pest) are placed in the greenhouse to provide alternative resources for the parasitoids or predators. We want to evaluate the effectiveness for controlling pests on the crop in a quantitative way by immigrating predators from the banker plant. Therefore, we developed a simple model for the interaction of the pest and predator in the crop and included the banker plant only as a source for predators. For three different pest-predator systems we parameterised the model and used these models to predict under what conditions biological control in a banker plant system is successful. We defined successful as keeping the pest below the economic injury level of the crop estimated from damage analysis. Because the crop is mostly grown during a period that lasts less than a year our analysis should not only focus on the equilibrium dynamics. In contrast, it should also focus on the transient dynamics. Our main analytical result, from the equilibrium analysis, is that for successful control the maximum lifetime consumption of immigrating predators should exceed the daily prey growth at half the value of the maximum consumption rate. For practical purpose this translates into the fact that the immigration of predators at a low initial pest density is crucial for successful control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe J, Kumakura H, Yano E (2011a) Biological control of aphids in sweet pepper greenhouses using the banker plant system for aphidophagous gall midge, Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Ann Rept Kansai Pl Prot 53:37–46 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abe J, Mitsunaga T, Kumakura H, Yano E (2011b) Comparative studies on development and reproduction of four cereal aphid species reared on sorghum or barley to evaluate as alternative prey for banker plant system. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 55:227–239 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennison JA (1992) Biological control of aphids on cucumbers: use of open rearing systems or “banker plants” to aid establishment of Aphidius matricariae and Aphidoletes aphidimyza. Med Fac Landbouww Univ Gent 57(2b):457–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennison JA, Corless SP (1993) Biological control of aphids on cucumbers: further development of open rearing units or “banker plants” to aid establishment of aphid natural enemies. IOBC/WPRS Bull 16(2):5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Blümel S (2004) Biological control of aphids on vegetable crops. In: Heinz K, van Driesche R, Parrella M (eds) Biocontrol in protected culture. Ball Publishing, Batavia, pp 297–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs CJ, Hoopes MF (2004) Stabilizing effects in spatial parasitoid–host and predator–prey models: a review. Theor Popul Biol 65:299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi MY, Roitberg BD, Shani A, Raworth DA, Lee GH (2004) Olfactory response by the aphidophagous gall midge, Aphidoletes aphidimyza to honeydew from green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Entomol Exp Appl 111:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH (1981) Dispersal and the stability of predator-prey interaction. Am Nat 118:673–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein-Keshet L (1988) Mathematical models in biology. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank SD (2010) Biological control of arthropod pests using banker plant systems: Past progress and future directions. Biol Control 52:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh T, Nozawa M, Yamaguchi K (2004a) Prey consumption and functional response of three acarophagous species to eggs of the two-spotted spider mite in the laboratory. Appl Entomol Zool 39:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh T, Yamaguchi K, Mori K (2004b) Effect of temperature on life history of the predatory mite Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 32:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LS (1983) Introduction of Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rond.) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from an open rearing unit for the control of aphids in glasshouses. IOBC/WPRS Bull 6(3):146–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris KM (1973) Aphidophagous Cecidomyiidae (Diptera): taxonomy, biology and assessments of field populations. Bull Entomol Res 63:305–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higashida K, Yano E, Nishikawa S, Ono S, Okuno N, Sakaguchi T (2016) Reproduction and oviposition selection by Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on the banker plants with alternative prey aphids or crop plants with pest aphids. Appl Entomol Zool 51:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang N, Enkegaard A, Osborne LS, Ramakers PMJ, Messelink GJ, Pijnakker J, Murphy G (2011) The banker plant method in biological control. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A, Sabelis MW (1992) Phytoseiid life-histories, local predator-prey dynamics, and strategies for control of tetranychid mites. Exp Appl Acarol 14:233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Plant Protection Association (2015) http://www.jppa.or.jp/tecinfo/ipm_1.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2018

  • Kawai A (1986) Studies on population ecology and population management of Thrips palmi Karny. Bull Veg Ornam Crops Res Stn Ser C (Kurume) 9:69–135 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lungren JG (2009) Relationships of natural enemies and non-prey foods. Springer, Breiningsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki M (2009) Development, reproduction and prey consumption of thrips predator Gynaeseius liturivorus (Ehara) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). J Acarol Soc Jpn 18:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagasaka K, Takahashi N, Okabayashi T (2010) Impact of secondary parasitism on Aphidius colemani in the banker plant system on aphid control in commercial greenhouses in Kochi, Japan. Appl Entomol Zool 45:541–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pels B, De Roos AM, Sabelis MW (2002) Evolutionary dynamics of prey exploitation in a metapopulation of predators. Am Nat 159:172–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakers PMJ, Voet SJP (1996) Introduction of Amblyseius degenerans for thrips control in sweet peppers with potted plants of castor beans as banker plants. IOBC/WPRS Bull 19:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve JD (1988) Environmental viability, migration and persistence in host–parasitoid systems. Am Nat 132:810–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis MW (1985) Capacity for population increase. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • van Steenis MJ (1993) Intrinsic rate of increase of Aphidius colemani Vier. (Hym., Braconidae), a parasitoid of Aphis gossypii Glov. (Hom., Aphididae), at different temperatures. J Appl Entomol 116:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC (1995) Integrated pest management in protected crops. In: Dent D (ed) Integrated pest management: principles and systems development. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 311–343

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nes EH (2008) GRIND for MATLAB. http://www.sparcs-center.org/grind. Accessed 23 Feb 2018

  • van Rijn PCJ, Van Houten YM, Sabelis MW (2002) How plants benefit from providing food for predators even when it is also edible to herbivores. Ecology 83:2664–2679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf W (1995) How do immigration rates affect predator/prey interactions in field crops? Predictions from simple models and an example involving the spread of aphid-borne viruses in sugarbeet. In: Toft S, Riedel W (eds) Arthropod natural enemies in arable land I, Density, spatial heterogeneity and dispersal. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 295–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Walde SJ (1994) Immigration and the dynamics of a predator-prey interaction in biological control. J Anim Ecol 63:337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe H, Katayama N, Yano E, Sugiyama R, Nishikawa S, Endou T, Watanabe K, Takabayashi J, Ozawa R (2014) Effects of aphid honeydew sugars on the longevity and fecundity of the aphidophagous gall midge Aphidoletes aphidimyza. Biol Control 78:55–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe H, Yano E, Higashida K, Hasegawa S, Takabayashi J, Ozawa R (2016) An attractant of the aphidophagous gall midge Aphidoletes aphidimyza from honeydew of Aphis gossypii. J Chem Ecol 42:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yano E (2006) Ecological considerations for biological control of aphids in protected culture. Popul Ecol 48:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Wopke van der Werf for critical comments on an earlier draft of the paper. This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (research and development projects for application in promoting new policy of agriculture, forestry and fisheries, 2021). Most of the theoretical analysis of this work was performed in Japan, during LH’s stay that was subsidised by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, ID S-08116). We are highly grateful to Ernst Lippe, who preparing the final version of the figures. Elizabeth van Ast-Gray is thanked for correction of the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Analysed data for parameter values: EY, JA, LH. Contributed to development and analysis of model: EY, LH. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: EY, JA, LH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eizi Yano.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 574 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yano, E., Abe, J. & Hemerik, L. Evaluation of pest control efficiencies for different banker plant systems with a simple predator–prey model. Popul Ecol 60, 389–396 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-018-0636-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-018-0636-3

Keywords

Navigation